Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jlo has had lots of plastic surgery in the past. She’s had her nose and lips thinned out. She looked more Puerto Rican when she was on In Living Color. I’m sure she’s getting other stuff like face lifts in her old age.

Yes this. She has had plastic surgery plus I'll bet a mini/lower face lift. I think that is how she can not have and nasolabial folds at 50 without fillers. She had the mini lift.

She definitely had a lower facelift/neck lift and uses Ultherapy type lasers to keep that jawline razor sharp.

And she looks great- not overdone like many celebs. I think women like her do a great disservice to the rest of us by pretending that they have aged naturally. She’s clearly had work and it was very well done. She shouldn’t be ashamed of it and she also shouldn’t lead the rest of us to believe this is all natural.

Like PP said, she’s had a ton of plastic surgery since her In Living Color days. Are you really telling us you’d undergo such a transformation in your early career but not rely on dermatology/plastic surgery as you age? Right.

Anonymous wrote:I have that skin and no, it's not good genes, my mom has horrible skin damage. I've been doing a combo of yearly IPL and BBL plus retin-a since I was in my late 20s. After my 2nd pregnancy, I started to get some melasma, so I can't do lasers anymore and switched to profhilo and chemical peels. Since my 30s I've been using heavy duty European sunscreen and sun hat. Summary: it's not genes, it's $$$.

Anonymous wrote:If she’s had Botox, I don’t think it’s in the eye area. She doesn’t have that squinty eye Botox look at all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe her when she says she's had no fillers or Botox. I see no evidence of anything in this no makeup selfie, for instance:



I think she just has good genes and takes good care of her skin. I am about 5 years younger and similarly have good skin genes -- women in my family just have really youthful looking skin until about 60 when you start to see it. It's not weight related for us, either. It's just how we age. Anyway, this is about how my skin looks now in my late 40s. Some fine lines and crepiness around the eyes, but basically nothing else except when I smile, and then it's just deeper laugh lines than I used to have. I don't have lines on my forehead or between my eyes. No neck wrinkles. And I've had no work done.

I do think she must be ahead of the game in terms of skin care. Like I said, I'm 5 years younger. I am good about retinol (I use an alternative but it has the same impact) and really good about SPF and moisture. But she glows and has always glowed. I think some of that is just natural, she's lucky. But also she clearly takes exceptional care of her skin. She's wealthy and has access to the best of everything. She has no reason to go in for fillers or Botox and I'm glad she hasn't because when you are that naturally beautiful, it would be sad to destroy it just to get rid of a few laugh lines.

That's what she looks like without makeup?! In her 50s?!

Wow. She is even better looking than I previously thought.

If you think she's not wearing make up there, I've got a few bridges to sell you...

As an asian, what I find incredible is that her skin has very little sign of sun damage.
She doesn't look that dark w/o make up (meaning not so much melanin protection) and my guess is that she has not lead a lifestyle that religiously avoided the sun since childhood (absolutely no judgement on that, just assuming that was not her culture) so how does she end up with skin looking like that? Even with lasers, peels, botox plus your usual celebrity ($$$) skin care regimen, I really don't see how anyone can retain that kind of skin absent just really, really good genes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe her when she says she's had no fillers or Botox. I see no evidence of anything in this no makeup selfie, for instance:



I think she just has good genes and takes good care of her skin. I am about 5 years younger and similarly have good skin genes -- women in my family just have really youthful looking skin until about 60 when you start to see it. It's not weight related for us, either. It's just how we age. Anyway, this is about how my skin looks now in my late 40s. Some fine lines and crepiness around the eyes, but basically nothing else except when I smile, and then it's just deeper laugh lines than I used to have. I don't have lines on my forehead or between my eyes. No neck wrinkles. And I've had no work done.

I do think she must be ahead of the game in terms of skin care. Like I said, I'm 5 years younger. I am good about retinol (I use an alternative but it has the same impact) and really good about SPF and moisture. But she glows and has always glowed. I think some of that is just natural, she's lucky. But also she clearly takes exceptional care of her skin. She's wealthy and has access to the best of everything. She has no reason to go in for fillers or Botox and I'm glad she hasn't because when you are that naturally beautiful, it would be sad to destroy it just to get rid of a few laugh lines.

That's what she looks like without makeup?! In her 50s?!

Wow. She is even better looking than I previously thought.

If you think she's not wearing make up there, I've got a few bridges to sell you...

As an asian, what I find incredible is that her skin has very little sign of sun damage.
She doesn't look that dark w/o make up (meaning not so much melanin protection) and my guess is that she has not lead a lifestyle that religiously avoided the sun since childhood (absolutely no judgement on that, just assuming that was not her culture) so how does she end up with skin looking like that? Even with lasers, peels, botox plus your usual celebrity ($$$) skin care regimen, I really don't see how anyone can retain that kind of skin absent just really, really good genes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe her when she says she's had no fillers or Botox. I see no evidence of anything in this no makeup selfie, for instance:



I think she just has good genes and takes good care of her skin. I am about 5 years younger and similarly have good skin genes -- women in my family just have really youthful looking skin until about 60 when you start to see it. It's not weight related for us, either. It's just how we age. Anyway, this is about how my skin looks now in my late 40s. Some fine lines and crepiness around the eyes, but basically nothing else except when I smile, and then it's just deeper laugh lines than I used to have. I don't have lines on my forehead or between my eyes. No neck wrinkles. And I've had no work done.

I do think she must be ahead of the game in terms of skin care. Like I said, I'm 5 years younger. I am good about retinol (I use an alternative but it has the same impact) and really good about SPF and moisture. But she glows and has always glowed. I think some of that is just natural, she's lucky. But also she clearly takes exceptional care of her skin. She's wealthy and has access to the best of everything. She has no reason to go in for fillers or Botox and I'm glad she hasn't because when you are that naturally beautiful, it would be sad to destroy it just to get rid of a few laugh lines.

That's what she looks like without makeup?! In her 50s?!

Wow. She is even better looking than I previously thought.

If you think she's not wearing make up there, I've got a few bridges to sell you...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe her when she says she's had no fillers or Botox. I see no evidence of anything in this no makeup selfie, for instance:



I think she just has good genes and takes good care of her skin. I am about 5 years younger and similarly have good skin genes -- women in my family just have really youthful looking skin until about 60 when you start to see it. It's not weight related for us, either. It's just how we age. Anyway, this is about how my skin looks now in my late 40s. Some fine lines and crepiness around the eyes, but basically nothing else except when I smile, and then it's just deeper laugh lines than I used to have. I don't have lines on my forehead or between my eyes. No neck wrinkles. And I've had no work done.

I do think she must be ahead of the game in terms of skin care. Like I said, I'm 5 years younger. I am good about retinol (I use an alternative but it has the same impact) and really good about SPF and moisture. But she glows and has always glowed. I think some of that is just natural, she's lucky. But also she clearly takes exceptional care of her skin. She's wealthy and has access to the best of everything. She has no reason to go in for fillers or Botox and I'm glad she hasn't because when you are that naturally beautiful, it would be sad to destroy it just to get rid of a few laugh lines.

That's what she looks like without makeup?! In her 50s?!

Wow. She is even better looking than I previously thought.

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s hilarious people are saying this is because she is Latin. Have you all not seen the average Latin woman in this area? There are not many 50 year olds with the same background that look like j lo.

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s hilarious people are saying this is because she is Latin. Have you all not seen the average Latin woman in this area? There are not many 50 year olds with the same background that look like j lo.