Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Preppy is American. It's not for everyone.

But why it is necessary to put it down? It doesn't hurt anyone to dress preppy.

Actually, khaki and pastel look better on light brown hair and blue jeans/shirts compliment blue eyes. It is usually fine, however if an expectation is set it can be abused. You've obviously never gone two years wearing ankle length skirts and then the day after you win an award, the guy who failed at that assignment for two years tries to ban all skirts. It is fine until someone complains about a shapely woman getting a male gaze not wearing pants&white/blue shirts, when others are in bikinis and hot pants but not as much of a "threat" go free.

WTF did I even read here?

Banning skirts? What are you talking about?

Fifty-second fish maw.

I need to find that thread. The light brown hair and blue eye matching is a total headscratcher.

A special little treat: https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/404239.page

The real headscratcher for me is the garbled warbling about skirts and jealous (?) men and hotpants. WTF?

Thank you! Lol That is, indeed, a treat! As a relative newcomer, I really enjoy these gems!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Preppy is American. It's not for everyone.

But why it is necessary to put it down? It doesn't hurt anyone to dress preppy.

Actually, khaki and pastel look better on light brown hair and blue jeans/shirts compliment blue eyes. It is usually fine, however if an expectation is set it can be abused. You've obviously never gone two years wearing ankle length skirts and then the day after you win an award, the guy who failed at that assignment for two years tries to ban all skirts. It is fine until someone complains about a shapely woman getting a male gaze not wearing pants&white/blue shirts, when others are in bikinis and hot pants but not as much of a "threat" go free.

WTF did I even read here?

Banning skirts? What are you talking about?

Fifty-second fish maw.

I need to find that thread. The light brown hair and blue eye matching is a total headscratcher.

A special little treat: https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/404239.page

The real headscratcher for me is the garbled warbling about skirts and jealous (?) men and hotpants. WTF?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have never really understood American's obsession with and aspiring to look preppy aesthetic in their sartorial choices. I think the look is dated, constricting, unimaginative and very provincial. To me it gives me a sense that someone has not traveled very much beyond America or certain American enclaves and is not very sophisticated.

And this is how we feel about Germans and their green jeans, the English and their ridiculous hats, the French and their too bright red lipstick, etc...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Preppy is American. It's not for everyone.

But why it is necessary to put it down? It doesn't hurt anyone to dress preppy.

Actually, khaki and pastel look better on light brown hair and blue jeans/shirts compliment blue eyes. It is usually fine, however if an expectation is set it can be abused. You've obviously never gone two years wearing ankle length skirts and then the day after you win an award, the guy who failed at that assignment for two years tries to ban all skirts. It is fine until someone complains about a shapely woman getting a male gaze not wearing pants&white/blue shirts, when others are in bikinis and hot pants but not as much of a "threat" go free.

WTF did I even read here?

Banning skirts? What are you talking about?

Fifty-second fish maw.

I need to find that thread. The light brown hair and blue eye matching is a total headscratcher.

Anonymous wrote:I have never really understood American's obsession with and aspiring to look preppy aesthetic in their sartorial choices. I think the look is dated, constricting, unimaginative and very provincial. To me it gives me a sense that someone has not traveled very much beyond America or certain American enclaves and is not very sophisticated.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Preppy is American. It's not for everyone.

But why it is necessary to put it down? It doesn't hurt anyone to dress preppy.

Actually, khaki and pastel look better on light brown hair and blue jeans/shirts compliment blue eyes. It is usually fine, however if an expectation is set it can be abused. You've obviously never gone two years wearing ankle length skirts and then the day after you win an award, the guy who failed at that assignment for two years tries to ban all skirts. It is fine until someone complains about a shapely woman getting a male gaze not wearing pants&white/blue shirts, when others are in bikinis and hot pants but not as much of a "threat" go free.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can you imagine someone in boat shoes and a garish pink polo walking the streets of Milan?

Better than the ridiculous Little House on the Prairie fashion the upper-crust in Britain and Europe have going on.

Anonymous wrote:

Also rich American women:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Preppy is American. It's not for everyone.

But why it is necessary to put it down? It doesn't hurt anyone to dress preppy.

Actually, khaki and pastel look better on light brown hair and blue jeans/shirts compliment blue eyes. It is usually fine, however if an expectation is set it can be abused. You've obviously never gone two years wearing ankle length skirts and then the day after you win an award, the guy who failed at that assignment for two years tries to ban all skirts. It is fine until someone complains about a shapely woman getting a male gaze not wearing pants&white/blue shirts, when others are in bikinis and hot pants but not as much of a "threat" go free.

WTF did I even read here?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Preppy is American. It's not for everyone.

But why it is necessary to put it down? It doesn't hurt anyone to dress preppy.

Actually, khaki and pastel look better on light brown hair and blue jeans/shirts compliment blue eyes. It is usually fine, however if an expectation is set it can be abused. You've obviously never gone two years wearing ankle length skirts and then the day after you win an award, the guy who failed at that assignment for two years tries to ban all skirts. It is fine until someone complains about a shapely woman getting a male gaze not wearing pants&white/blue shirts, when others are in bikinis and hot pants but not as much of a "threat" go free.

WTF did I even read here?

Banning skirts? What are you talking about?

Fifty-second fish maw.

Anonymous wrote:Preppy is American. It's not for everyone.

But why it is necessary to put it down? It doesn't hurt anyone to dress preppy.

Anonymous wrote:The Us Olympic team in preppy RL always looks great at the opening ceremonies!

Anonymous wrote:High quality preppy clothing will always look good. Americans, Europeans, affluent South Americans, etc. trend preppy.

Preppy = Classic

Trendy = Low Class (even if it's expensive)

The only difference I notice in European preppy is they wear tighter, shorter clothes (I'm referring to the men). Boat shoes or driving mocs, it's all the same.

PS - Stop hating on Vineyard Vines. Their clothing is very comfortable and washes well. I think their polos last longer than Ralph Lauren (which has been hit or miss; some of their polos seem cut weird) and their t-shirts are super soft. Lacoste tends to shrink and run small.