Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To keep my kids out of the general population and with kids whose families at least moderately care about academics and future success.
This is the correct answer. My kids are in the top 0.1% of IQ but all I really want is to get them away from the miscreants
Wow—-what an insult to all the children who don’t happen to get in but are great kids.
Anonymous wrote:To keep my kids out of the general population and with kids whose families at least moderately care about academics and future success.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To keep my kids out of the general population and with kids whose families at least moderately care about academics and future success.
This is the correct answer. My kids are in the top 0.1% of IQ but all I really want is to get them away from the miscreants
Anonymous wrote:To keep my kids out of the general population and with kids whose families at least moderately care about academics and future success.
Anonymous wrote:Not a striver by any means, but we did fight like hell to get our kid in AAP. Why? Because they got no attention at our Title I base school. They read fluently but were in kindergarten with kids who had never held a book and did not know the alphabet. Many of these kids were recent immigrants and spoke no English. Do these kids have the right to an education? Absolutely! And I am glad that FCPS is providing it. Socioeconomic diversity is good. But my quiet, well behaved kid was forgotten in a corner doing math worksheets, while the teacher focused on the many other kids who needed help.
Anonymous wrote:I wonder, do parents feel their children get better teachers when in AAP.?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do that many people really go to great lengths, or is it a DCUM thing?
Totally a DCUM thing. And a small percentage of DCUM. I would guess that it is the same 20 or so posters in the TJ threads.
Very few people are focused on AAP. I would guess that the people who are focused on AAP are the people who move to the area for TJ and are very invested in TJ being their kids HS.
Anonymous wrote:Not a striver by any means, but we did fight like hell to get our kid in AAP. Why? Because they got no attention at our Title I base school. They read fluently but were in kindergarten with kids who had never held a book and did not know the alphabet. Many of these kids were recent immigrants and spoke no English. Do these kids have the right to an education? Absolutely! And I am glad that FCPS is providing it. Socioeconomic diversity is good. But my quiet, well behaved kid was forgotten in a corner doing math worksheets, while the teacher focused on the many other kids who needed help.
Anonymous wrote:Not a striver by any means, but we did fight like hell to get our kid in AAP. Why? Because they got no attention at our Title I base school. They read fluently but were in kindergarten with kids who had never held a book and did not know the alphabet. Many of these kids were recent immigrants and spoke no English. Do these kids have the right to an education? Absolutely! And I am glad that FCPS is providing it. Socioeconomic diversity is good. But my quiet, well behaved kid was forgotten in a corner doing math worksheets, while the teacher focused on the many other kids who needed help.
Anonymous wrote:Not a striver by any means, but we did fight like hell to get our kid in AAP. Why? Because they got no attention at our Title I base school. They read fluently but were in kindergarten with kids who had never held a book and did not know the alphabet. Many of these kids were recent immigrants and spoke no English. Do these kids have the right to an education? Absolutely! And I am glad that FCPS is providing it. Socioeconomic diversity is good. But my quiet, well behaved kid was forgotten in a corner doing math worksheets, while the teacher focused on the many other kids who needed help.