Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DP - there is NO WAY IN HELL I will vote for any incumbents.
If I see any of their names on the ballot (Wolff, Silvestre, Docca, Evans, Harris, Joftus, Smondrowski), the other candidate will get my vote no matter what.
Your post displays your ignorance of who's even up for reelection.
Anonymous wrote:DP - there is NO WAY IN HELL I will vote for any incumbents.
If I see any of their names on the ballot (Wolff, Silvestre, Docca, Evans, Harris, Joftus, Smondrowski), the other candidate will get my vote no matter what.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, you’re not wrong. All the candidates are awful. But I'll never vote for Wolff or Coll, so Iannaco-Hahn it is. And I shudder to think that I might have to vote for Silvestre, given that Fryar seems mentally unstable and Giandomenico doesn't seem capable of substantive thought.
Coll seems like the clear choice in this race.
Coll is anti-gifted programs and acceleration. May not matter to some people of course.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, you’re not wrong. All the candidates are awful. But I'll never vote for Wolff or Coll, so Iannaco-Hahn it is. And I shudder to think that I might have to vote for Silvestre, given that Fryar seems mentally unstable and Giandomenico doesn't seem capable of substantive thought.
Coll seems like the clear choice in this race.
Coll is anti-gifted programs and acceleration. May not matter to some people of course.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, you’re not wrong. All the candidates are awful. But I'll never vote for Wolff or Coll, so Iannaco-Hahn it is. And I shudder to think that I might have to vote for Silvestre, given that Fryar seems mentally unstable and Giandomenico doesn't seem capable of substantive thought.
Coll seems like the clear choice in this race.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As awful as they might seem, the removal of SROs and the dilution of academic rigor by the current board is the true embarrassment.
I'll vote for the crazies. At least they might shake things up a bit.
And, both of those are partly to blame by the activist parents who don't believe in homework or their kids should struggle. Basically they cannot be bothered so what happens at school needs to stay at school.
Really activist parents who don’t believe in homework or a school system that believes in the studies that determine how much homework should be give. At each level?? And be careful, some of those people who don’t want to do homework when there kids come home after school are your neighbors.
And, that is why my neighbors are complaining their kids are struggling. Without practice it’s hard to get good at math or writing or much else.
Anonymous wrote:As awful as they might seem, the removal of SROs and the dilution of academic rigor by the current board is the true embarrassment.
I'll vote for the crazies. At least they might shake things up a bit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As awful as they might seem, the removal of SROs and the dilution of academic rigor by the current board is the true embarrassment.
I'll vote for the crazies. At least they might shake things up a bit.
And, both of those are partly to blame by the activist parents who don't believe in homework or their kids should struggle. Basically they cannot be bothered so what happens at school needs to stay at school.
Really activist parents who don’t believe in homework or a school system that believes in the studies that determine how much homework should be give. At each level?? And be careful, some of those people who don’t want to do homework when there kids come home after school are your neighbors.
Anonymous wrote:Disappointing after the past 2 shitshow years we only managed to get 2 primaries out of the hundred of thousands of parents.
We get what we deserve.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As awful as they might seem, the removal of SROs and the dilution of academic rigor by the current board is the true embarrassment.
I'll vote for the crazies. At least they might shake things up a bit.
And, both of those are partly to blame by the activist parents who don't believe in homework or their kids should struggle. Basically they cannot be bothered so what happens at school needs to stay at school.
Anonymous wrote:As awful as they might seem, the removal of SROs and the dilution of academic rigor by the current board is the true embarrassment.
I'll vote for the crazies. At least they might shake things up a bit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Disappointing after the past 2 shitshow years we only managed to get 2 primaries out of the hundred of thousands of parents.
We get what we deserve.
Who in their right mind want's to wear the target that BoE members have on their backs?
Exactly. You get paid $25,000 a year to go to he's incredibly long meetings and have random people from the public harass you constantly. The pay only works if you are retired or have somebody else who is a breadwinner and the time commitment is very steep for most parents with young children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Disappointing after the past 2 shitshow years we only managed to get 2 primaries out of the hundred of thousands of parents.
We get what we deserve.
Who in their right mind want's to wear the target that BoE members have on their backs?