Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, why do we care? It's not like the Ukraine is a major economic force. They don't have oil or a large manufacturing base. I'm not sure why it would be in the US's interest to get involved.
I could probably make a good argument for NATO and/or UN involvment, but I'm not sure why the US would want to get involved on its own. Feel free to convince me otherwise.
Holy crap, open a history book. The USSR committed genocide in the Ukraine and tried to purposefully starve to death the Ukrainians under Stalin. Nearly 4 million Ukrainians were killed by the soviets during Holomodor. There's even a damn Holomodor memorial in DC to remember the genocide! Yet we are just supposed to forget history and allow Putin to recapitulate the days of Ukraine under Stalin?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The whole world "senses weakness." How is anyone speaking to POTUS supposed to know if POTUS even knows what his own policy is?
We are talking about Ukraine here, supposedly Biden's area of expertise from his time as VP and a major ongoing crisis. How is it that he can't even answer questions from the press without Psaki scribbling out corrections as she watches the press conference?
We had an attenpted coup and not only have we done notbing about that we also have over 40% of the population and 99% of Republican officials that support it. Of course the world sense weakness in the US.
Anonymous wrote:
The whole world "senses weakness." How is anyone speaking to POTUS supposed to know if POTUS even knows what his own policy is?
We are talking about Ukraine here, supposedly Biden's area of expertise from his time as VP and a major ongoing crisis. How is it that he can't even answer questions from the press without Psaki scribbling out corrections as she watches the press conference?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, why do we care? It's not like the Ukraine is a major economic force. They don't have oil or a large manufacturing base. I'm not sure why it would be in the US's interest to get involved.
I could probably make a good argument for NATO and/or UN involvment, but I'm not sure why the US would want to get involved on its own. Feel free to convince me otherwise.
Holy crap, open a history book. The USSR committed genocide in the Ukraine and tried to purposefully starve to death the Ukrainians under Stalin. Nearly 4 million Ukrainians were killed by the soviets during Holomodor. There's even a damn Holomodor memorial in DC to remember the genocide! Yet we are just supposed to forget history and allow Putin to recapitulate the days of Ukraine under Stalin?
This is true. It is also true that a huge number of Ukrainians volunteered in German squads and killed a huge number of Jews. It is also true that parts of Ukraine were in the Austro-Hungarian Empire, it is true that they are haters of Jews for centuries. It is also true that Ukraine has almost never been a separate country but a part of the Russian Empire. It is also true that Crimea was not a part of Ukraine until one USSR president gave it to them in 1954.
You can find all kinds of wrongs in the world if you look hard enough. You will find that the new population of the U.S. committed genocide of the Native population, engaged in slavery, and kills black people by choking them in public.
I am not sure what you think to provoke with your post? Pity, the need to right the wrong? To pain one ethnic group as evil but the other as good? Should we not look at ourselves before we accuse others of being evil?
Ahhh....whataboutisms. A classic and favorite tactic of communists since 1951!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, why do we care? It's not like the Ukraine is a major economic force. They don't have oil or a large manufacturing base. I'm not sure why it would be in the US's interest to get involved.
I could probably make a good argument for NATO and/or UN involvment, but I'm not sure why the US would want to get involved on its own. Feel free to convince me otherwise.
Holy crap, open a history book. The USSR committed genocide in the Ukraine and tried to purposefully starve to death the Ukrainians under Stalin. Nearly 4 million Ukrainians were killed by the soviets during Holomodor. There's even a damn Holomodor memorial in DC to remember the genocide! Yet we are just supposed to forget history and allow Putin to recapitulate the days of Ukraine under Stalin?
This is true. It is also true that a huge number of Ukrainians volunteered in German squads and killed a huge number of Jews. It is also true that parts of Ukraine were in the Austro-Hungarian Empire, it is true that they are haters of Jews for centuries. It is also true that Ukraine has almost never been a separate country but a part of the Russian Empire. It is also true that Crimea was not a part of Ukraine until one USSR president gave it to them in 1954.
You can find all kinds of wrongs in the world if you look hard enough. You will find that the new population of the U.S. committed genocide of the Native population, engaged in slavery, and kills black people by choking them in public.
I am not sure what you think to provoke with your post? Pity, the need to right the wrong? To pain one ethnic group as evil but the other as good? Should we not look at ourselves before we accuse others of being evil?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, why do we care? It's not like the Ukraine is a major economic force. They don't have oil or a large manufacturing base. I'm not sure why it would be in the US's interest to get involved.
I could probably make a good argument for NATO and/or UN involvment, but I'm not sure why the US would want to get involved on its own. Feel free to convince me otherwise.
Holy crap, open a history book. The USSR committed genocide in the Ukraine and tried to purposefully starve to death the Ukrainians under Stalin. Nearly 4 million Ukrainians were killed by the soviets during Holomodor. There's even a damn Holomodor memorial in DC to remember the genocide! Yet we are just supposed to forget history and allow Putin to recapitulate the days of Ukraine under Stalin?
Anonymous wrote:Sure there is, it's called the Salvador Option. We pick a side in Ukraine, flood those rebels with a guaranteed stream of weapons and training, and let them loose on Russian soldiers and their pro-Russian proxies in Ukraine. These rebels will commit horrific war crimes against Russia over years, while Americans forget and turns their attention to some other topic that's the flavor of the week.
Anonymous wrote:Honestly, why do we care? It's not like the Ukraine is a major economic force. They don't have oil or a large manufacturing base. I'm not sure why it would be in the US's interest to get involved.
I could probably make a good argument for NATO and/or UN involvment, but I'm not sure why the US would want to get involved on its own. Feel free to convince me otherwise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s odd to me that if Trump was Putin’s Puppet, as we’re constantly told, then why does Putin only seem to invade other countries when Dems are president? First time with Obama, and now this time with Biden. When Trump was in office, Putin didn’t invade anything.
Can someone explain that to me?
Why does that seem odd? It makes complete sense. Trump was not a threat.
That makes ZERO sense. None.
If Trump was no threat, Putin should’ve been running rampant through Ukraine and possibly other places, knowing that he’d be unchallenged in doing so since “he had his puppet in the whitehouse”.
That’s what you do if you’re a Putin. You make your moves when you know you won’t be challenged. Because that’s the path of least resistance. Waiting - as you suggest - until you have a perceived threat in your opposition would be stupid. Wouldn’t you rather time your invasion for when you won’t experience any pushback?
Your answer is cognitively implausible. Putin is a lot of things, but stupid isn’t one of them. He, like all bullies, will always choose a time of vulnerability to strike. It is completely absurd to imagine that he’d wait until the times when his chief adversary is stronger to make a move.
So again, explain it to me.