Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To help your reading probably helpful to decode:
Middle class students = White kids
Convicted criminals = Black people
It actually would have cut this thread in half.
Only your race-baiting butt thinks this. The photo used by the university features mostly white convicts.
Anonymous wrote:To help your reading probably helpful to decode:
Middle class students = White kids
Convicted criminals = Black people
It actually would have cut this thread in half.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really OP? eyeroll.
Wouldn't you rather these convicts learn something useful while they are serving time - and perhaps give them a chance to be productive, self supporting individuals when they leave?
And for those that don't leave....how exactly is their degree behind bars of any consequence to your low/middle class kid.
Finally, I bet you you looked hard enough, you could find a school willing to help your child go to college. If your kid is a good student, find a school that has stats far below their own and get merit aid.
I bet you're wrong. And pray tell, why don't the convicted felons need to have "good" stats? And by good you mean great. Yet most criminals are bottom their class at lower end high schools. Yet to get free college via merit and financial aid as a law-abiding kid, you need near perfect stats and finish at the top of the class. How is this in any way fair to donut hole low and middle class kids?
Um, I don’t think you need top stats to get into this particular college and I doubt you’d send your kid there.
Sure, let’s complain about crime but do nothing to give people opportunities so they are recidivist. Great plan.
Anonymous wrote:I’m not upset prisoners have this option.
I’m upset non-prisoners don’t
Anonymous wrote:To help your reading probably helpful to decode:
Middle class students = White kids
Convicted criminals = Black people
It actually would have cut this thread in half.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really OP? eyeroll.
Wouldn't you rather these convicts learn something useful while they are serving time - and perhaps give them a chance to be productive, self supporting individuals when they leave?
And for those that don't leave....how exactly is their degree behind bars of any consequence to your low/middle class kid.
Finally, I bet you you looked hard enough, you could find a school willing to help your child go to college. If your kid is a good student, find a school that has stats far below their own and get merit aid.
Prison is for punishment
It is also for rehabilitation. Up until the 1970s/80s, US prisons used to focus a lot more on rehabilitation, encouraging inmates to develop trade skills to help them find legal employment after their release. But then the "tough on crime movement" started that focused more on punishment, with the private prison movement (which does not want to spend a money on anything that is not strictly necessary) following shortly thereafter. Opportunities and resources for rehabilitation dropped dramatically and, not surprisingly, recidivism rates skyrocketed. If we want to reduce crime in this country, rehabilitation, including education and job training, need to be given a higher priority so that former inmates have viable options for legal employment and are not forced to return to crime to support themselves.
But Larla lives in a nice neighborhood with very little crime so what do they care about how these people fair after they get out of prison. That only affects poor people of color. Larla DESERVES the same amount of money for college.
In all seriousness, I think college should be free for all. I would make the entrance exams super hard so that the schools have to actually teach our kids something instead of just babysitting, but once they get in and prove they are capable, no cost to students.
I'd be thrilled with this assuming that it was limited to certain degrees. You want a degree in education, nursing, CS, engineering etc. and are smart? We'll pay for it. You want a degree in 17th century french poetry? Feel free to pay yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really OP? eyeroll.
Wouldn't you rather these convicts learn something useful while they are serving time - and perhaps give them a chance to be productive, self supporting individuals when they leave?
And for those that don't leave....how exactly is their degree behind bars of any consequence to your low/middle class kid.
Finally, I bet you you looked hard enough, you could find a school willing to help your child go to college. If your kid is a good student, find a school that has stats far below their own and get merit aid.
Prison is for punishment
It is also for rehabilitation. Up until the 1970s/80s, US prisons used to focus a lot more on rehabilitation, encouraging inmates to develop trade skills to help them find legal employment after their release. But then the "tough on crime movement" started that focused more on punishment, with the private prison movement (which does not want to spend a money on anything that is not strictly necessary) following shortly thereafter. Opportunities and resources for rehabilitation dropped dramatically and, not surprisingly, recidivism rates skyrocketed. If we want to reduce crime in this country, rehabilitation, including education and job training, need to be given a higher priority so that former inmates have viable options for legal employment and are not forced to return to crime to support themselves.
But Larla lives in a nice neighborhood with very little crime so what do they care about how these people fair after they get out of prison. That only affects poor people of color. Larla DESERVES the same amount of money for college.
In all seriousness, I think college should be free for all. I would make the entrance exams super hard so that the schools have to actually teach our kids something instead of just babysitting, but once they get in and prove they are capable, no cost to students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really OP? eyeroll.
Wouldn't you rather these convicts learn something useful while they are serving time - and perhaps give them a chance to be productive, self supporting individuals when they leave?
And for those that don't leave....how exactly is their degree behind bars of any consequence to your low/middle class kid.
Finally, I bet you you looked hard enough, you could find a school willing to help your child go to college. If your kid is a good student, find a school that has stats far below their own and get merit aid.
Prison is for punishment
It is also for rehabilitation. Up until the 1970s/80s, US prisons used to focus a lot more on rehabilitation, encouraging inmates to develop trade skills to help them find legal employment after their release. But then the "tough on crime movement" started that focused more on punishment, with the private prison movement (which does not want to spend a money on anything that is not strictly necessary) following shortly thereafter. Opportunities and resources for rehabilitation dropped dramatically and, not surprisingly, recidivism rates skyrocketed. If we want to reduce crime in this country, rehabilitation, including education and job training, need to be given a higher priority so that former inmates have viable options for legal employment and are not forced to return to crime to support themselves.