Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't have to conjure up visions of tent cities and violent crime because they are all around us in DC. I get notifications of gunshots and stabbings nearly daily on my Ring camera app, set to a two-mile radius around my house in Ward 3. Progressivism has gone overboard in protecting the rights of people who commit crime, especially violent crime. What about the rights of the victims and potential victims, the right of all of us to feel safe in our communities. I want to vote for someone who hasn't lost sight of that, and who isn't afraid of being cancelled or smeared for saying he will try to do something about it. That is an idea and a principle, just one the progressive candidates don't like.

I mean, you’re just making my point for me. You’re scared, and you’ve decided that Goulet is the only acceptable answer, despite the fact that you don’t/can’t cite a single policy or proposal he’s offered for making life in the city better. Nor, interestingly, are you holding Muriel Bowser—distinctly not a progressive but the most powerful person in the city for the last eight years—accountable for the apparent hellscape the city has become.

I’m not trying to convince you to vote for Frumin; it’s clear that will never happen. I just find it fascinating what’s motivating support for Goulet.

What is motivating support for Goulet is that he not part of the groupthink that has contributed to and tolerated the status quo.

He has worked for council members or the city for almost 20 yrs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't have to conjure up visions of tent cities and violent crime because they are all around us in DC. I get notifications of gunshots and stabbings nearly daily on my Ring camera app, set to a two-mile radius around my house in Ward 3. Progressivism has gone overboard in protecting the rights of people who commit crime, especially violent crime. What about the rights of the victims and potential victims, the right of all of us to feel safe in our communities. I want to vote for someone who hasn't lost sight of that, and who isn't afraid of being cancelled or smeared for saying he will try to do something about it. That is an idea and a principle, just one the progressive candidates don't like.

I mean, you’re just making my point for me. You’re scared, and you’ve decided that Goulet is the only acceptable answer, despite the fact that you don’t/can’t cite a single policy or proposal he’s offered for making life in the city better. Nor, interestingly, are you holding Muriel Bowser—distinctly not a progressive but the most powerful person in the city for the last eight years—accountable for the apparent hellscape the city has become.

I’m not trying to convince you to vote for Frumin; it’s clear that will never happen. I just find it fascinating what’s motivating support for Goulet.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't have to conjure up visions of tent cities and violent crime because they are all around us in DC. I get notifications of gunshots and stabbings nearly daily on my Ring camera app, set to a two-mile radius around my house in Ward 3. Progressivism has gone overboard in protecting the rights of people who commit crime, especially violent crime. What about the rights of the victims and potential victims, the right of all of us to feel safe in our communities. I want to vote for someone who hasn't lost sight of that, and who isn't afraid of being cancelled or smeared for saying he will try to do something about it. That is an idea and a principle, just one the progressive candidates don't like.

I mean, you’re just making my point for me. You’re scared, and you’ve decided that Goulet is the only acceptable answer, despite the fact that you don’t/can’t cite a single policy or proposal he’s offered for making life in the city better. Nor, interestingly, are you holding Muriel Bowser—distinctly not a progressive but the most powerful person in the city for the last eight years—accountable for the apparent hellscape the city has become.

I’m not trying to convince you to vote for Frumin; it’s clear that will never happen. I just find it fascinating what’s motivating support for Goulet.

What is motivating support for Goulet is that he not part of the groupthink that has contributed to and tolerated the status quo.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't have to conjure up visions of tent cities and violent crime because they are all around us in DC. I get notifications of gunshots and stabbings nearly daily on my Ring camera app, set to a two-mile radius around my house in Ward 3. Progressivism has gone overboard in protecting the rights of people who commit crime, especially violent crime. What about the rights of the victims and potential victims, the right of all of us to feel safe in our communities. I want to vote for someone who hasn't lost sight of that, and who isn't afraid of being cancelled or smeared for saying he will try to do something about it. That is an idea and a principle, just one the progressive candidates don't like.

I mean, you’re just making my point for me. You’re scared, and you’ve decided that Goulet is the only acceptable answer, despite the fact that you don’t/can’t cite a single policy or proposal he’s offered for making life in the city better. Nor, interestingly, are you holding Muriel Bowser—distinctly not a progressive but the most powerful person in the city for the last eight years—accountable for the apparent hellscape the city has become.

I’m not trying to convince you to vote for Frumin; it’s clear that will never happen. I just find it fascinating what’s motivating support for Goulet.

Anonymous wrote:I don't have to conjure up visions of tent cities and violent crime because they are all around us in DC. I get notifications of gunshots and stabbings nearly daily on my Ring camera app, set to a two-mile radius around my house in Ward 3. Progressivism has gone overboard in protecting the rights of people who commit crime, especially violent crime. What about the rights of the victims and potential victims, the right of all of us to feel safe in our communities. I want to vote for someone who hasn't lost sight of that, and who isn't afraid of being cancelled or smeared for saying he will try to do something about it. That is an idea and a principle, just one the progressive candidates don't like.

Anonymous wrote:Goulet hasn't worked in the private sector. That is actually a negative for me but I would still rather vote for the numbers wonk from the Williams administration than add to the Council's progressive bloc and ensure that DC continues down its merry SF-emulating way of tent encampments and high crime.

Anonymous wrote:Goulet hasn't worked in the private sector. That is actually a negative for me but I would still rather vote for the numbers wonk from the Williams administration than add to the Council's progressive bloc and ensure that DC continues down its merry SF-emulating way of tent encampments and high crime.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Goulet is not being supported by "out of state" interests. Goulet does have the support of a lot of business interests who appreciate the fact that Goulet has YEARS of experience understanding the DC budget and how taxes and revenue works. Goulet is the only candidate sounding the alarm about how the DC budget has continued to expand significantly at the same time the city is losing residents. Goulet understands that when the next round of tax assessments is done on all the vacant office buildings downtown, the city's coffers are going to decrease as well. The city council has far too many relative novices in understanding how all those moving pieces work together.

Goulet only understands budgets. At no point during this election did he have any unique or creative ideas on how to improve Ward 3. He talked about his experience with budgets at every debate.
He never mentioned his activism in the community because he has never been involved in the community. He's good at talking about budgets.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m voting for Goulet. He’s the least crazy of the bunch.

It’s honestly a pivotal moment for the city. Pull back from the brink with Goulet or follow SFs lead. It cannot be more plain than that.

Really? Support programs like paid family leave and ranked-choice voting or throw millions at an NFL stadium while blocking new DCPS schools...

The decision should be clear.

A guy with the wholehearted support of the most radical, fringe elements of city government will not provide an important buttress against the forces of irresponsibility in this city.

It happens slow, then fast. But the fights over zoning and density will be pretty meaningless in a couple years of continued negative population growth. If there is a recession right now, DC could be in serious trouble if private sector investment dries up in the city and what little investment there is continues apace in Arlington and Fairfax at a time when the Federal government will be shrinking COVID deficits. It’s a perfect storm for a city that has considers itself “recession proof”. Maybe not this time.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m voting for Goulet. He’s the least crazy of the bunch.

It’s honestly a pivotal moment for the city. Pull back from the brink with Goulet or follow SFs lead. It cannot be more plain than that.

Really? Support programs like paid family leave and ranked-choice voting or throw millions at an NFL stadium while blocking new DCPS schools...

The decision should be clear.