Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, this is the honeymoon stage when you would typically be very into eachother. I think you should go for it! Sex is an important component of a relationship. I personally would want to see if I was compatible in bed before making a commitment. I'm actually shocked anyone at 40 would spend 3 months acting like partners, but not having sex. Him wanting to have sex before labeling you as his girlfriend does not make him a player.
OP: There's no question that we're sexually compatible. We regularly spend 3 hours in bed in the mornings being physically intimate (everything but sex) and the chemistry is off the charts. I don't think he is waiting to figure out if we're compatible before agreeing to be in a relationship. So, that makes me even more confused.
It sounds as though you are already engaged in sexual activities with him but just no PIV intercourse. Technically, you are already having sex with him. Saying only PIV intercourse is sex sounds very high schoolish.
Agree. I personally feel oral is more intimate than PIV. Does seem like a game if you are doing everything but. Have you asked to be in an exclusive relationship? What was his response?
Anonymous wrote:He will wait for you if he likes you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think he wants to “take things slow” because that expands his time to play the field. I wouldn’t sleep with someone sleeping with other people because that is where diseases come from.
Op: he said he’s not dating anyone else.
Anonymous wrote:You are 40, but you act like you are still virginal, OP. You are not young, you are a middle aged woman with life experience. 4-0. You are no longer able to demand high prices like you are still 20. You need to do it or let him go. I am surprised this 40-year-old man has stuck around for three months. I'm guessing he is also talking to other women and keeping his options open.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, this is the honeymoon stage when you would typically be very into eachother. I think you should go for it! Sex is an important component of a relationship. I personally would want to see if I was compatible in bed before making a commitment. I'm actually shocked anyone at 40 would spend 3 months acting like partners, but not having sex. Him wanting to have sex before labeling you as his girlfriend does not make him a player.
OP: There's no question that we're sexually compatible. We regularly spend 3 hours in bed in the mornings being physically intimate (everything but sex) and the chemistry is off the charts. I don't think he is waiting to figure out if we're compatible before agreeing to be in a relationship. So, that makes me even more confused.
It sounds as though you are already engaged in sexual activities with him but just no PIV intercourse. Technically, you are already having sex with him. Saying only PIV intercourse is sex sounds very high schoolish.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, this is the honeymoon stage when you would typically be very into eachother. I think you should go for it! Sex is an important component of a relationship. I personally would want to see if I was compatible in bed before making a commitment. I'm actually shocked anyone at 40 would spend 3 months acting like partners, but not having sex. Him wanting to have sex before labeling you as his girlfriend does not make him a player.
OP: There's no question that we're sexually compatible. We regularly spend 3 hours in bed in the mornings being physically intimate (everything but sex) and the chemistry is off the charts. I don't think he is waiting to figure out if we're compatible before agreeing to be in a relationship. So, that makes me even more confused.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, this is the honeymoon stage when you would typically be very into eachother. I think you should go for it! Sex is an important component of a relationship. I personally would want to see if I was compatible in bed before making a commitment. I'm actually shocked anyone at 40 would spend 3 months acting like partners, but not having sex. Him wanting to have sex before labeling you as his girlfriend does not make him a player.
OP: There's no question that we're sexually compatible. We regularly spend 3 hours in bed in the mornings being physically intimate (everything but sex) and the chemistry is off the charts. I don't think he is waiting to figure out if we're compatible before agreeing to be in a relationship. So, that makes me even more confused.
Anonymous wrote:OP’s boyfriend is being punished for being honest. He could just lie and say he wants a relationship to get the sex he wants. He obviously likes OP because he is exclusive for Three months with no sex, when he could be out screwing other women who don’t have OP’s hangups. Yet OP is creating an arbitrary means to sabotage her own relationship and it will therefore eventually end badly.
Anonymous wrote:You are 40, but you act like you are still virginal, OP. You are not young, you are a middle aged woman with life experience. 4-0. You are no longer able to demand high prices like you are still 20. You need to do it or let him go. I am surprised this 40-year-old man has stuck around for three months. I'm guessing he is also talking to other women and keeping his options open.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, this is the honeymoon stage when you would typically be very into eachother. I think you should go for it! Sex is an important component of a relationship. I personally would want to see if I was compatible in bed before making a commitment. I'm actually shocked anyone at 40 would spend 3 months acting like partners, but not having sex. Him wanting to have sex before labeling you as his girlfriend does not make him a player.
OP: There's no question that we're sexually compatible. We regularly spend 3 hours in bed in the mornings being physically intimate (everything but sex) and the chemistry is off the charts. I don't think he is waiting to figure out if we're compatible before agreeing to be in a relationship. So, that makes me even more confused.