Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It will be a wonderful year next year - incompetent racist fairfax school board members will be thrown out on their asses and the SCOTUS will rule and announce to end affirmative action case soon after that
Right - the Supreme Court do not need Robert's vote to end AA with Harvard case.
You got that right.
Don't think they will try to tell a private University who they should admit. It's perfectly reasonable that they value diversity. I know I do.
You are misinformed and should brush up on Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which conditions federal assistance to private universities on their non-discrimination. Harvard gets lots of federal research grants.
There's really no doubt on that point; the issue is what constitutes discrimination on the basis of "race, color, or national origin."
The current Supreme Court isn't going to put up with Ibram Kendi-style "the only remedy to past discrimination is future discrimination" justifications for discrimination against Asian and White students.
Trying to label diversity as discrimination is like calling up down or left right . Your purposefully misleading people with this juvenile sophistry.
Asians are discriminated in the college admissions process.
I don't know about that but since we do know that the county is roughly 15% Asian and that Asians make up over 50% of TJ there is no discrimination going on there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It will be a wonderful year next year - incompetent racist fairfax school board members will be thrown out on their asses and the SCOTUS will rule and announce to end affirmative action case soon after that
Right - the Supreme Court do not need Robert's vote to end AA with Harvard case.
You got that right.
Don't think they will try to tell a private University who they should admit. It's perfectly reasonable that they value diversity. I know I do.
You are misinformed and should brush up on Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which conditions federal assistance to private universities on their non-discrimination. Harvard gets lots of federal research grants.
There's really no doubt on that point; the issue is what constitutes discrimination on the basis of "race, color, or national origin."
The current Supreme Court isn't going to put up with Ibram Kendi-style "the only remedy to past discrimination is future discrimination" justifications for discrimination against Asian and White students.
Trying to label diversity as discrimination is like calling up down or left right . Your purposefully misleading people with this juvenile sophistry.
Asians are discriminated in the college admissions process.
I don't know about that but since we do know that the county is roughly 15% Asian and that Asians make up over 50% of TJ there is no discrimination going on there.
US District Court Judge ruled otherwise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It will be a wonderful year next year - incompetent racist fairfax school board members will be thrown out on their asses and the SCOTUS will rule and announce to end affirmative action case soon after that
Right - the Supreme Court do not need Robert's vote to end AA with Harvard case.
You got that right.
Don't think they will try to tell a private University who they should admit. It's perfectly reasonable that they value diversity. I know I do.
You are misinformed and should brush up on Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which conditions federal assistance to private universities on their non-discrimination. Harvard gets lots of federal research grants.
There's really no doubt on that point; the issue is what constitutes discrimination on the basis of "race, color, or national origin."
The current Supreme Court isn't going to put up with Ibram Kendi-style "the only remedy to past discrimination is future discrimination" justifications for discrimination against Asian and White students.
Trying to label diversity as discrimination is like calling up down or left right . Your purposefully misleading people with this juvenile sophistry.
Asians are discriminated in the college admissions process.
I don't know about that but since we do know that the county is roughly 15% Asian and that Asians make up over 50% of TJ there is no discrimination going on there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It will be a wonderful year next year - incompetent racist fairfax school board members will be thrown out on their asses and the SCOTUS will rule and announce to end affirmative action case soon after that
Right - the Supreme Court do not need Robert's vote to end AA with Harvard case.
You got that right.
Don't think they will try to tell a private University who they should admit. It's perfectly reasonable that they value diversity. I know I do.
You are misinformed and should brush up on Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which conditions federal assistance to private universities on their non-discrimination. Harvard gets lots of federal research grants.
There's really no doubt on that point; the issue is what constitutes discrimination on the basis of "race, color, or national origin."
The current Supreme Court isn't going to put up with Ibram Kendi-style "the only remedy to past discrimination is future discrimination" justifications for discrimination against Asian and White students.
Trying to label diversity as discrimination is like calling up down or left right . Your purposefully misleading people with this juvenile sophistry.
Asians are discriminated in the college admissions process.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The admissions process at TJ may not have been fool proof in the past but it functioned reasonably well. Now it’s just a hash. Imagine a process whose goal isn’t to admit the best qualified kids but just to keep low-brow politicians like Karen Keys Gamarra and Karen Corbett Sanders off your backs.
Sure, if you are okay with allowing the wealthy to game admission and excluding the poor.
There aren't many wealthy students at TJ - most are middle class except some wealthy white students.
Most have families who shell out $20k for prep classes so by my definition they're wealthy.
TJ classes do not cost $20k. You must be thinking of your wealthy white friends who provide one on one and secretive preps that cost $20k.
If you didn't get the platinum prep package, it's no wonder your kid was rejected.
My kid didn't need any TJ prep and he already graduated from TJ. I guess you are very familiar with TJ prep programs including one that costs 20K!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It will be a wonderful year next year - incompetent racist fairfax school board members will be thrown out on their asses and the SCOTUS will rule and announce to end affirmative action case soon after that
Right - the Supreme Court do not need Robert's vote to end AA with Harvard case.
You got that right.
Don't think they will try to tell a private University who they should admit. It's perfectly reasonable that they value diversity. I know I do.
You are misinformed and should brush up on Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which conditions federal assistance to private universities on their non-discrimination. Harvard gets lots of federal research grants.
There's really no doubt on that point; the issue is what constitutes discrimination on the basis of "race, color, or national origin."
The current Supreme Court isn't going to put up with Ibram Kendi-style "the only remedy to past discrimination is future discrimination" justifications for discrimination against Asian and White students.
Trying to label diversity as discrimination is like calling up down or left right . Your purposefully misleading people with this juvenile sophistry.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It will be a wonderful year next year - incompetent racist fairfax school board members will be thrown out on their asses and the SCOTUS will rule and announce to end affirmative action case soon after that
Right - the Supreme Court do not need Robert's vote to end AA with Harvard case.
You got that right.
Don't think they will try to tell a private University who they should admit. It's perfectly reasonable that they value diversity. I know I do.
You are misinformed and should brush up on Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which conditions federal assistance to private universities on their non-discrimination. Harvard gets lots of federal research grants.
There's really no doubt on that point; the issue is what constitutes discrimination on the basis of "race, color, or national origin."
The current Supreme Court isn't going to put up with Ibram Kendi-style "the only remedy to past discrimination is future discrimination" justifications for discrimination against Asian and White students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It will be a wonderful year next year - incompetent racist fairfax school board members will be thrown out on their asses and the SCOTUS will rule and announce to end affirmative action case soon after that
Right - the Supreme Court do not need Robert's vote to end AA with Harvard case.
You got that right.
Don't think they will try to tell a private University who they should admit. It's perfectly reasonable that they value diversity. I know I do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It will be a wonderful year next year - incompetent racist fairfax school board members will be thrown out on their asses and the SCOTUS will rule and announce to end affirmative action case soon after that
Right - the Supreme Court do not need Robert's vote to end AA with Harvard case.
You got that right.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The admissions process at TJ may not have been fool proof in the past but it functioned reasonably well. Now it’s just a hash. Imagine a process whose goal isn’t to admit the best qualified kids but just to keep low-brow politicians like Karen Keys Gamarra and Karen Corbett Sanders off your backs.
Sure, if you are okay with allowing the wealthy to game admission and excluding the poor.
There aren't many wealthy students at TJ - most are middle class except some wealthy white students.
Most have families who shell out $20k for prep classes so by my definition they're wealthy.
TJ classes do not cost $20k. You must be thinking of your wealthy white friends who provide one on one and secretive preps that cost $20k.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It will be a wonderful year next year - incompetent racist fairfax school board members will be thrown out on their asses and the SCOTUS will rule and announce to end affirmative action case soon after that
Right - the Supreme Court do not need Robert's vote to end AA with Harvard case.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The admissions process at TJ may not have been fool proof in the past but it functioned reasonably well. Now it’s just a hash. Imagine a process whose goal isn’t to admit the best qualified kids but just to keep low-brow politicians like Karen Keys Gamarra and Karen Corbett Sanders off your backs.
Sure, if you are okay with allowing the wealthy to game admission and excluding the poor.
There aren't many wealthy students at TJ - most are middle class except some wealthy white students.
Most have families who shell out $20k for prep classes so by my definition they're wealthy.
TJ classes do not cost $20k. You must be thinking of your wealthy white friends who provide one on one and secretive preps that cost $20k.
If you didn't get the platinum prep package, it's no wonder your kid was rejected.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The admissions process at TJ may not have been fool proof in the past but it functioned reasonably well. Now it’s just a hash. Imagine a process whose goal isn’t to admit the best qualified kids but just to keep low-brow politicians like Karen Keys Gamarra and Karen Corbett Sanders off your backs.
Sure, if you are okay with allowing the wealthy to game admission and excluding the poor.
There aren't many wealthy students at TJ - most are middle class except some wealthy white students.
Most have families who shell out $20k for prep classes so by my definition they're wealthy.
TJ classes do not cost $20k. You must be thinking of your wealthy white friends who provide one on one and secretive preps that cost $20k.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The admissions process at TJ may not have been fool proof in the past but it functioned reasonably well. Now it’s just a hash. Imagine a process whose goal isn’t to admit the best qualified kids but just to keep low-brow politicians like Karen Keys Gamarra and Karen Corbett Sanders off your backs.
Sure, if you are okay with allowing the wealthy to game admission and excluding the poor.
There aren't many wealthy students at TJ - most are middle class except some wealthy white students.
Most have families who shell out $20k for prep classes so by my definition they're wealthy.
TJ classes do not cost $20k. You must be thinking of your wealthy white friends who provide one on one and secretive preps that cost $20k.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The admissions process at TJ may not have been fool proof in the past but it functioned reasonably well. Now it’s just a hash. Imagine a process whose goal isn’t to admit the best qualified kids but just to keep low-brow politicians like Karen Keys Gamarra and Karen Corbett Sanders off your backs.
Sure, if you are okay with allowing the wealthy to game admission and excluding the poor.
There aren't many wealthy students at TJ - most are middle class except some wealthy white students.
Most have families who shell out $20k for prep classes so by my definition they're wealthy.