Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can go to court and fight for full custody but that would be pretty terrible for him and the kids. Or, just leave the kids with him and take the job. You can have visits on holidays and summers.
Sounds like I have to persuade him to let me go…
You mean and take the kids with you?
I mean, speaking as a father, my answer to you would be I support you going and will work with you to give you as much opportunity to see the children as possible, but I would go to the mat in court to prevent you from taking my kids with you. Your choices are to not take the job and remain close to the kids or take the jobs and see the kids sometimes. Those are quite literally the only two choices. The other one where you take your children with you? It's not happening. And that IS a hill I would die on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can go to court and fight for full custody but that would be pretty terrible for him and the kids. Or, just leave the kids with him and take the job. You can have visits on holidays and summers.
Sounds like I have to persuade him to let me go…
You mean and take the kids with you?
I mean, speaking as a father, my answer to you would be I support you going and will work with you to give you as much opportunity to see the children as possible, but I would go to the mat in court to prevent you from taking my kids with you. Your choices are to not take the job and remain close to the kids or take the jobs and see the kids sometimes. Those are quite literally the only two choices. The other one where you take your children with you? It's not happening. And that IS a hill I would die on.
Lousy dad. All about you.
You are a c*nt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can go to court and fight for full custody but that would be pretty terrible for him and the kids. Or, just leave the kids with him and take the job. You can have visits on holidays and summers.
Sounds like I have to persuade him to let me go…
You mean and take the kids with you?
I mean, speaking as a father, my answer to you would be I support you going and will work with you to give you as much opportunity to see the children as possible, but I would go to the mat in court to prevent you from taking my kids with you. Your choices are to not take the job and remain close to the kids or take the jobs and see the kids sometimes. Those are quite literally the only two choices. The other one where you take your children with you? It's not happening. And that IS a hill I would die on.
Anonymous wrote:OP, how is he an “absentee Dad” if he has the kids 50% of the time?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can go to court and fight for full custody but that would be pretty terrible for him and the kids. Or, just leave the kids with him and take the job. You can have visits on holidays and summers.
Sounds like I have to persuade him to let me go…
You mean and take the kids with you?
I mean, speaking as a father, my answer to you would be I support you going and will work with you to give you as much opportunity to see the children as possible, but I would go to the mat in court to prevent you from taking my kids with you. Your choices are to not take the job and remain close to the kids or take the jobs and see the kids sometimes. Those are quite literally the only two choices. The other one where you take your children with you? It's not happening. And that IS a hill I would die on.
Lousy dad. All about you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You could take the job, but presumably you'd need to leave the kids behind.
I can't imagine doing that as a parent, but other people feel differently.
Oh no - I’m not leaving them behind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can go to court and fight for full custody but that would be pretty terrible for him and the kids. Or, just leave the kids with him and take the job. You can have visits on holidays and summers.
Sounds like I have to persuade him to let me go…
You mean and take the kids with you?
I mean, speaking as a father, my answer to you would be I support you going and will work with you to give you as much opportunity to see the children as possible, but I would go to the mat in court to prevent you from taking my kids with you. Your choices are to not take the job and remain close to the kids or take the jobs and see the kids sometimes. Those are quite literally the only two choices. The other one where you take your children with you? It's not happening. And that IS a hill I would die on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can go to court and fight for full custody but that would be pretty terrible for him and the kids. Or, just leave the kids with him and take the job. You can have visits on holidays and summers.
Sounds like I have to persuade him to let me go…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Grateful if someone has an answer to the following.
Suppose I’m divorced with 50% custody of children.
Does that mean I’m forever tied to the location job-wise where my husband is also located?
That is, I can’t accept overseas job offers as that would effectively prevent his 50% custody?
You can take a job overseas becuase you would be giving up your 50% custody. Why would HE lose his custody if YOU leave?
Be cause they talk, discuss and mediate what to do z
Just like any normal couple discusses job change or relocation.
Custody isn’t a picnic or status symbol. It is hard work, time, energy and sacrifice raising children well and their needs cared for. If you broke your marital relationship not caring for a spouse well nor your kids well they drop the status and image and let your children live where all their needs are well taken care of.
If someone isn’t willing to do this while married, I don’t see why they would be willing to do it when divorced.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Grateful if someone has an answer to the following.
Suppose I’m divorced with 50% custody of children.
Does that mean I’m forever tied to the location job-wise where my husband is also located?
That is, I can’t accept overseas job offers as that would effectively prevent his 50% custody?
You can take a job overseas becuase you would be giving up your 50% custody. Why would HE lose his custody if YOU leave?
Be cause they talk, discuss and mediate what to do z
Just like any normal couple discusses job change or relocation.
Custody isn’t a picnic or status symbol. It is hard work, time, energy and sacrifice raising children well and their needs cared for. If you broke your marital relationship not caring for a spouse well nor your kids well they drop the status and image and let your children live where all their needs are well taken care of.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Grateful if someone has an answer to the following.
Suppose I’m divorced with 50% custody of children.
Does that mean I’m forever tied to the location job-wise where my husband is also located?
That is, I can’t accept overseas job offers as that would effectively prevent his 50% custody?
You can take a job overseas becuase you would be giving up your 50% custody. Why would HE lose his custody if YOU leave?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Grateful if someone has an answer to the following.
Suppose I’m divorced with 50% custody of children.
Does that mean I’m forever tied to the location job-wise where my husband is also located?
That is, I can’t accept overseas job offers as that would effectively prevent his 50% custody?
You can take a job overseas becuase you would be giving up your 50% custody. Why would HE lose his custody if YOU leave?
Anonymous wrote:Grateful if someone has an answer to the following.
Suppose I’m divorced with 50% custody of children.
Does that mean I’m forever tied to the location job-wise where my husband is also located?
That is, I can’t accept overseas job offers as that would effectively prevent his 50% custody?