Anonymous wrote:Arranged marriages can work.
However, the process is tough if you have perceived negatIves such as: short, dark, fat, not well educated. Most families and match makers go with a like-for-like philosophy. If you're a short fat dark guy guess what your arranged marriage pool looks like?
The bright side is you're not left fending for yourself.
Anonymous wrote:My Indian-American neighbor’s daughter just got married to someone her parents found through an Indian matchmaker. She is good looking, has a good personality, really charming young woman, doing her medical residency. She dated several boys but didn’t really like anyone enough to go into a relationship. Her parents were getting anxious due to cultural norms of getting married before 30. They contacted some match makers and eventually found a good match. He is finishing up last year of medical school in NJ and has a residency slot secured here in Virginia. Their daughter met him few times in person and chatted over zoom and phone as well. They liked each other and agreed to marry.
It feels strange to me as they don’t really know each other but her parents are quite confident it has as much chance of working out as a love marriage. They didn’t even meet each other before wedding. Only saw pictures but it all worked out for them. I wonder if this traditional set up is still common and if it still works. All of my children’s Indian-American friends who were born and raised here in US are finding their partners in standard American ways and wouldn’t even consider any parental involvement, let alone matchmaking so this arrangement is not something we ever saw up close. I was wondering if this can be an option for non-Indians who aren’t finding love around them or on dating sites.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Marrying for love is a relatively new concept, and one that is not particularly successful.
Seriously? Marrying for love isn’t a new concept.
It’s only been in the last 150 or so years, so that is recent in context of human time
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Marrying for love is a relatively new concept, and one that is not particularly successful.
Seriously? Marrying for love isn’t a new concept.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:According to my Indian colleague, it’s not all as good as it seems on surface, match making and arranged marriages has its own pros and cons. He says not even educated Indians in India wants to go through it.
It’s not really arranged.
It’s like “here is a list of people that fit a certain criteria”. Who on this list do you vibe with.
🤦🏼♂️Here is a list of people from certain race, religion, nationality, ethnicity, cast, social class, profession, income, educational level etc., your parents approve of, please pick any flavor of vanilla you prefer.💆🏽
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1. She probably isn’t as pretty as you claim she is
2. She and/or her parents wouldn’t consider someone who is a non-doctor (or equivalent ses level of a doc)
Those are the reasons why the non-arranged market didn’t work for her.
When markets don’t clear, interventions need to happen in order to find a solution.
Once you start viewing mating in market terms, everything makes sense
Probably #1. Pretty and lucrative profession Indian girls are mostly out of the market by college.
Those days are gone. My kids attended a high school an a heavily Indian suburban school district, had many in NJ colleges and grad/medical schools, have Indian work colleagues as well so friends with lots of Indians(immigrants, international students, expats, visa hires) and American born Indians. Not many American born Indian girls getting married before 30’s and it’s not because they aren’t pretty or successful, it’s because they are picky and ambitious and in no rush to get married.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Eh, arranged doesn’t mean forced, ya know. I think going into marriage with a high level of commitment and low expectations for what *you’re* going to get out of it is always a good idea. Many choices can lead to a lot of entitlement.
Plus how many couples do you know who are utterly shocked at who their partners are ten years into marriage? Marriage is always like a box of chocolates imo.
But it is very foreign (literally and figuratively) to me, a white American, too.
Most Indians are also considered white.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Marrying for love is a relatively new concept, and one that is not particularly successful.
Seriously? Marrying for love isn’t a new concept.
What’s Taj Mahal stands for?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it more about finding right religion, cast, ethnicity, social status, looks, income etc or the person? It’s fine if there is no rush to get engaged or marry immediately. If you date for a year and then decide, it may work better but most parents are against it because then things tend to go sour.
Two adults who have gone through all the work to make it to medical school and have a good work ethic, probably have good examples of functional families in their own lives, are educated and high SES, have vetted each other after dating others, decide to marry with the blessings of two families and are being judged by a group of dysfunctional people whose national divorce rate is 50%?
ok. sure.
Fair point, but the colorism and misogyny embedded in the process is absolutely ripe for in-culture and out-culture critique.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Could work. Especially if they both expect that the marriage won't fulfill every single need they have for social/emotional/intellectual fulfillment, but they both expect they will be reasonable, caring people who work together to make a home and family.
The One True Love narrative is a lot of pressure.
+100
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Marrying for love is a relatively new concept, and one that is not particularly successful.
Seriously? Marrying for love isn’t a new concept.