Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh, FFS, OP.
Not one of the candidates said anything about "overturning" the decision. They did agree it was wrongly decided because of STATES RIGHTS. That is what this is all about.
The same as Roe v Wade. STATES RIGHTS.
And . . . wait for it . . . . they want to overturn it b/c it was wrongly decided.
Anonymous wrote:Oh, FFS, OP.
Not one of the candidates said anything about "overturning" the decision. They did agree it was wrongly decided because of STATES RIGHTS. That is what this is all about.
The same as Roe v Wade. STATES RIGHTS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh, FFS, OP.
Not one of the candidates said anything about "overturning" the decision. They did agree it was wrongly decided because of STATES RIGHTS. That is what this is all about.
The same as Roe v Wade. STATES RIGHTS.
This this this. Some of you should not post about legal issues because you lack all understanding.
So states can mandate vaccines and how your children are educated? Nothing in the constitution about that.
Anonymous wrote:Hard to imagine any state or government of any kind rolling back contraceptive use. This in inalienable personal bodily autonomy.
Anonymous wrote:Still no answer. And it’s a simple question. Should MI be able to outlaw contraception?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At this point, I hope the GOP MI state house tries to pass such a law. I hope the SCOTUS overturms Roe this summer.
Nothing will bring out the electorate like these two actions.
In order to overturn Roe completely, SCOTUS will have to rule the inferred right to privacy on government intrusion into personal matters does not exist. With that decision, Griswold v Connecticut and Lawrence v Texas will no longer stand.
Do I think states will ban birth control or gay sex? No, probably not, but they have to be willing to have these decisions tossed out with the bath water.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At this point, I hope the GOP MI state house tries to pass such a law. I hope the SCOTUS overturms Roe this summer.
Nothing will bring out the electorate like these two actions.
In order to overturn Roe completely, SCOTUS will have to rule the inferred right to privacy on government intrusion into personal matters does not exist. With that decision, Griswold v Connecticut and Lawrence v Texas will no longer stand.
Do I think states will ban birth control or gay sex? No, probably not, but they have to be willing to have these decisions tossed out with the bath water.
Anonymous wrote:At this point, I hope the GOP MI state house tries to pass such a law. I hope the SCOTUS overturms Roe this summer.
Nothing will bring out the electorate like these two actions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nice highly edited video. It would have been more helpful to hear *everything* they said - not just the selections that support a ridiculous narrative.
Post it then.
That's the point - the only version is the edited one. Why might that be? Hmm...