Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are two kinds of people who get all up in arms about "no kid" weddings.
1. Those who think their own kid is the Christ Child.
2. Those who don't spend enough time with their kids to not feel guilty about ditching them for a fun weekend.
In fairness it would be extremely entertaining to watch him flipping tables at the reception when he finds out that he's seated next to a banker.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: My own dd is having a no kids wedding (aside from her 7yo sister and the ring bearer). It's her and future dh's choice.
I had kids at my wedding, that was MY choice.
I do understand not having anyone to watch the kids-if my cousins had a no kid wedding, I would not have been able to go because anyone who'd watch the kids, would be AT the wedding.
That's weird. If you don't want kids at the reception, why include them in the ceremony?
It's not weird...the flower girl is my 7yo dd (same mom and dad) and the ring bearer is her fiance's nephew. Of course the bride's SISTER, who is a child, will be there!
A wedding doesn't magically become appropriate for kids because of the blood tie between the bride or groom and the kid.
Ring bearers are ridiculous, but it's especially goofy to decide that there is One Chosen Nephew who needs to be there and any other young relatives would ruin things.
Have whatever wedding you like, but apply a little logical consistency.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: My own dd is having a no kids wedding (aside from her 7yo sister and the ring bearer). It's her and future dh's choice.
I had kids at my wedding, that was MY choice.
I do understand not having anyone to watch the kids-if my cousins had a no kid wedding, I would not have been able to go because anyone who'd watch the kids, would be AT the wedding.
That's weird. If you don't want kids at the reception, why include them in the ceremony?
It's not weird...the flower girl is my 7yo dd (same mom and dad) and the ring bearer is her fiance's nephew. Of course the bride's SISTER, who is a child, will be there!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: My own dd is having a no kids wedding (aside from her 7yo sister and the ring bearer). It's her and future dh's choice.
I had kids at my wedding, that was MY choice.
I do understand not having anyone to watch the kids-if my cousins had a no kid wedding, I would not have been able to go because anyone who'd watch the kids, would be AT the wedding.
That's weird. If you don't want kids at the reception, why include them in the ceremony?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are two kinds of people who get all up in arms about "no kid" weddings.
1. Those who think their own kid is the Christ Child.
2. Those who don't spend enough time with their kids to not feel guilty about ditching them for a fun weekend.
In fairness it would be extremely entertaining to watch him flipping tables at the reception when he finds out that he's seated next to a banker.
Anonymous wrote: My own dd is having a no kids wedding (aside from her 7yo sister and the ring bearer). It's her and future dh's choice.
I had kids at my wedding, that was MY choice.
I do understand not having anyone to watch the kids-if my cousins had a no kid wedding, I would not have been able to go because anyone who'd watch the kids, would be AT the wedding.
Anonymous wrote:My cousin is inviting only some cousins in our generation. Chose not to include those 5 and under and the adults living out of state on their own who they haven’t seen in years. Do you think that is rude?
Anonymous wrote:There are two kinds of people who get all up in arms about "no kid" weddings.
1. Those who think their own kid is the Christ Child.
2. Those who don't spend enough time with their kids to not feel guilty about ditching them for a fun weekend.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of my cousins had no kids weddings out of town. I send a nice gift and decline.
The only problem arises when then they (or other family members) try to put pressure on you and complain about your choice - I've had one wedding where it was going to be somewhere rural, so we'd have to fly and then rent a car to drive to the wedding venue for over an hour. It was a no child wedding for all the events over two days and I had no interest in either leaving my husband and kids or flying with everyone to only then try to find a babysitter in an unfamiliar place in the middle of nowhere and leave the kids alone for the bulk of two days. The amount of pushback I got on that from various family members soured me on the whole thing. But if your cousin is not doing that, then all you should do is be gracious, send a nice present, and count all the money you saved in not going.