Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This seems like a silly chain. What's the point?
They do this every year. I feel like it just gives some false hope for those that are waitlisted.
How is it false hope? If you see a bunch of people turning down your first choose and you are waitlisted, it absolutely means there is a chance you’ll get a call. Seems like logic to me. Not hope.
Anonymous wrote:Turning down SS, Waldorf, Green Acres and Norwood. Attending Bullis for K.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Declining Holton, Stone Ridge, Bullis, SSSAS for 9th
Where are you accepting?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This seems like a silly chain. What's the point?
They do this every year. I feel like it just gives some false hope for those that are waitlisted.
How is it false hope? If you see a bunch of people turning down your first choose and you are waitlisted, it absolutely means there is a chance you’ll get a call. Seems like logic to me. Not hope.
Schools know their typical yield and account for it in their admission numbers. It doesn’t mean they won’t go to their waitpools, but just because you see that 10 people are declining spots for 9th at X school doesn’t mean there will be spots. School X likely over-admitted by 20 or so.
Anonymous wrote:Declining Holton, Stone Ridge, Bullis, SSSAS for 9th
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Declining Sidwell, SR, Bullis and Holton for 3rd
Is 3rd even an entry year for any of these??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This seems like a silly chain. What's the point?
They do this every year. I feel like it just gives some false hope for those that are waitlisted.
How is it false hope? If you see a bunch of people turning down your first choose and you are waitlisted, it absolutely means there is a chance you’ll get a call. Seems like logic to me. Not hope.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This seems like a silly chain. What's the point?
They do this every year. I feel like it just gives some false hope for those that are waitlisted.
Anonymous wrote:This seems like a silly chain. What's the point?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Declining St. Patrick’s
For where? We are declining as well