Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCUM loves to quote USNWR stats. Well look at this one:
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
Even here Michigan is top 20. #13 actually. So not “many schools” have better undergraduate quality than Michigan. Michigan has virtually no weakness as an academic institution. Yes even comparable to most of the Ivies.
Michigan is a good school but it is maybe way too large with its 40000+ student body and large class sizes (200+ in every classes) for some kids to handle.
There is no difference between an in person class with 200 students and online class with 1 million students. Might as well listen to a free online class from top schools like MIT
Anonymous wrote:honestly for that major, I think graduate school is likely in her future, so I'd go cheaper for undergrad for practical reasons.
But, this is a decision that has to fit your kid. Those schools are very different. Surely one of them feels like a better fit than the others (or at least a top 2 and bottom 2). No one can give that answer.
I'd flip the thinking - you often hear someone say something like, all things being equal, go to the highest ranked most prestigious school. But, those schools are all good. Consider that the equal - all 4 schools are roughly academically equal, so pick based on intangibles, what feels right.
Anonymous wrote:Either Michigan or WM (the kids I know who've gone to Northeastern have been disappointed in the coop program, and have had difficulty in the job market)
I'm prejudiced toward WM because my kid went there and had a great experience, and the Monroe Scholar opportunity at WM is a big deal.
But if your DC wants the whole big time college experience of football games and nice college town, then you can't beat Michigan.
Does she want big or smaller?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCUM loves to quote USNWR stats. Well look at this one:
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
Even here Michigan is top 20. #13 actually. So not “many schools” have better undergraduate quality than Michigan. Michigan has virtually no weakness as an academic institution. Yes even comparable to most of the Ivies.
Michigan is a good school but it is maybe way too large with its 40000+ student body and large class sizes (200+ in every classes) for some kids to handle.
There is no difference between an in person class with 200 students and online class with 1 million students. Might as well listen to a free online class from top schools like MIT
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCUM loves to quote USNWR stats. Well look at this one:
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
Even here Michigan is top 20. #13 actually. So not “many schools” have better undergraduate quality than Michigan. Michigan has virtually no weakness as an academic institution. Yes even comparable to most of the Ivies.
Michigan is a good school but it is maybe way too large with its 40000+ student body and large class sizes (200+ in every classes) for some kids to handle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCUM loves to quote USNWR stats. Well look at this one:
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
Even here Michigan is top 20. #13 actually. So not “many schools” have better undergraduate quality than Michigan. Michigan has virtually no weakness as an academic institution. Yes even comparable to most of the Ivies.
How ironic that W&M is ranked several spots better than Michigan in the ranking you linked.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCUM loves to quote USNWR stats. Well look at this one:
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
Even here Michigan is top 20. #13 actually. So not “many schools” have better undergraduate quality than Michigan. Michigan has virtually no weakness as an academic institution. Yes even comparable to most of the Ivies.
How ironic that W&M is ranked several spots better than Michigan in the ranking you linked.
Yeah, but W&M is not also a world-class research university.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCUM loves to quote USNWR stats. Well look at this one:
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
Even here Michigan is top 20. #13 actually. So not “many schools” have better undergraduate quality than Michigan. Michigan has virtually no weakness as an academic institution. Yes even comparable to most of the Ivies.
How ironic that W&M is ranked several spots better than Michigan in the ranking you linked.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCUM loves to quote USNWR stats. Well look at this one:
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
Even here Michigan is top 20. #13 actually. So not “many schools” have better undergraduate quality than Michigan. Michigan has virtually no weakness as an academic institution. Yes even comparable to most of the Ivies.
Michigan is a good school but it is maybe way too large with its 40000+ student body and large class sizes (200+ in every classes) for some kids to handle.
Anonymous wrote:DCUM loves to quote USNWR stats. Well look at this one:
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
Even here Michigan is top 20. #13 actually. So not “many schools” have better undergraduate quality than Michigan. Michigan has virtually no weakness as an academic institution. Yes even comparable to most of the Ivies.
Anonymous wrote:DCUM loves to quote USNWR stats. Well look at this one:
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/undergraduate-teaching
Even here Michigan is top 20. #13 actually. So not “many schools” have better undergraduate quality than Michigan. Michigan has virtually no weakness as an academic institution. Yes even comparable to most of the Ivies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Considering U Michigan (OOS), W&M Monroe Scholars (OOS), Lafayette ($25,000/yr merit) and Northeastern ($20,00 merit/yr) for Poly Sci/Econ
If cost is not a factor, I'd say go with Michigan. Head and shoulders above the other 3 options.
OMG, this stuff never ends. A - U Mich is not head and shoulders above the other 3 options, and B - it's irrelevant -- these are not Ivies - your kid should go where they will be most lively to thrive!
It's no wonder why so many college kids are stressed, unhappy and ultimately transfer schools - they focus on the wrong things in their decision process!!! A happy and engaged kid will be more likely to excel in their academics, but more importantly will grow into the person who can excel in life!
Nationally, yes it is. It is a legit top 20 school with virtually every program in the top 10. Sure, if you want to be in the Mid-Atlantic then Lafayette or W&M are fine - both great schools. Michigan is a powerhouse and has the reputation and alumni network to back it up.
Those are really graduate rankings. This is undergraduate. Many schools may have better undergraduate quality and experience than Michigan.