Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very disappointing. Too much time spent on a typical and uninteresting journalist and not enough time on this brilliant scam artist. I still don’t understand Anna. Typical and pat storytelling and dialogue. And it’s a story that should have been told linearly.
Too bad. This could have been riveting.
+1.
I was not interested in the reporter or her story at all. I found her exasperating and annoying, and the (many, many) scenes where she groaned and knelt and clutched her pregnant belly were cringe-worthy. I wanted to forward through all of the boring scenes about the reporter and her backstory or her relationships with her husband and coworkers.
The story would have been better without her character.
Me too. FF all reporter stuff and not a lot of insight into anna. Wasted opportunity. Hope someone does a remake which is good.
I disagree - I thought Vivian's character was essential here - it's a story within a story plot. You can't just leave it out. Also, I wonder if this is generational or based on what you typically watch. The actress playing Vivian is Anna Chlumsky - who is famous for My Girl and Veep. There is no one under 40 who doesn't immediately recognize her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very disappointing. Too much time spent on a typical and uninteresting journalist and not enough time on this brilliant scam artist. I still don’t understand Anna. Typical and pat storytelling and dialogue. And it’s a story that should have been told linearly.
Too bad. This could have been riveting.
+1.
I was not interested in the reporter or her story at all. I found her exasperating and annoying, and the (many, many) scenes where she groaned and knelt and clutched her pregnant belly were cringe-worthy. I wanted to forward through all of the boring scenes about the reporter and her backstory or her relationships with her husband and coworkers.
The story would have been better without her character.
Me too. FF all reporter stuff and not a lot of insight into anna. Wasted opportunity. Hope someone does a remake which is good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very disappointing. Too much time spent on a typical and uninteresting journalist and not enough time on this brilliant scam artist. I still don’t understand Anna. Typical and pat storytelling and dialogue. And it’s a story that should have been told linearly.
Too bad. This could have been riveting.
+1.
I was not interested in the reporter or her story at all. I found her exasperating and annoying, and the (many, many) scenes where she groaned and knelt and clutched her pregnant belly were cringe-worthy. I wanted to forward through all of the boring scenes about the reporter and her backstory or her relationships with her husband and coworkers.
The story would have been better without her character.
Me too. FF all reporter stuff and not a lot of insight into anna. Wasted opportunity. Hope someone does a remake which is good.
Anonymous wrote:Love it! But damn the accent is so bad and changes nonstop.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are we supposed to like Rachel? My wife and I both hate her after episode one. Zero redeeming qualities. Without any protagonist in the series it's hard to watch. Just a bunch of dislikable annoying people...
I think the show’s treatment of Rachel is funny because the real-life Rachel was so clearly opportunistic and so insufferably sanctimonious as she criticised Anna in various televised interviews.
Here’s just one clip of Rachel, talking about her two-month friendship with Anna, and Rachel’s utter shock and self-victimization. She does the same little-girl voice and eye-widening expressions that the actress playing her does on the show.
Anna Delvey MADE Rachel Williams as a writer. Rachel’s only story to tell is this one, and she’s profited hugely from it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Very disappointing. Too much time spent on a typical and uninteresting journalist and not enough time on this brilliant scam artist. I still don’t understand Anna. Typical and pat storytelling and dialogue. And it’s a story that should have been told linearly.
Too bad. This could have been riveting.
+1.
I was not interested in the reporter or her story at all. I found her exasperating and annoying, and the (many, many) scenes where she groaned and knelt and clutched her pregnant belly were cringe-worthy. I wanted to forward through all of the boring scenes about the reporter and her backstory or her relationships with her husband and coworkers.
The story would have been better without her character.
Anonymous wrote:Here’s an interview with the real Anna - I guess Julia’s accent was pretty much spot on since Anna’s accent sounds like a mash up of various things. Really weird.