Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This sounds like San Francisco about 20 years ago. I remember being surprised as a tourist to being far outnumbered in certain areas of San Francisco -- easily 10 or more homeless in some places.
If DC residents don't do something about this, homeless will flock to DC.
+100 Cities like SF and DC are magnets for homelessness. In fact, I think they create MORE homelessness by making it easy to be homeless. You don't see half naked, shitting in the street, smelly, drug-adled people taking over in non-ultra liberal cities. The crazy lefties will only offer more and more incentives to be homeless though. It's a death spiral situation.
Anonymous wrote:So it seems that traveling to DC is not the safest thing to do via Amtrak or the busses I’m sure people planning vacations/ weekend getaways are not going to want to go through homeless encampments. This along with the recent crime wave in areas like Georgetown are only going to further hurt tourism.
Anonymous wrote:Homeless camped out in the north side of DuPont circle. Homeless tents in the grass in front of union station. Homeless tents in key downtown parks/squares.
It's embarrassing for DC as as a city and frankly disgusting.
I was in union station yesterday - first time since the pandemic - and was surprised to see so many tents in the circle out front. I had to go to the bathroom before catching a train and almost threw up while squeezing past the awful smelling homeless people going in and out of the bathroom with all their belongings in tow. What the heck kind of city are we living in?? Business people and families need places like union station and public space to be clean, hygienic, and safe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There aren’t enough homeless shelters / resources for these people. When you get a bunch of NIMBYs blocking developments geared toward this population, this is what happens. Our city also needs more counseling and psychological support, a lot of these people don’t want to be in permanent housing.
Have a little compassion for those out on the streets. Be grateful you can afford to live in an expensive city and not out on the streets.
I’ve read that this is untrue and there is in fact housing/shelters but they are considered undesirable by tent dwellers because there are rules. Can someone who is more knowledgeable about this weigh in.
I knew a homeless man on the streets of DC who wanted to go to a shelter or permanent housing but being an older gentleman with a drug problem he found that finding permanent housing was almost impossible and the shelters were too dangerous.
He tried to go to a shelter in Va., but it was too hard to get too and because they are sleep only shelters he had to find somewhere to go during the day. Much easier in the city where you can park yourself in a bench to panhandle during the day.
Yes many of these people have serious addiction issues. Not all addictions can be treated or cured so what do we do? It isn’t a palatable option for many to think that you should take care of people where they are. As in highly dysfunctional people are sometimes homeless because they are highly dysfunctional and always will be but still should have their basic needs met even when they can’t or won’t do it for themselves.
I for one believe they should have clean and safe housing, healthcare and food. Basic comforts it I don’t know what the looks like or how that gets delivered when dealing with marginalized populations. We struggle to do the basics for people who are undergoing what should or could be temporary periods of dysfunction.
What people actually want, but won't say, is for basic facilities to be setup out of sight such as under overpasses that aren't common walkways. Permanent housing is pie in the sky bs and allowing the mentally ill to occupy libraries and Union Station is totally unacceptable.
No, they should be actively moved into shelters and treatment programs (both of which are generously funded in DC) or else they need to move along. We should not allow these dangerous and unsanitary tent cities to flourish, which are really a disservice to both the housed and unhoused.
Agree. Had to go to Union Station today and it was just ugly to see the tent city that’s been allowed to sprout up in front of the station. It looks like a San Francisco in the making - these folks need to be in shelters or treatment centers and not in front of a major civic building. So glad we were not around at night - would be utterly creepy/unsafe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There aren’t enough homeless shelters / resources for these people. When you get a bunch of NIMBYs blocking developments geared toward this population, this is what happens. Our city also needs more counseling and psychological support, a lot of these people don’t want to be in permanent housing.
Have a little compassion for those out on the streets. Be grateful you can afford to live in an expensive city and not out on the streets.
I’ve read that this is untrue and there is in fact housing/shelters but they are considered undesirable by tent dwellers because there are rules. Can someone who is more knowledgeable about this weigh in.
I knew a homeless man on the streets of DC who wanted to go to a shelter or permanent housing but being an older gentleman with a drug problem he found that finding permanent housing was almost impossible and the shelters were too dangerous.
He tried to go to a shelter in Va., but it was too hard to get too and because they are sleep only shelters he had to find somewhere to go during the day. Much easier in the city where you can park yourself in a bench to panhandle during the day.
Yes many of these people have serious addiction issues. Not all addictions can be treated or cured so what do we do? It isn’t a palatable option for many to think that you should take care of people where they are. As in highly dysfunctional people are sometimes homeless because they are highly dysfunctional and always will be but still should have their basic needs met even when they can’t or won’t do it for themselves.
I for one believe they should have clean and safe housing, healthcare and food. Basic comforts it I don’t know what the looks like or how that gets delivered when dealing with marginalized populations. We struggle to do the basics for people who are undergoing what should or could be temporary periods of dysfunction.
What people actually want, but won't say, is for basic facilities to be setup out of sight such as under overpasses that aren't common walkways. Permanent housing is pie in the sky bs and allowing the mentally ill to occupy libraries and Union Station is totally unacceptable.
No, they should be actively moved into shelters and treatment programs (both of which are generously funded in DC) or else they need to move along. We should not allow these dangerous and unsanitary tent cities to flourish, which are really a disservice to both the housed and unhoused.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There aren’t enough homeless shelters / resources for these people. When you get a bunch of NIMBYs blocking developments geared toward this population, this is what happens. Our city also needs more counseling and psychological support, a lot of these people don’t want to be in permanent housing.
Have a little compassion for those out on the streets. Be grateful you can afford to live in an expensive city and not out on the streets.
I’ve read that this is untrue and there is in fact housing/shelters but they are considered undesirable by tent dwellers because there are rules. Can someone who is more knowledgeable about this weigh in.
I knew a homeless man on the streets of DC who wanted to go to a shelter or permanent housing but being an older gentleman with a drug problem he found that finding permanent housing was almost impossible and the shelters were too dangerous.
He tried to go to a shelter in Va., but it was too hard to get too and because they are sleep only shelters he had to find somewhere to go during the day. Much easier in the city where you can park yourself in a bench to panhandle during the day.
Yes many of these people have serious addiction issues. Not all addictions can be treated or cured so what do we do? It isn’t a palatable option for many to think that you should take care of people where they are. As in highly dysfunctional people are sometimes homeless because they are highly dysfunctional and always will be but still should have their basic needs met even when they can’t or won’t do it for themselves.
I for one believe they should have clean and safe housing, healthcare and food. Basic comforts it I don’t know what the looks like or how that gets delivered when dealing with marginalized populations. We struggle to do the basics for people who are undergoing what should or could be temporary periods of dysfunction.
What people actually want, but won't say, is for basic facilities to be setup out of sight such as under overpasses that aren't common walkways. Permanent housing is pie in the sky bs and allowing the mentally ill to occupy libraries and Union Station is totally unacceptable.
No, they should be actively moved into shelters and treatment programs (both of which are generously funded in DC) or else they need to move along. We should not allow these dangerous and unsanitary tent cities to flourish, which are really a disservice to both the housed and unhoused.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There aren’t enough homeless shelters / resources for these people. When you get a bunch of NIMBYs blocking developments geared toward this population, this is what happens. Our city also needs more counseling and psychological support, a lot of these people don’t want to be in permanent housing.
Have a little compassion for those out on the streets. Be grateful you can afford to live in an expensive city and not out on the streets.
I’ve read that this is untrue and there is in fact housing/shelters but they are considered undesirable by tent dwellers because there are rules. Can someone who is more knowledgeable about this weigh in.
I knew a homeless man on the streets of DC who wanted to go to a shelter or permanent housing but being an older gentleman with a drug problem he found that finding permanent housing was almost impossible and the shelters were too dangerous.
He tried to go to a shelter in Va., but it was too hard to get too and because they are sleep only shelters he had to find somewhere to go during the day. Much easier in the city where you can park yourself in a bench to panhandle during the day.
Yes many of these people have serious addiction issues. Not all addictions can be treated or cured so what do we do? It isn’t a palatable option for many to think that you should take care of people where they are. As in highly dysfunctional people are sometimes homeless because they are highly dysfunctional and always will be but still should have their basic needs met even when they can’t or won’t do it for themselves.
I for one believe they should have clean and safe housing, healthcare and food. Basic comforts it I don’t know what the looks like or how that gets delivered when dealing with marginalized populations. We struggle to do the basics for people who are undergoing what should or could be temporary periods of dysfunction.
What people actually want, but won't say, is for basic facilities to be setup out of sight such as under overpasses that aren't common walkways. Permanent housing is pie in the sky bs and allowing the mentally ill to occupy libraries and Union Station is totally unacceptable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There aren’t enough homeless shelters / resources for these people. When you get a bunch of NIMBYs blocking developments geared toward this population, this is what happens. Our city also needs more counseling and psychological support, a lot of these people don’t want to be in permanent housing.
Have a little compassion for those out on the streets. Be grateful you can afford to live in an expensive city and not out on the streets.
I’ve read that this is untrue and there is in fact housing/shelters but they are considered undesirable by tent dwellers because there are rules. Can someone who is more knowledgeable about this weigh in.
I knew a homeless man on the streets of DC who wanted to go to a shelter or permanent housing but being an older gentleman with a drug problem he found that finding permanent housing was almost impossible and the shelters were too dangerous.
He tried to go to a shelter in Va., but it was too hard to get too and because they are sleep only shelters he had to find somewhere to go during the day. Much easier in the city where you can park yourself in a bench to panhandle during the day.
Yes many of these people have serious addiction issues. Not all addictions can be treated or cured so what do we do? It isn’t a palatable option for many to think that you should take care of people where they are. As in highly dysfunctional people are sometimes homeless because they are highly dysfunctional and always will be but still should have their basic needs met even when they can’t or won’t do it for themselves.
I for one believe they should have clean and safe housing, healthcare and food. Basic comforts it I don’t know what the looks like or how that gets delivered when dealing with marginalized populations. We struggle to do the basics for people who are undergoing what should or could be temporary periods of dysfunction.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There aren’t enough homeless shelters / resources for these people. When you get a bunch of NIMBYs blocking developments geared toward this population, this is what happens. Our city also needs more counseling and psychological support, a lot of these people don’t want to be in permanent housing.
Have a little compassion for those out on the streets. Be grateful you can afford to live in an expensive city and not out on the streets.
I’ve read that this is untrue and there is in fact housing/shelters but they are considered undesirable by tent dwellers because there are rules. Can someone who is more knowledgeable about this weigh in.
Anonymous wrote:We need affordable housing, not more luxury condos! But affordable housing is not a popular political topic. BTW, this is not a DC-specific problem. Take a trip to LA or SF and you'll realize that the problem in DC is nothing comparatively.