Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I looked that that Instagram and I am surprised. The OP is correct that the top college admits - basically top 20, save the Chicago unhooked kids, actually do all have hooks. Also so many lackluster colleges. Tulane, BU, BC seems to be the level and “average” unhooked kids will get into. All great top 50 schools but meh? Also multiple (at least 10percent 6/7 kids) students attending random low ranked schools. It was a bad year for admission with record applicants and many schools not looking at standardized testing.
Tulane, BC and BU were "meh" in 1985.
In 2022, they are fantastic options and very difficult to get into.
Context matters.
And how dare you disparage the achievements of these kids?
+2 Meh? No way. Tulane, BC and BU are all really hard to get into and filled with top students. Three great schools. You need to get acclimated to 2022.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I looked that that Instagram and I am surprised. The OP is correct that the top college admits - basically top 20, save the Chicago unhooked kids, actually do all have hooks. Also so many lackluster colleges. Tulane, BU, BC seems to be the level and “average” unhooked kids will get into. All great top 50 schools but meh? Also multiple (at least 10percent 6/7 kids) students attending random low ranked schools. It was a bad year for admission with record applicants and many schools not looking at standardized testing.
Tulane, BC and BU were "meh" in 1985.
In 2022, they are fantastic options and very difficult to get into.
Context matters.
And how dare you disparage the achievements of these kids?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My daughter is almost a straight A student in lower high school (a few A minuses). She works really hard for these grades. I've been looking at the college admissions this year and it really seems like you have about 25 girls going ti top colleges and (outside of two girls) ALL are legacy, URM or crew athletes. Then the admissions seem to go off a cliff. thank goodness for u of Chicagj because that seems it be the solo outlier.
I am not looking for an IVY admit (at all) but I'm getting freaked out by the schools that girls outside of the above categories are attending. I won't name names but they're in instagram.
Tell it to my straight. A/a- student.
Did anyone apply their daughter from NCS this year? Where are we looking at?
Op you are a stalker of minor age children and it is creepy. Get a life.
Not to mention The fact that they took the time to look up where every single student was going to college and determine what category they should be in a URM, hook, etc. I don’t think it’s in NCS parent it might be an Ncs girl or someone from another school
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I looked that that Instagram and I am surprised. The OP is correct that the top college admits - basically top 20, save the Chicago unhooked kids, actually do all have hooks. Also so many lackluster colleges. Tulane, BU, BC seems to be the level and “average” unhooked kids will get into. All great top 50 schools but meh? Also multiple (at least 10percent 6/7 kids) students attending random low ranked schools. It was a bad year for admission with record applicants and many schools not looking at standardized testing.
You are so rude.
I think there is an expectation that if a kid does the level of work that is necessary for A's at NCS that she should *at least be in contention* for a college in the tier above Tulane and Boston College. I mean, the school should get at least a couple of kids into schools like Vanderbilt, Rice, Hopkins, Tufts, USC, Northwestern, etc based on academics.
Maybe I am totally off base in 2022.
If you look at the NCS admits, you have the Ivys/Stanford (95% with hooks) and then schools at the level of BC/Tulane/William and Mary. Plus of course the handful of Chicagos. But that's it.
It's just surprising.
NCS takes some of the brightest girls in the DMV and puts them through extreme academic rigor for 4 years. I would hope that girls would be competitive for a top 30 school? Not that they would all get in to the 10-35 schools---but at least SOME? But not this year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If 25 out of a graduation class of 60(?) are going to ivies or Stanford that’s amazing IMO.
It's 13 out of 72. All but 2 of these are athletic recruits, big donor legacy or URMs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My daughter is almost a straight A student in lower high school (a few A minuses). She works really hard for these grades. I've been looking at the college admissions this year and it really seems like you have about 25 girls going ti top colleges and (outside of two girls) ALL are legacy, URM or crew athletes. Then the admissions seem to go off a cliff. thank goodness for u of Chicagj because that seems it be the solo outlier.
I am not looking for an IVY admit (at all) but I'm getting freaked out by the schools that girls outside of the above categories are attending. I won't name names but they're in instagram.
Tell it to my straight. A/a- student.
Did anyone apply their daughter from NCS this year? Where are we looking at?
It takes more than straight A’s to stand out. That is on your daughter to stand out not solely on NCS. Why are you stalking private Instagrams of minor children? That is more concerning to me than college admissions.
This is the thing that OP doesn't understand. Those athletes were outstanding at their sports AND had the same grades or better than OP's kid. You have to be more than a GPA chaser. Stop trashing the athletes. They are, quite simply, more impressive. The most disturbing thing about OP is that she seems to know the legacy status of these kids. How? And definitely looking dowon on POC at NCS. You sound like an ignorant racist OP.
OP here.
My original post said, "my kid is a top academic kid. Where can she expect to get in? It would appear that admissions this year (almost to a person) required a hook on top of good grades".
Nowhere did I say or imply that the athletes or URMs were not worthy of their spots. Stop suggesting otherwise.
My OP is a very reasonable post to ask for those of us (there are many of us) in the school without rowers, minority kids or legacy kids.
Anonymous wrote:This is inexcusable.
With the amount of money we are paying, we expect 95% of the girls go to Top 50, 50% to Top 20, and 15-25% HYPSM.
Anonymous wrote:Not an NCS parent here...all the girls got into College. Wishing them an enjoyable and healthy journey, it is not the end point of life.
Tim Cook (Apple CEO) spoke at Gallaudet commencement; "the question to ask is not 'what will happen' but 'who will I be when it does'."
https://www.instagram.com/tv/Cdlgg34FqA1/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I looked that that Instagram and I am surprised. The OP is correct that the top college admits - basically top 20, save the Chicago unhooked kids, actually do all have hooks. Also so many lackluster colleges. Tulane, BU, BC seems to be the level and “average” unhooked kids will get into. All great top 50 schools but meh? Also multiple (at least 10percent 6/7 kids) students attending random low ranked schools. It was a bad year for admission with record applicants and many schools not looking at standardized testing.
You are so rude.
I think there is an expectation that if a kid does the level of work that is necessary for A's at NCS that she should *at least be in contention* for a college in the tier above Tulane and Boston College. I mean, the school should get at least a couple of kids into schools like Vanderbilt, Rice, Hopkins, Tufts, USC, Northwestern, etc based on academics.
Maybe I am totally off base in 2022.
If you look at the NCS admits, you have the Ivys/Stanford (95% with hooks) and then schools at the level of BC/Tulane/William and Mary. Plus of course the handful of Chicagos. But that's it.
It's just surprising.
NCS takes some of the brightest girls in the DMV and puts them through extreme academic rigor for 4 years. I would hope that girls would be competitive for a top 30 school? Not that they would all get in to the 10-35 schools---but at least SOME? But not this year.
Hon your kid isn’t getting in any top schools and it will be because of you because these posts are grotesque.
The pp is just being a realist. No one is disparaging these kids. I’m sure the kids are awesome and amazing. Just like all kids.