Anonymous wrote:OP here.We read to him daily and a few times a week we read a Bob book or similar level together (trying to avoid reading at home becoming a chore).
He can work through some of the easier Bob books but many are too hard. Every word is a challenge even if he just decoded that word on the last page so he gets tired quickly and sight words still aren't clicking consistently.
To clarify, not blaming school or teacher-l (this year's or last year's) just trying to figure out how long to ride this out under be patient, everyone is catching up at different speeds vs panic- time to pull out all the stops.
Anonymous wrote:My daughter was slow to learn to read. She currently has a diagnosis of dyslexia and I pay for private OG therapy outside of school in addition to the support she gets in school through special education. She is in 4th grade.
HOWEVER, she showed a pattern of learning difficulties from as early as preschool. Couldn't identify all her letters going into Kindergarten, couldn't memorize sight words (she would look at the last letter and then just guess a word that started with that letter), couldn't rhyme, etc. Eventually, we noticed a distinct difference in her decoding vs encoding. She could LOOK at the word pig, for example, and say "pig." But if I asked her to spell the word, she had no idea. She'd say letters that had nothing to do with the word. This is when it became apparent (around 1st grade) that she was starting to survive by memorizing. We had her evaluated mid 2nd grade when the spelling didn't catch up to her perceived reading progress like the school kept telling me it would.
All this to say, if everything else seems okay and this is the first "red flag" you've seen, I'd be more inclined to say wait a bit. But if you've had any sort of nagging feeling that something's off for awhile now, I'd say go with your gut and start looking for more data from the school and possible evaluation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not an educator so l don’t feel qualified to reply to this.
As a parent who had a kid who was slow to read though, l really wish the US would dial it back. Seems like kids are expected to learn everything a year earlier than when l was a kid. Finland starts teaching kids to read at 7 and they have the best public education outcomes in the world.
Finnish is a much easier language to learn in terms of reading and writing. About a year or so if instruction is all you need. Not so with English.
Yes, was coming to say this. English has a much deeper orthography.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not an educator so l don’t feel qualified to reply to this.
As a parent who had a kid who was slow to read though, l really wish the US would dial it back. Seems like kids are expected to learn everything a year earlier than when l was a kid. Finland starts teaching kids to read at 7 and they have the best public education outcomes in the world.
Finnish is a much easier language to learn in terms of reading and writing. About a year or so if instruction is all you need. Not so with English.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He's being overlooked. The class is too big and the teacher is too preoccupied with a host of other things.
Kinderg was a dumpster fire for him last year, right? - 100% online? No 5 yr old can learn effectively that way not to mention grasp basic reading fundamentals (dies he even know what sound the letter "t" makes? Mine didn't).
So it's not uncommon for 1st graders to be seemingly behind. And not all parents are as vested at home with reading to their kids daily. So, take heart Op, you're on the right track, but that final link between letters/sounds/word (and reading comprehension, but focus on that later, get sight words under control) is always tough.
If your kid doesn't know the names and sounds of the letters, why are you complaining? That's pretty basic stuff. Teach that at home.
^^Isn't that what school is for ??^^^
Why is there a burden on "home" to teach? Sure, I'm fine with reading bedtime stories and helping with homework, but I'm not "teaching at home" like you are ordering me to do. I dont have a teaching degree so i lack the technique, resources, time, and effort. And I shouldn't have to "teach" my kid or pay extra for tutoring, or printout worksheets to supplement. FCPS should be doing that.
It's a common scenario for a lot of households.
Right, and FCPS is not doing it for a lot of kids. Bottom line, they don't care as much as you do about your own child. Teaching little kids to read doesn't require a lot of technique; patience, time, and a little insight into a kid's interests do the trick. There are loads of workbooks to make it less labor intensive. So it's your call whether you are willing to put in the extra time and effort (or $ if you choose to go the tutoring route).
Maybe in a different scenario, FCPS would be doing better but they just published data showing that 40% of the kids are significantly behind after the pandemic shutdown/virtual learning and are planning to introduce remedial learning as general education. That's going to force some parents who wouldn't otherwise do it to supplement, seek out tutors, or look into private schools.
Anonymous wrote:OP I don’t know what your budget is like, but it sounds like your kid might be close to getting overwhelmed and frustrated with your efforts. Maybe these posters are right and all it’s going to take is one of these books and more effort, but not if there’s an underlying issue like dyslexia. I personally would rule out that possibility before risking more needless frustration.
Anonymous wrote:Ask for an evaluation. This sounds like my daughter who wasn’t diagnosed with dyslexia until fifth grade. I believed all the excuses the teachers gave me and I am still pissed about it. FCPS fails kids in reading all.the.time
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He's being overlooked. The class is too big and the teacher is too preoccupied with a host of other things.
Kinderg was a dumpster fire for him last year, right? - 100% online? No 5 yr old can learn effectively that way not to mention grasp basic reading fundamentals (dies he even know what sound the letter "t" makes? Mine didn't).
So it's not uncommon for 1st graders to be seemingly behind. And not all parents are as vested at home with reading to their kids daily. So, take heart Op, you're on the right track, but that final link between letters/sounds/word (and reading comprehension, but focus on that later, get sight words under control) is always tough.
If your kid doesn't know the names and sounds of the letters, why are you complaining? That's pretty basic stuff. Teach that at home.
^^Isn't that what school is for ??^^^
Why is there a burden on "home" to teach? Sure, I'm fine with reading bedtime stories and helping with homework, but I'm not "teaching at home" like you are ordering me to do. I dont have a teaching degree so i lack the technique, resources, time, and effort. And I shouldn't have to "teach" my kid or pay extra for tutoring, or printout worksheets to supplement. FCPS should be doing that.
It's a common scenario for a lot of households.