Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People are so effing crazy, as evidenced by this thread.
As others have said, if the surrogate is willing and not coerced and you compensate well then of course this is ethical. People die doing construction work all the time but no one questions the ethics of hiring a crew to build you something.
If everyone involved has free will and is being treated well, then all the consenting adults are making their own choices and everything is, IMO, fully ethical.
Then why can't you buy organs from people? It's actually less risky to have part of your liver removed or a kidney fully removed than pregnancy and childbirth. Answer: it's exploitation of the bodies of other humans. We can't use the poor for organ farms and we shouldn't use them as womb rentals.
And paying a lot does not equal making things ethically OK. I have a bunch of money so I want to shoot endangered animals. Is that morally OK if I pay the animals' owners well?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Another woman’s body is for sale.
Celebrate??
If you’re opposed to the fact that this is essentially a woman selling her body, do you hold the same opposition when a gay couple uses a surrogate?
Anonymous wrote:People are so effing crazy, as evidenced by this thread.
As others have said, if the surrogate is willing and not coerced and you compensate well then of course this is ethical. People die doing construction work all the time but no one questions the ethics of hiring a crew to build you something.
If everyone involved has free will and is being treated well, then all the consenting adults are making their own choices and everything is, IMO, fully ethical.
Anonymous wrote:
Another woman’s body is for sale.
Celebrate??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Babies start to bond with their mothers in the womb. So no.
You don’t support adoption?
NP here, and an adoptive parent.
I support adoption as a solution to a problem, which is children who don't have the option of staying with their families (in my child's case his parents died). I think it can be a wonderful solution in tragic circumstances, and adoptive families can help kids overcome some of the challenges that come from the original tragedy.
But that doesn't mean I think it should be a first choice for any child.
So. It’s still true your child bonded with their mother in the womb.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you don’t have any medical reason to do so. I just don’t want to be pregnant again, gain weight and have to try to lose it again. have my body change permanently, give birth etc.
And I can easily afford a surrogate.
Would you do it in my situation?
It is immoral and you are amoral. If I were your husband, I would divorce you and get 100% custody of children and never allow you to see them again
Anonymous wrote:If you pay a good wage for all the pregnancy hours.
$20/hr for every hour pregnant is ~ $130K.
Plus a bonus for child birth and more if they pump.
If you pay -$200K I’m cool with it.
Anonymous wrote:I don't know. I'm not an ethicist but the OP's question did give me pause. I listen to this podcast called Rough Translation by NPR. One episode was about an international surrogacy. They profiled a surrogate from the US who gave birth for parents from China. They did another podcast with an update a year or two later. I'm sure I'm not getting all of the details exactly correct but there was something about the birth father's DNA that did something to the surrogate's body that caused problems during the pregnancy but also longer-lasting impacts on the surrogate's health. It made me think compensation should be more expansive and brought all of these questions to my mind about the ethics of it all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Babies start to bond with their mothers in the womb. So no.
You don’t support adoption?
NP here, and an adoptive parent.
I support adoption as a solution to a problem, which is children who don't have the option of staying with their families (in my child's case his parents died). I think it can be a wonderful solution in tragic circumstances, and adoptive families can help kids overcome some of the challenges that come from the original tragedy.
But that doesn't mean I think it should be a first choice for any child.
Anonymous wrote:I don't know. I'm not an ethicist but the OP's question did give me pause. I listen to this podcast called Rough Translation by NPR. One episode was about an international surrogacy. They profiled a surrogate from the US who gave birth for parents from China. They did another podcast with an update a year or two later. I'm sure I'm not getting all of the details exactly correct but there was something about the birth father's DNA that did something to the surrogate's body that caused problems during the pregnancy but also longer-lasting impacts on the surrogate's health. It made me think compensation should be more expansive and brought all of these questions to my mind about the ethics of it all.
Anonymous wrote:If you don’t have any medical reason to do so. I just don’t want to be pregnant again, gain weight and have to try to lose it again. have my body change permanently, give birth etc.
And I can easily afford a surrogate.
Would you do it in my situation?