Anonymous wrote:I think she is getting more of a cold shoulder than she ever expected in FL. No one wants to be near them.
Anonymous wrote:Melania trump was not a working model. The only pictures of her pre-Trump are black and white photos of her as a teen and the nudes from NYC (no shade, nudes are great).
I think she was what's called a glamour model. It's a B or C grade model, something that's on the same level of instagram models these days. That means that she did some dull catalog work along with lingerie, lifestyle magazines and semi-nude photos.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guys, she was a high end prostitute. End of story.
The myth that she was a true working model is bullcrap.
Who cares?
Because the Republicans live a double standard. Because she was our first lady - and most strive to be role models. Because I expect a woman with such great visibility to have had a better impact on the representation of women. She was a setback to women, the role of the 1st lady, and class.
Not unlike yourself.
Feel free to not post if you don't care. And also, no one else on here is/was a FLOTUs. We are talking about the FLOTUS. Remember when some Rs scoffed at the former FLOTUS wearing a sleeveless dress? But, apparently, we should not care that the former FLOTUS was basically a prostitute.
DP
Who cares? You lose credibility with the low level argument of the “prostitute term.” She is not the flotus and hasn’t been for some time now. It’s okay. There are big and important things to be concerned about, this is not one. Move on!
We care. She's a bizarre public figure. It's normal to talk about bizarre public figures. Have you ever visited the entertainment and pop culture forum?
Again, move on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Soooo what!
Well, it’s just an incredible lie for no reason. She could just say she was “working as model” which I’m sure is true. They don’t have to say she was a successful fashion model because she simply wasn’t. It’s crazy because there are PHOTOS of successful fashion models. No one would care either way. So it’s just remarkable to create and maintain a fictional biography for no reason.
Again, so what!
Anonymous wrote:Let's cut Melania a break, she has earned every penny having to sleep with that fat, gross old nutter. She has paid in spades for her immoral choices. Her life must be hell.
Melania trump was not a working model. The only pictures of her pre-Trump are black and white photos of her as a teen and the nudes from NYC (no shade, nudes are great).
Anonymous wrote:Stop feeding this troll who keeps coming up with these 'snappy' comebacks, defending his precious Melania. As for posting the Harper's cover shot - you just gave him more material to jack off to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think she is getting more of a cold shoulder than she ever expected in FL. No one wants to be near them
agreed. I mean, why would they?
Lots would.
for what reason? The only thing I would think about someone who hung around them was "red-neck."
Anonymous wrote:I read she was on the cover of Italian Bogie and Bulgaria’s Harpers Bazaar. And that she worked with two well known photographers.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think she is getting more of a cold shoulder than she ever expected in FL. No one wants to be near them
agreed. I mean, why would they?
Lots would.
Anonymous wrote:I think she is getting more of a cold shoulder than she ever expected in FL. No one wants to be near them
agreed. I mean, why would they?
I think she is getting more of a cold shoulder than she ever expected in FL. No one wants to be near them
Anonymous wrote:I think she is getting more of a cold shoulder than she ever expected in FL. No one wants to be near them.
Anonymous wrote:She had been laying awfully low lately. Let’s speculate on how much negotiation would take place before she’d go back to the White House.