Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Appearance in general seemed to be very important to people when I lived in California. People were on a whole vapid and lacked depth.
Southern women are all for show. So much hair, make up, dresses at football games?!?! Their identity is tied to appearance. Many are heavier now than in the past.
Midwestern women dress very casual. They are the opposite of New York. Not nearly the amount of plastic surgery and medical dermatology.
Hawaii women tend to be large. Not that many attractive women.
European women are generally thinner, but they aren’t fit. More skinny fat. They dress more feminine, but not in crop tops like you see in the US.
Central American women dress very sexy. They like to really emphasis their femininity.
Hawaii is one of the least overweight states in the US. I don't know where you were--maybe hanging out with other tourists?--but the people in Hawaii in general are thin, tan, and natural looking (i.e., not a lot of makeup, casual clothes, unfussy hair). A lot of Asian and mixed-race people, too, so not as homogenous as parts of the mainland US.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just left DC for the C-tier midwest and I’m surprised at how much more attractive the attractive women are here than DC. There are a lot more weird looking pink hair and obese types ofc but the beautiful ones are really beautiful. The opposite is true for WOC here though.
? obesity in the midwest is pretty high.
Yeah but the women who are thin and beautiful are much moreso than the ones in DC. And they aren’t frumpy and overly self-important. As they say, DC is Hollywood for ugly people.
I find that the bell curve of beauty is extremely bi-modal in the south and midwest, and more of a flat butte in the middle for DC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Appearance in general seemed to be very important to people when I lived in California. People were on a whole vapid and lacked depth.
Southern women are all for show. So much hair, make up, dresses at football games?!?! Their identity is tied to appearance. Many are heavier now than in the past.
Midwestern women dress very casual. They are the opposite of New York. Not nearly the amount of plastic surgery and medical dermatology.
Hawaii women tend to be large. Not that many attractive women.
European women are generally thinner, but they aren’t fit. More skinny fat. They dress more feminine, but not in crop tops like you see in the US.
Central American women dress very sexy. They like to really emphasis their femininity.
Hawaii is one of the least overweight states in the US. I don't know where you were--maybe hanging out with other tourists?--but the people in Hawaii in general are thin, tan, and natural looking (i.e., not a lot of makeup, casual clothes, unfussy hair). A lot of Asian and mixed-race people, too, so not as homogenous as parts of the mainland US.
Anonymous wrote:Appearance in general seemed to be very important to people when I lived in California. People were on a whole vapid and lacked depth.
Southern women are all for show. So much hair, make up, dresses at football games?!?! Their identity is tied to appearance. Many are heavier now than in the past.
Midwestern women dress very casual. They are the opposite of New York. Not nearly the amount of plastic surgery and medical dermatology.
Hawaii women tend to be large. Not that many attractive women.
European women are generally thinner, but they aren’t fit. More skinny fat. They dress more feminine, but not in crop tops like you see in the US.
Central American women dress very sexy. They like to really emphasis their femininity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just left DC for the C-tier midwest and I’m surprised at how much more attractive the attractive women are here than DC. There are a lot more weird looking pink hair and obese types ofc but the beautiful ones are really beautiful. The opposite is true for WOC here though.
? obesity in the midwest is pretty high.
Anonymous wrote:Definitely not the DC area.
I'd say, Charleston, Fort Lauderdale and the Gulf region