Anonymous wrote:Would you feel insulted if a man proposed to you with a cheap engagement ring? Like under $10000 and he makes 300-400k.
Anonymous wrote:I posted about this before but a friend of ours proposed with a cheap ring on purpose so he could judge if his girlfriend (of 4 years!) was materialistic. He said she’d agree to marry him even with a cheap ring. It was also an ugly ring in a yellow gold setting and wasn’t a pear like she liked. She dumped him. She said her proposal wasn’t the time for him to be setting a trap for her. She was pissed that he’d take a romantic moment and turn it into some weird anti materialistic stance. He made over 150k (so did she). We all agreed with her and thought it was particularly nasty and cheap of him. She said she would have said yes to the proposal if there hadn’t been a ring. She didn’t care about how much he’d spent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+1; He sounds like a jerk. He could have gone with a sentimental piece like his mother's ring. Or an inexpensive ring in a design she fancied. Or no rings like in Asia as it isn't a piece of metal that keeps you from cheating. Some men string along the honest kind women who don't manipulate them. Then marry the first golddigger they can find. Read the Johnny Depp thread.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I posted about this before but a friend of ours proposed with a cheap ring on purpose so he could judge if his girlfriend (of 4 years!) was materialistic. He said she’d agree to marry him even with a cheap ring. It was also an ugly ring in a yellow gold setting and wasn’t a pear like she liked. She dumped him. She said her proposal wasn’t the time for him to be setting a trap for her. She was pissed that he’d take a romantic moment and turn it into some weird anti materialistic stance. He made over 150k (so did she). We all agreed with her and thought it was particularly nasty and cheap of him. She said she would have said yes to the proposal if there hadn’t been a ring. She didn’t care about how much he’d spent.
She dodged a bullet.
Sounds like both of you are very materialistic. Buy your own ring.
Anonymous wrote:I always said I'd rather have an engagement car than an engagement ring. 😂
OP, do you actually love the guy, the person, the human from whom you expect a ring? The answer to that question will tell you how much you should care about the ring.
No rings is materialistic according to this DCUM poster.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+1; He sounds like a jerk. He could have gone with a sentimental piece like his mother's ring. Or an inexpensive ring in a design she fancied. Or no rings like in Asia as it isn't a piece of metal that keeps you from cheating. Some men string along the honest kind women who don't manipulate them. Then marry the first golddigger they can find. Read the Johnny Depp thread.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I posted about this before but a friend of ours proposed with a cheap ring on purpose so he could judge if his girlfriend (of 4 years!) was materialistic. He said she’d agree to marry him even with a cheap ring. It was also an ugly ring in a yellow gold setting and wasn’t a pear like she liked. She dumped him. She said her proposal wasn’t the time for him to be setting a trap for her. She was pissed that he’d take a romantic moment and turn it into some weird anti materialistic stance. He made over 150k (so did she). We all agreed with her and thought it was particularly nasty and cheap of him. She said she would have said yes to the proposal if there hadn’t been a ring. She didn’t care about how much he’d spent.
She dodged a bullet.
Sounds like both of you are very materialistic. Buy your own ring.
Anonymous wrote:I posted about this before but a friend of ours proposed with a cheap ring on purpose so he could judge if his girlfriend (of 4 years!) was materialistic. He said she’d agree to marry him even with a cheap ring. It was also an ugly ring in a yellow gold setting and wasn’t a pear like she liked. She dumped him. She said her proposal wasn’t the time for him to be setting a trap for her. She was pissed that he’d take a romantic moment and turn it into some weird anti materialistic stance. He made over 150k (so did she). We all agreed with her and thought it was particularly nasty and cheap of him. She said she would have said yes to the proposal if there hadn’t been a ring. She didn’t care about how much he’d spent.
Anonymous wrote:To be fair to OP, i can see where a small ring could be a source of stress for the wearer in their social circle. Like if you want to hang out at The Club with a bunch of pretentious b’s, your small ring might be out of place. So in that case I’d spend the money to get a great CZ or something. If that’s important to you.
But actually spending a lot on a ring seems crazy. I’d much rather have a down payment on a house.
I got a family ring and people used to tell me all the time to “make” DH buy me a ring too, but that would actually have made us not be able to buy our house. That seems ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:+1; He sounds like a jerk. He could have gone with a sentimental piece like his mother's ring. Or an inexpensive ring in a design she fancied. Or no rings like in Asia as it isn't a piece of metal that keeps you from cheating. Some men string along the honest kind women who don't manipulate them. Then marry the first golddigger they can find. Read the Johnny Depp thread.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I posted about this before but a friend of ours proposed with a cheap ring on purpose so he could judge if his girlfriend (of 4 years!) was materialistic. He said she’d agree to marry him even with a cheap ring. It was also an ugly ring in a yellow gold setting and wasn’t a pear like she liked. She dumped him. She said her proposal wasn’t the time for him to be setting a trap for her. She was pissed that he’d take a romantic moment and turn it into some weird anti materialistic stance. He made over 150k (so did she). We all agreed with her and thought it was particularly nasty and cheap of him. She said she would have said yes to the proposal if there hadn’t been a ring. She didn’t care about how much he’d spent.
She dodged a bullet.
Anonymous wrote:Would you feel insulted if a man proposed to you with a cheap engagement ring? Like under $10000 and he makes 300-400k.
+1; He sounds like a jerk. He could have gone with a sentimental piece like his mother's ring. Or an inexpensive ring in a design she fancied. Or no rings like in Asia as it isn't a piece of metal that keeps you from cheating. Some men string along the honest kind women who don't manipulate them. Then marry the first golddigger they can find. Read the Johnny Depp thread.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I posted about this before but a friend of ours proposed with a cheap ring on purpose so he could judge if his girlfriend (of 4 years!) was materialistic. He said she’d agree to marry him even with a cheap ring. It was also an ugly ring in a yellow gold setting and wasn’t a pear like she liked. She dumped him. She said her proposal wasn’t the time for him to be setting a trap for her. She was pissed that he’d take a romantic moment and turn it into some weird anti materialistic stance. He made over 150k (so did she). We all agreed with her and thought it was particularly nasty and cheap of him. She said she would have said yes to the proposal if there hadn’t been a ring. She didn’t care about how much he’d spent.
She dodged a bullet.