Anonymous wrote:Really another STA thread on this forum.
You see enough STA threads on the Independent / private schools thread.
I’ve never met a more arrogant community in my life.
You do understand that it was clearly not a STA parent that started this thread, right? So your post is off base and weird.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The truth is the truth and sometimes it hurts. "Very Good" were your words, so just provided reality and context. You can re-word it anyway you like ("on a relative basis"), but your original statement was a bit of a stretch. It was also a question, so answered. Are there 3-5 STA boys who play club lacrosse per grade probably, are they all "very good" or future commits unlikely. Having 3-5 decent players does not equate to being competitive or successful in the IAC. You need a lot more than that. Look at the history and appreciate the comparison to other schools (the reality check). You can recognize the 2023 class is great for STA, but not a new trend and not the start of IAC dominance. That is a bridge to far. They would need double the recruits and a much stronger bench to compete against the big boys.
Dude chill. I think you are missing the point that the three D1 commits at STA probably don’t care if they ever win the IAC. That ain’t the end all be all for the STA gang. Their standing in the IAC has no impact on their ability to play in college. The commits are all on good club teams. Boys who care about winning IAC lax definitely should not go to STA. But good lax players who play for good clubs and are otherwise inclined to attend STA should know they can be very recruitable, IAC record notwithstanding.
Dude, only STA parents say their boys don't care about winning the IAC. News Flash, they actually do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The truth is the truth and sometimes it hurts. "Very Good" were your words, so just provided reality and context. You can re-word it anyway you like ("on a relative basis"), but your original statement was a bit of a stretch. It was also a question, so answered. Are there 3-5 STA boys who play club lacrosse per grade probably, are they all "very good" or future commits unlikely. Having 3-5 decent players does not equate to being competitive or successful in the IAC. You need a lot more than that. Look at the history and appreciate the comparison to other schools (the reality check). You can recognize the 2023 class is great for STA, but not a new trend and not the start of IAC dominance. That is a bridge to far. They would need double the recruits and a much stronger bench to compete against the big boys.
Or is it a bridge “too” far? Grammar counts at STA though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The truth is the truth and sometimes it hurts. "Very Good" were your words, so just provided reality and context. You can re-word it anyway you like ("on a relative basis"), but your original statement was a bit of a stretch. It was also a question, so answered. Are there 3-5 STA boys who play club lacrosse per grade probably, are they all "very good" or future commits unlikely. Having 3-5 decent players does not equate to being competitive or successful in the IAC. You need a lot more than that. Look at the history and appreciate the comparison to other schools (the reality check). You can recognize the 2023 class is great for STA, but not a new trend and not the start of IAC dominance. That is a bridge to far. They would need double the recruits and a much stronger bench to compete against the big boys.
Dude chill. I think you are missing the point that the three D1 commits at STA probably don’t care if they ever win the IAC. That ain’t the end all be all for the STA gang. Their standing in the IAC has no impact on their ability to play in college. The commits are all on good club teams. Boys who care about winning IAC lax definitely should not go to STA. But good lax players who play for good clubs and are otherwise inclined to attend STA should know they can be very recruitable, IAC record notwithstanding.
Anonymous wrote:Excuses, excuses. The larger schools could easily have very few good lacrosse players. Just because you have larger numbers doesn't mean you have top athletes or players for any given sport. And if you want to use that excuse, then just compare STA to Landon, Bullis, or SSSA (as you said). They have double and triple the amount of commits each year than STA, so your excuse is just that, an excuse, and ridiculous.
You should realize that you are responding to different posters. Also, you are the worst cliche of the insufferable lax dads who have stood on the sidelines (usually the same side side as the players) coaching your kid since he was 8. Just pathetic.
Anonymous wrote:The truth is the truth and sometimes it hurts. "Very Good" were your words, so just provided reality and context. You can re-word it anyway you like ("on a relative basis"), but your original statement was a bit of a stretch. It was also a question, so answered. Are there 3-5 STA boys who play club lacrosse per grade probably, are they all "very good" or future commits unlikely. Having 3-5 decent players does not equate to being competitive or successful in the IAC. You need a lot more than that. Look at the history and appreciate the comparison to other schools (the reality check). You can recognize the 2023 class is great for STA, but not a new trend and not the start of IAC dominance. That is a bridge to far. They would need double the recruits and a much stronger bench to compete against the big boys.
Anonymous wrote:The truth is the truth and sometimes it hurts. "Very Good" were your words, so just provided reality and context. You can re-word it anyway you like ("on a relative basis"), but your original statement was a bit of a stretch. It was also a question, so answered. Are there 3-5 STA boys who play club lacrosse per grade probably, are they all "very good" or future commits unlikely. Having 3-5 decent players does not equate to being competitive or successful in the IAC. You need a lot more than that. Look at the history and appreciate the comparison to other schools (the reality check). You can recognize the 2023 class is great for STA, but not a new trend and not the start of IAC dominance. That is a bridge to far. They would need double the recruits and a much stronger bench to compete against the big boys.
Anonymous wrote:Look, I’m sorry you have a bee in your bonnet about STA lacrosse or that it triggers you. I have no dog in the fight and commenting on personal observations and conversations. We are essentially saying the same thing but for the fact that you find it completely implausible if not impossible that STA has some talent in the LS “relative” to their peers at other schools. Please calm down now. Thanks.