Anonymous wrote:"To be blunt OP, it doesn’t make sense to you because you are living in a different universe than they are. I don’t mean that in an insulting way."
OP here. Thank you. I get what you're saying. The parents I know who are supportive of their kids doing these programs are mainly those who didn't graduate from 4-yr schools or who came here as adults from other countries. They're all in upper middle class school districts where most kids are college bound and feel they're giving their kids the best shot at life. I feel like they're being misled into thinking this is going to put their kid on the fast track to college, as in they think it will help their child get admitted to the flagship state school. These are kids who might have been accepted to that flagship had they stayed on campus and taken the fourth year of French, math, or history, etc... that the more competitive schools want to see on the transcript.
Anonymous wrote:Dual enrollment was invented to prop up community colleges as their enrollment numbers have been suffering for the past decade. It also fills in the gap from our lagging k-12 system. Community college is simply what 11th and 12th grade was a decade or two ago.
If your student attends a rigorous k-12, dual enrollment is not attractive or necessary.
Anonymous wrote:Dual enrollment was invented to prop up community colleges as their enrollment numbers have been suffering for the past decade. It also fills in the gap from our lagging k-12 system. Community college is simply what 11th and 12th grade was a decade or two ago.
If your student attends a rigorous k-12, dual enrollment is not attractive or necessary.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dual enrollment was invented to prop up community colleges as their enrollment numbers have been suffering for the past decade. It also fills in the gap from our lagging k-12 system. Community college is simply what 11th and 12th grade was a decade or two ago.
If your student attends a rigorous k-12, dual enrollment is not attractive or necessary.
Source?
100% false. I taught several classes at NVCC, the earliest of which was in the mid 90s. There were a few dual enrolled kids in my classes back then.
Anonymous wrote:Dual enrollment was invented to prop up community colleges as their enrollment numbers have been suffering for the past decade. It also fills in the gap from our lagging k-12 system. Community college is simply what 11th and 12th grade was a decade or two ago.
If your student attends a rigorous k-12, dual enrollment is not attractive or necessary.
Anonymous wrote:
I've never understood it myself. My kid takes a lot of APs. Why does he need a subpar community college course? He's aiming for a selective college. If he doesn't get in anyway, he'd rather spend his time in high school rather than shuttling back and forth to a community college.
Depends on your situation. I know of some low income kids that got two year degree in high school and then two years at a university and graduated at 20 with next to no debt. Not stupid, however much some schools and some parents may pretend otherwise.
Name the school and source for your assertion or it’s not credible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"To be blunt OP, it doesn’t make sense to you because you are living in a different universe than they are. I don’t mean that in an insulting way."
OP here. Thank you. I get what you're saying. The parents I know who are supportive of their kids doing these programs are mainly those who didn't graduate from 4-yr schools or who came here as adults from other countries. They're all in upper middle class school districts where most kids are college bound and feel they're giving their kids the best shot at life. I feel like they're being misled into thinking this is going to put their kid on the fast track to college, as in they think it will help their child get admitted to the flagship state school. These are kids who might have been accepted to that flagship had they stayed on campus and taken the fourth year of French, math, or history, etc... that the more competitive schools want to see on the transcript.
To graduate, all kids need four years of math and history (science and English), so I still don’t get your point. Some dual enrolled kids will take a fourth year of a language and some won’t. Some non dual enrolled kids will take a fourth year of a language and some won’t. Neither is right or wrong and neither is doing a disservice to their kids.
How many parents of kids taking dual enrolled classes do you know, where you also know the parents’ college education track OR their age at their immigration to America?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll take a gander - because you are succeeding in a college course. Most of College is really an executive function test and I would think if you show maturity in high school this would reflect well upon your college career. Also there is a financial incentive. If you go to MoCo community college, for instance, UMD HAS to accept your c.c. Credits - so you are ‘ahead’ of the game and can graduate a little earlier. UMD College Park is Harvard for most middle class kids...
What I don’t get is why most kids just don’t sit the GED in 10th grade (if they want to graduate early) and just enter Community College in the junior year of high school. That makes more sense than getting one credit free a semester while in high school.
I don't know how it works in different MD counties, but where we live, dual enrollment isn't free and each class is 3 credits, so I don't know what you mean by getting one free credit a semester.
B/c if the four year university the kids ends up transferring to ends up accepting the credits, they aren’t paying for - as an example- a year of that school. I think that’s the point the person above was trying to make.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"To be blunt OP, it doesn’t make sense to you because you are living in a different universe than they are. I don’t mean that in an insulting way."
OP here. Thank you. I get what you're saying. The parents I know who are supportive of their kids doing these programs are mainly those who didn't graduate from 4-yr schools or who came here as adults from other countries. They're all in upper middle class school districts where most kids are college bound and feel they're giving their kids the best shot at life. I feel like they're being misled into thinking this is going to put their kid on the fast track to college, as in they think it will help their child get admitted to the flagship state school. These are kids who might have been accepted to that flagship had they stayed on campus and taken the fourth year of French, math, or history, etc... that the more competitive schools want to see on the transcript.
To graduate, all kids need four years of math and history (science and English), so I still don’t get your point. Some dual enrolled kids will take a fourth year of a language and some won’t. Some non dual enrolled kids will take a fourth year of a language and some won’t. Neither is right or wrong and neither is doing a disservice to their kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll take a gander - because you are succeeding in a college course. Most of College is really an executive function test and I would think if you show maturity in high school this would reflect well upon your college career. Also there is a financial incentive. If you go to MoCo community college, for instance, UMD HAS to accept your c.c. Credits - so you are ‘ahead’ of the game and can graduate a little earlier. UMD College Park is Harvard for most middle class kids...
What I don’t get is why most kids just don’t sit the GED in 10th grade (if they want to graduate early) and just enter Community College in the junior year of high school. That makes more sense than getting one credit free a semester while in high school.
I don't know how it works in different MD counties, but where we live, dual enrollment isn't free and each class is 3 credits, so I don't know what you mean by getting one free credit a semester.
Anonymous wrote:
I've never understood it myself. My kid takes a lot of APs. Why does he need a subpar community college course? He's aiming for a selective college. If he doesn't get in anyway, he'd rather spend his time in high school rather than shuttling back and forth to a community college.