Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She’s awful. I was really disappointed that she got such positive attention in the media and yes among college-educated women too for that Lean In b.s.
+100
I don't get the hate for her. She's awesome in my eyes. A average-looking women who presents as radiant, an amazing and loyal employee, formerly at Google and the Treasury Secretary, a self-made billionaire, Harvard educated, and a successful mom of two. She's everything DCUM says a woman should be.
By “self made,” you mean “came from a wealthy family and then had a years-long affair with Larry Summers.” Larry and his connections and introductions are the long and short of why she is where she is, but you won’t read that tip in “Lean In.”
Okay, his connections got her jobs at Google and Facebook. But she worked those jobs for 20 years. What's wrong with that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone circle Nancy to Peter Thiel’s role in this?
I’m the PP who wrote about Peter Thiel taking the opportunity of Larry Summers’ head-first leap from grace to go for Sheryl Sandberg’s jugular. If you know about the ongoing power struggle at Meta, that nasty pension fund lawsuit in Delaware, and how Thiel ended up stepping down from Meta’s board when he’s the reason Facebook got off the ground, then it should be REALLY obvious why Peter has some scores to settle and with whom. Peter’s vindictiveness is legendary. This is only the beginning.
Anonymous wrote:Can someone circle Nancy to Peter Thiel’s role in this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of course she is not a saint, and she is “conniving” and “ruthless.” Why would anyone think otherwise? Does anyone expect Jeff Bezos or Steve Jobs to be nice guys? Obviously not. She is not above critique for her actual performance, but the commentary about her style is so clearly gendered.
Shut up. Bezos, Jobs, Musk, Gates and others are/were conniving, ruthless, narcissistic, avaricious, and borderline sociopathic…and we know this because people say so!! What’s “gendered” is that Sandberg insulated her vicious, cold blooded ways from criticism for years by playing the sexism card. It was part of the nauseating to see this cruel hypocrite, who washes out other women without a second thought, positioning herself as a defender of women’s rights and writing that stupid f—king book ”Lean In.” A man wouldn’t have gotten away with that kind of flagrant charlatanism. It’s absolutely fair to call her out for all of her miserable ways.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of course she is not a saint, and she is “conniving” and “ruthless.” Why would anyone think otherwise? Does anyone expect Jeff Bezos or Steve Jobs to be nice guys? Obviously not. She is not above critique for her actual performance, but the commentary about her style is so clearly gendered.
Shut up. Bezos, Jobs, Musk, Gates and others are/were conniving, ruthless, narcissistic, avaricious, and borderline sociopathic…and we know this because people say so!! What’s “gendered” is that Sandberg insulated her vicious, cold blooded ways from criticism for years by playing the sexism card. It was part of the nauseating to see this cruel hypocrite, who washes out other women without a second thought, positioning herself as a defender of women’s rights and writing that stupid f—king book ”Lean In.” A man wouldn’t have gotten away with that kind of flagrant charlatanism. It’s absolutely fair to call her out for all of her miserable ways.
Anonymous wrote:Of course she is not a saint, and she is “conniving” and “ruthless.” Why would anyone think otherwise? Does anyone expect Jeff Bezos or Steve Jobs to be nice guys? Obviously not. She is not above critique for her actual performance, but the commentary about her style is so clearly gendered.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She’s awful. I was really disappointed that she got such positive attention in the media and yes among college-educated women too for that Lean In b.s.
+100
I don't get the hate for her. She's awesome in my eyes. A average-looking women who presents as radiant, an amazing and loyal employee, formerly at Google and the Treasury Secretary, a self-made billionaire, Harvard educated, and a successful mom of two. She's everything DCUM says a woman should be.
By “self made,” you mean “came from a wealthy family and then had a years-long affair with Larry Summers.” Larry and his connections and introductions are the long and short of why she is where she is, but you won’t read that tip in “Lean In.”
Did she? I thought he was just a mentor, but maybe I'm being naive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She’s awful. I was really disappointed that she got such positive attention in the media and yes among college-educated women too for that Lean In b.s.
+100
I don't get the hate for her. She's awesome in my eyes. A average-looking women who presents as radiant, an amazing and loyal employee, formerly at Google and the Treasury Secretary, a self-made billionaire, Harvard educated, and a successful mom of two. She's everything DCUM says a woman should be.
By “self made,” you mean “came from a wealthy family and then had a years-long affair with Larry Summers.” Larry and his connections and introductions are the long and short of why she is where she is, but you won’t read that tip in “Lean In.”
Okay, his connections got her jobs at Google and Facebook. But she worked those jobs for 20 years. What's wrong with that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She’s awful. I was really disappointed that she got such positive attention in the media and yes among college-educated women too for that Lean In b.s.
+100
I don't get the hate for her. She's awesome in my eyes. A average-looking women who presents as radiant, an amazing and loyal employee, formerly at Google and the Treasury Secretary, a self-made billionaire, Harvard educated, and a successful mom of two. She's everything DCUM says a woman should be.
By “self made,” you mean “came from a wealthy family and then had a years-long affair with Larry Summers.” Larry and his connections and introductions are the long and short of why she is where she is, but you won’t read that tip in “Lean In.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She’s awful. I was really disappointed that she got such positive attention in the media and yes among college-educated women too for that Lean In b.s.
+100
I don't get the hate for her. She's awesome in my eyes. A average-looking women who presents as radiant, an amazing and loyal employee, formerly at Google and the Treasury Secretary, a self-made billionaire, Harvard educated, and a successful mom of two. She's everything DCUM says a woman should be.
By “self made,” you mean “came from a wealthy family and then had a years-long affair with Larry Summers.” Larry and his connections and introductions are the long and short of why she is where she is, but you won’t read that tip in “Lean In.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She’s awful. I was really disappointed that she got such positive attention in the media and yes among college-educated women too for that Lean In b.s.
+100
I don't get the hate for her. She's awesome in my eyes. A average-looking women who presents as radiant, an amazing and loyal employee, formerly at Google and the Treasury Secretary, a self-made billionaire, Harvard educated, and a successful mom of two. She's everything DCUM says a woman should be.