Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do public schools still allow sports teams that have try outs / cut players? Why can’t everybody be on the team if they choose?
Because you can't have a 50 person tennis team
Or a 40 roster varsity soccer team
Etc.
Why not? It is time to rewrite the so-called rules.
No, kids need ot learn and understand what being better than others means. Should we give everyone the job who submits a resume? Everyone gets to be on the debate team?
If the justification for sports is about it being part of a well rounded education then teams should be no cut. Otherwise, just let kids play club. FWIW, my kids play high school and club, but I think it's hypocritical when schools talk about the value of athletics and then cut the majority of kids who show up for tryouts [/qu.ote]
Or they should add teams. At our school, lots of kids show up for certain sports and then get cut. There are not freshman, JV, and varsity teams (just JV and varsity, and sometimes just varsity). Or OFFER a club sport for those who don't make the school teams. That at least lets the kids get a team feel with kids from their own school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do public schools still allow sports teams that have try outs / cut players? Why can’t everybody be on the team if they choose?
Um, for SO many reasons. Because then some kids will never get the chance to play. Because one or two coaches can only effectively coach/supervise a certain number of kids. Because a school bus for away games can only fit so many kids on it. Because isn't it enough the really sporty kids have to play with the really clumsy kids in gym class? Shouldn't they have the fun of getting to play with kids at a similar level? I could go on and on.
You are right of course. But I’d love to see really popular sports, where there are cuts, have B/C teams that practice and maybe don’t even have games. Just to allow those kids to play, enjoy the sport and maybe improve over the years.
This does exist. It's called club soccer. Or rec soccer.
Oh yeah! My kid plays at a higher level and is objectively a much better player (based on college recruiting) than kids on Varsity while he was on JV (and not even a JV starter)--while he played every minute and started on an area Club team that was top-ranked here and around the US. This HS is BIG on nepotism and politics. The level is nowhere near as high as Club, but it really means a lot to the kids that want to play for their school.
HS coaches can be weird.
HS Coaches are so weird. My son (Sophomore) plays in the top division at his club and made JV, yet some kids (Juniors) made the cut for Varsity and they play at his club in the 2nd and 3rd tier teams. Even a kid (also Junior) that plays Rec. only made Varsity.
Politics
Similar at our HS. And we have a ridiculous amount of 'multiples' --twins, triplets, etc. on all 3 teams that come as a package deal, even when they are not good at all.
Yes! this happens at our school too. One twin is good, the other gets a spot even though he is not as strong. We had two sets like that on the JV basketball team this winter: out of 12-14 kids, two were twin B's who didn't play but took up spots.
I have twins so this is not a slight on twins.
My son's HS soccer team had 3 sets of twins on JV. There are multiples on the Freshmen and Varsity too. One set of twins are god awful, but the older sibling on Varsity is a star. My kid is f$kd because they both play his position.
Wow. Where do you live that there are so many freaking twins? That's insane. 3 sets of twins on one JV team?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do public schools still allow sports teams that have try outs / cut players? Why can’t everybody be on the team if they choose?
Because you can't have a 50 person tennis team
Or a 40 roster varsity soccer team
Etc.
Why not? It is time to rewrite the so-called rules.
No, kids need ot learn and understand what being better than others means. Should we give everyone the job who submits a resume? Everyone gets to be on the debate team?
OMG.
You clearly do not have a clue about the true meaning of equity.
How sad for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do public schools still allow sports teams that have try outs / cut players? Why can’t everybody be on the team if they choose?
Um, for SO many reasons. Because then some kids will never get the chance to play. Because one or two coaches can only effectively coach/supervise a certain number of kids. Because a school bus for away games can only fit so many kids on it. Because isn't it enough the really sporty kids have to play with the really clumsy kids in gym class? Shouldn't they have the fun of getting to play with kids at a similar level? I could go on and on.
You are right of course. But I’d love to see really popular sports, where there are cuts, have B/C teams that practice and maybe don’t even have games. Just to allow those kids to play, enjoy the sport and maybe improve over the years.
This does exist. It's called club soccer. Or rec soccer.
In my area, rec ends at high school, and club is cost prohibitive for a lot of families. But I get that there are budget constraints.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do public schools still allow sports teams that have try outs / cut players? Why can’t everybody be on the team if they choose?
Um, for SO many reasons. Because then some kids will never get the chance to play. Because one or two coaches can only effectively coach/supervise a certain number of kids. Because a school bus for away games can only fit so many kids on it. Because isn't it enough the really sporty kids have to play with the really clumsy kids in gym class? Shouldn't they have the fun of getting to play with kids at a similar level? I could go on and on.
You are right of course. But I’d love to see really popular sports, where there are cuts, have B/C teams that practice and maybe don’t even have games. Just to allow those kids to play, enjoy the sport and maybe improve over the years.
This does exist. It's called club soccer. Or rec soccer.
Oh yeah! My kid plays at a higher level and is objectively a much better player (based on college recruiting) than kids on Varsity while he was on JV (and not even a JV starter)--while he played every minute and started on an area Club team that was top-ranked here and around the US. This HS is BIG on nepotism and politics. The level is nowhere near as high as Club, but it really means a lot to the kids that want to play for their school.
HS coaches can be weird.
HS Coaches are so weird. My son (Sophomore) plays in the top division at his club and made JV, yet some kids (Juniors) made the cut for Varsity and they play at his club in the 2nd and 3rd tier teams. Even a kid (also Junior) that plays Rec. only made Varsity.
Politics
Similar at our HS. And we have a ridiculous amount of 'multiples' --twins, triplets, etc. on all 3 teams that come as a package deal, even when they are not good at all.
Yes! this happens at our school too. One twin is good, the other gets a spot even though he is not as strong. We had two sets like that on the JV basketball team this winter: out of 12-14 kids, two were twin B's who didn't play but took up spots.
I have twins so this is not a slight on twins.
My son's HS soccer team had 3 sets of twins on JV. There are multiples on the Freshmen and Varsity too. One set of twins are god awful, but the older sibling on Varsity is a star. My kid is f$kd because they both play his position.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do public schools still allow sports teams that have try outs / cut players? Why can’t everybody be on the team if they choose?
Because you can't have a 50 person tennis team
Or a 40 roster varsity soccer team
Etc.
Why not? It is time to rewrite the so-called rules.
No, kids need ot learn and understand what being better than others means. Should we give everyone the job who submits a resume? Everyone gets to be on the debate team?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do public schools still allow sports teams that have try outs / cut players? Why can’t everybody be on the team if they choose?
Because you can't have a 50 person tennis team
Or a 40 roster varsity soccer team
Etc.
Why not? It is time to rewrite the so-called rules.
No, kids need ot learn and understand what being better than others means. Should we give everyone the job who submits a resume? Everyone gets to be on the debate team?
If the justification for sports is about it being part of a well rounded education then teams should be no cut. Otherwise, just let kids play club. FWIW, my kids play high school and club, but I think it's hypocritical when schools talk about the value of athletics and then cut the majority of kids who show up for tryouts
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do public schools still allow sports teams that have try outs / cut players? Why can’t everybody be on the team if they choose?
Because you can't have a 50 person tennis team
Or a 40 roster varsity soccer team
Etc.
Why not? It is time to rewrite the so-called rules.
No, kids need ot learn and understand what being better than others means. Should we give everyone the job who submits a resume? Everyone gets to be on the debate team?
Anonymous wrote:My son is on JV Soccer. His high school has a twitter page, facebook page and Instagram page for Boys Soccer.
However, only Varsity gets mentioned (practices, pictures,etc) like JV doesn't even exists.
What a joke!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do public schools still allow sports teams that have try outs / cut players? Why can’t everybody be on the team if they choose?
Because you can't have a 50 person tennis team
Or a 40 roster varsity soccer team
Etc.
Why not? It is time to rewrite the so-called rules.
Anonymous wrote:Our HS tennis team is a joke. They took 20 kids knowing only top 6 would play. The ones not in the top 6 sit around and just watch during practice. What is the point of that! Coach should have just chosen top 10-12. I also don't think tennis is taken seriously at our HS. Most players are pretty bad in general, even top 6.