Anonymous wrote:k-8 parent here with child at Big 3. Our experience at k-8 was great and our child did not find application process to be toxic. Our goal was NEVER Big 3 but best fit and we encouraged our child to do the same. We have another still at k-8 and they may or may not go to a Big 3.
Our child's cohort was very strong and over 30% of the class landed at STA/NCS, Sidwell, GDS. If you include Potomac/Holton/Maret it was 40%.
I agree with previous posters that it's typical that the top 20-25% of class will go to top schools but I will also say that these kids are high fliers (and that many parents think their kid is in the high flier category but the kid is not). That said - nothing is a guarantee; it also happens that (a) some kids get in that are not as academically strong (usually they have some special pull - whether known publicly or not) and (b) sometimes someone strong gets shut out for reasons unknown.
Bottom line is that, if your goal is Big 3 for HS, then try as early and as often as you can to apply there. A K-8 is not the place for you if you want this guarantee.
We'd never trade the k-8 experience but Big3 is not the priority.
In our kids' experience, the HS application process was not stressful at all, and they barely talked about it with their friends at school, it was not competitive. Our kids ended up at a "Big 3" which is what they wanted. It all worked out, but as parents you have to be prepared that you're not fully in control of the process or your 14 year-old child. I agree that perhaps a K-8 is not a good fit for insecure, status-seeking parents who are obsessed with fake notions of prestige or elitism.
Anonymous wrote:My kids attended an upper NW DCPS elementary. Quite a few of the kids who couldn't hack it at our elementary and/or at Deal transferred into one K-8 or another along the way.
There are many smart kids at the K-8s (for sure), but they are also used by families as a softer alternative for kids who are struggling academically in public.
In contrast, the strongest public school kids all stayed in public through middle school.
Anyway, what I'm saying is that 20% heading on to the "Big3" from a K-8 is probably about right. The top 20% are probably appropriate for the elite, pressure cooker high schools. The K-8
schools have kids all over the academic spectrum, not unlike public schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, the K-8 threads seem to trigger defensivensss and nastiness. Not sure why.
It seems like the defensiveness on these threads is mostly on the part of the K-12 boosters who can’t abide the fact that other parents might not share their view that a school that goes through high school is the most desirable type of school for young kids. And then the K-8 boosters get pissed off in response.
Anonymous wrote:Yes that was the point and no I’m not that person, but it was the perfect asinine response to such an asinine statement like calling children used goods.Anonymous wrote:Used goods? What are you prattling on about?[/quote]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Taught for 10 years at one of those K-8 schools and it really depends on the kid as much as the school. HS placement is much more competitive in recent years but it should be about getting your child placed in a school that is their best fit, not the most elite, etc. I’m married to a HS private school teacher and you wouldn’t believe the amount of grade inflation and edited letters of recommendation that come out of these K-8’s! I agree it would be more realistic to transfer from another k-12 or 3-12 school where there business model isn’t selling used goods. K-8 schools are
Not reform schools despite many parents treating them that way!!!
Oh come on...
Also, you're supposedly a teacher and can't be bothered to spell "their" correctly?
Wow, you and your archaic phrase have been long gone form DCUM. what brought you back?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are not sure what will be best for HS, that is why we are looking at k-8. Thinking our child will have a say once looking at HS. Is there a thought if which K-8 prepares the kids best for whatever HS they choose??
YAY! This is a great reason to look at k-8. We love that our children had a say once looking at HS. It also helped them have a sense of ownership once they were in high school, since it was a school that they had considered and chosen. Relatedly, it also made the college process easier, since they had already gone through the process of applying to high school. Our children told us that they thought the college application process was much smoother and less stressful for them than it was for their K-12 lifer friends.
Yes that was what the Sheridan boosters said but I don’t actually think that’s a positive. You should only have the experience of applying to college once, and don’t need a dry run for high school. I also got the sense that the HS application process took over the 8th grade year and made things competitive among the kids.
This response is a perfect example of why the discussions about K-8s become toxic. A parent is sharing an experience and observation that their own children shared with them as a positive, and then a commenter responds defensively "I don't actually think that's a positive."![]()
That’s not toxic, just their opinion. And having actually just been through the experience with my kid I agree it’s a waste of 8th grade.
This is an anonymous message board not a real life conversation. That you think someone with a contrary opinion or experience is “toxic” is exactly the defensiveness we are talking about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are not sure what will be best for HS, that is why we are looking at k-8. Thinking our child will have a say once looking at HS. Is there a thought if which K-8 prepares the kids best for whatever HS they choose??
YAY! This is a great reason to look at k-8. We love that our children had a say once looking at HS. It also helped them have a sense of ownership once they were in high school, since it was a school that they had considered and chosen. Relatedly, it also made the college process easier, since they had already gone through the process of applying to high school. Our children told us that they thought the college application process was much smoother and less stressful for them than it was for their K-12 lifer friends.
Yes that was what the Sheridan boosters said but I don’t actually think that’s a positive. You should only have the experience of applying to college once, and don’t need a dry run for high school. I also got the sense that the HS application process took over the 8th grade year and made things competitive among the kids.
This response is a perfect example of why the discussions about K-8s become toxic. A parent is sharing an experience and observation that their own children shared with them as a positive, and then a commenter responds defensively "I don't actually think that's a positive."![]()
That’s not toxic, just their opinion. And having actually just been through the experience with my kid I agree it’s a waste of 8th grade.
This is an anonymous message board not a real life conversation. That you think someone with a contrary opinion or experience is “toxic” is exactly the defensiveness we are talking about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are not sure what will be best for HS, that is why we are looking at k-8. Thinking our child will have a say once looking at HS. Is there a thought if which K-8 prepares the kids best for whatever HS they choose??
YAY! This is a great reason to look at k-8. We love that our children had a say once looking at HS. It also helped them have a sense of ownership once they were in high school, since it was a school that they had considered and chosen. Relatedly, it also made the college process easier, since they had already gone through the process of applying to high school. Our children told us that they thought the college application process was much smoother and less stressful for them than it was for their K-12 lifer friends.
Yes that was what the Sheridan boosters said but I don’t actually think that’s a positive. You should only have the experience of applying to college once, and don’t need a dry run for high school. I also got the sense that the HS application process took over the 8th grade year and made things competitive among the kids.
This response is a perfect example of why the discussions about K-8s become toxic. A parent is sharing an experience and observation that their own children shared with them as a positive, and then a commenter responds defensively "I don't actually think that's a positive."![]()
That’s not toxic, just their opinion. And having actually just been through the experience with my kid I agree it’s a waste of 8th grade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are not sure what will be best for HS, that is why we are looking at k-8. Thinking our child will have a say once looking at HS. Is there a thought if which K-8 prepares the kids best for whatever HS they choose??
YAY! This is a great reason to look at k-8. We love that our children had a say once looking at HS. It also helped them have a sense of ownership once they were in high school, since it was a school that they had considered and chosen. Relatedly, it also made the college process easier, since they had already gone through the process of applying to high school. Our children told us that they thought the college application process was much smoother and less stressful for them than it was for their K-12 lifer friends.
Yes that was what the Sheridan boosters said but I don’t actually think that’s a positive. You should only have the experience of applying to college once, and don’t need a dry run for high school. I also got the sense that the HS application process took over the 8th grade year and made things competitive among the kids.
This response is a perfect example of why the discussions about K-8s become toxic. A parent is sharing an experience and observation that their own children shared with them as a positive, and then a commenter responds defensively "I don't actually think that's a positive."![]()
That’s not toxic, just their opinion. And having actually just been through the experience with my kid I agree it’s a waste of 8th grade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP stipulated that they like the K-8 model.
Many of the responses are people telling OP that they shouldn’t like the K-8 model. So it’s just a lot of irrelevant noise.
OP, we loved the K-8 model also. I can’t speak to the other schools, but Norwood was great for our kids from the standpoint of preparation as well as high school placement. It gave our kids the precise type of experience we were hoping for in the first place with a K-8. We really loved it, never regretted sending our kids there and never considered moving them early. Good luck to you!
+1
We love the k-8 model. We have a lot of faith that if our kids do well at their k-8 they will get into a competitive HS. And if our kids don’t do well, then a very academic high school is probably not the best place for them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are not sure what will be best for HS, that is why we are looking at k-8. Thinking our child will have a say once looking at HS. Is there a thought if which K-8 prepares the kids best for whatever HS they choose??
YAY! This is a great reason to look at k-8. We love that our children had a say once looking at HS. It also helped them have a sense of ownership once they were in high school, since it was a school that they had considered and chosen. Relatedly, it also made the college process easier, since they had already gone through the process of applying to high school. Our children told us that they thought the college application process was much smoother and less stressful for them than it was for their K-12 lifer friends.
Yes that was what the Sheridan boosters said but I don’t actually think that’s a positive. You should only have the experience of applying to college once, and don’t need a dry run for high school. I also got the sense that the HS application process took over the 8th grade year and made things competitive among the kids.
This response is a perfect example of why the discussions about K-8s become toxic. A parent is sharing an experience and observation that their own children shared with them as a positive, and then a commenter responds defensively "I don't actually think that's a positive."![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are not sure what will be best for HS, that is why we are looking at k-8. Thinking our child will have a say once looking at HS. Is there a thought if which K-8 prepares the kids best for whatever HS they choose??
YAY! This is a great reason to look at k-8. We love that our children had a say once looking at HS. It also helped them have a sense of ownership once they were in high school, since it was a school that they had considered and chosen. Relatedly, it also made the college process easier, since they had already gone through the process of applying to high school. Our children told us that they thought the college application process was much smoother and less stressful for them than it was for their K-12 lifer friends.
Yes that was what the Sheridan boosters said but I don’t actually think that’s a positive. You should only have the experience of applying to college once, and don’t need a dry run for high school. I also got the sense that the HS application process took over the 8th grade year and made things competitive among the kids.