Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s with the Karen’s on scum who think they have a fundamental right or a say on how random people parent. Who cares, why are you so bothered and so nosy? You know damn well you don’t tell people how to parent and I wish you would to see you get the sh!t beat out of you.
I mean, the thread is soliciting opinions. Of course people are going to comment, isn’t that the point of a message board?
I think 12/13 is helicopter city but if no one is asking for my opinion I wouldn’t be telling a parent I thought that
Anonymous wrote:What’s with the Karen’s on scum who think they have a fundamental right or a say on how random people parent. Who cares, why are you so bothered and so nosy? You know damn well you don’t tell people how to parent and I wish you would to see you get the sh!t beat out of you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:8 or 9 is fine. It never ceases to amaze me how much Americans infantilize their kids.
The problem I have with this isn’t that they are not mature enough at that point. Mine definitely were. It’s that until they are clearly teens in this area adults don’t like unattended children in public and harass them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:National Gallery's policy is officially 12 (https://www.nga.gov/visit/visitor-policies.html) to visit alone. However, I once sent my 12 year old there - we live within walking distance - and the guards wouldn't let him in, saying incorrectly that he had to be 13. But if you're actually in the building, I can't imagine that a well-behaved 10 or 11 year old would have any problems. At the worst, if a staffer asked, he'd just walk back and find you.
I don't know if the Smithsonian has an official policy, but I think similar ages should apply.
Thanks for this information. Very helpful. Also a good reminder when we dealing with the usual boring free range/tighter rope discussions, that often the age limitations come from the organization itself and not parents.
The guards at the National Gallery are horrible. They don’t like children and it’s very clear.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:National Gallery's policy is officially 12 (https://www.nga.gov/visit/visitor-policies.html) to visit alone. However, I once sent my 12 year old there - we live within walking distance - and the guards wouldn't let him in, saying incorrectly that he had to be 13. But if you're actually in the building, I can't imagine that a well-behaved 10 or 11 year old would have any problems. At the worst, if a staffer asked, he'd just walk back and find you.
I don't know if the Smithsonian has an official policy, but I think similar ages should apply.
Thanks for this information. Very helpful. Also a good reminder when we dealing with the usual boring free range/tighter rope discussions, that often the age limitations come from the organization itself and not parents.
Anonymous wrote:8 or 9 is fine. It never ceases to amaze me how much Americans infantilize their kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow. The parents who think their 14 year olds are too precious to visit a museum alone seem REALLY sensitive. LOL!
+1
Crazy people have crazy rules
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow. The parents who think their 14 year olds are too precious to visit a museum alone seem REALLY sensitive. LOL!
+1
Crazy people have crazy rules