Anonymous wrote:16, I felt like I already belonged to them but we didn’t actually put the whole thing together until we were around 23; together 26 years so far.
Anonymous wrote:23. My Jordan year.
Anonymous wrote:I am 64 and still have not met him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow to the other posts. This is DC, where it is a rite of passage for every woman to marry in her 30s and have kids in 30s and 40s. Maybe the pps are from out of the area?
As for me, I met my DH at 34 and was married at 35. He was 36/37. Married over 20 years.
I’m the PP who married at 25. Born and raised in the DMV. And no I’m not a SAHM. Went to a T14 and practice in Big Law.
Anonymous wrote:Wow to the other posts. This is DC, where it is a rite of passage for every woman to marry in her 30s and have kids in 30s and 40s. Maybe the pps are from out of the area?
As for me, I met my DH at 34 and was married at 35. He was 36/37. Married over 20 years.
Anonymous wrote:Met- me Just turned 26. He was 24.5.
Engaged 27.5/26.2
Married 28.5/27.2
Kids: 35/38; 34/36
Now: me 52 in 2 weeks; him 50.4.
Kids now 16 and 14.
I got knocked up first try with both. We purposely waited to start a family to just have fun/travel/party.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow to the other posts. This is DC, where it is a rite of passage for every woman to marry in her 30s and have kids in 30s and 40s. Maybe the pps are from out of the area?
As for me, I met my DH at 34 and was married at 35. He was 36/37. Married over 20 years.
I think it might be something of selection bias. If you meet very young, you are more likely to contribute than if you think I'm just like everyone else.
Anonymous wrote:Wow to the other posts. This is DC, where it is a rite of passage for every woman to marry in her 30s and have kids in 30s and 40s. Maybe the pps are from out of the area?
As for me, I met my DH at 34 and was married at 35. He was 36/37. Married over 20 years.