Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was through M Street this AM and was surprised. Pretty awful aesthetically and functionally, unless the goal is to discourage people from coming to Georgetown? If that’s the case, they’ve don’t a great job.

I completely disagree. Georgetown is much more pleasant with wider sidewalks. It seems most others agree, as it feels busier than ever.

Unfortunately, it’s not “busier than ever”. Do historic streets lined with depression grey-painted jersey barriers provide a welcoming aesthetic for a neighborhood highly dependent on attracting people to come and spend money? It looks it it’s working for you personally but it seems that you are not representative of general consumers.

https://dcist.com/story/21/03/11/georgetown-pushes-to-overcome-its-flurry-of-closures/

DP. I agree that the streets of Georgetown would be much more attractive with permanently wider sidewalks and fewer cars, driving or parked. The jersey walls should only be a temporary solution.

They could commission artists to paint them. They could instead use different materials in keeping with the historic character of the neighborhood, like iron. They could extend the sidewalk. They could go back to way it used to be. Instead they have chosen to make Georgetown look like it’s under military occupation, which is absolutely the worst possible choice for this historic neighborhood.

Actually I think that the omnipresent, unhistorical cars have a far bigger aesthetic and functional impact than the jersey walls on the historic character of Georgetown.

I am not sure what you are advocating, unless less safe streets and a return to horses and buggies (notably automobiles were originally called horseless carriages afterall).

The unpleasant aesthetics aside, particularly on the quality of the streetscape, the jersey barriers make the neighborhood less safe. Research demonstrates that barriers, and a jersey barrier is the most extreme, create less safe road conditions. Shared streets, particularly removing barriers, is the safest approach that would improve safety and the quality of the neighborhood.

Banning cars built post-WWII in georgetown? that actually is a really good idea. Why do we only regulate the buildings, but not cars in georgetown? Seems like a missed opportunity.

Why stop at cars? Let’s ban all post WWII technology.

Did the history of Georgetown stop at WWII? I don’t get why that’s such an important date. Someone previously said the year 1800 was the most important date. Is there a reason for that? What was important about 1800?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was through M Street this AM and was surprised. Pretty awful aesthetically and functionally, unless the goal is to discourage people from coming to Georgetown? If that’s the case, they’ve don’t a great job.

I completely disagree. Georgetown is much more pleasant with wider sidewalks. It seems most others agree, as it feels busier than ever.

Unfortunately, it’s not “busier than ever”. Do historic streets lined with depression grey-painted jersey barriers provide a welcoming aesthetic for a neighborhood highly dependent on attracting people to come and spend money? It looks it it’s working for you personally but it seems that you are not representative of general consumers.

https://dcist.com/story/21/03/11/georgetown-pushes-to-overcome-its-flurry-of-closures/

DP. I agree that the streets of Georgetown would be much more attractive with permanently wider sidewalks and fewer cars, driving or parked. The jersey walls should only be a temporary solution.

They could commission artists to paint them. They could instead use different materials in keeping with the historic character of the neighborhood, like iron. They could extend the sidewalk. They could go back to way it used to be. Instead they have chosen to make Georgetown look like it’s under military occupation, which is absolutely the worst possible choice for this historic neighborhood.

Actually I think that the omnipresent, unhistorical cars have a far bigger aesthetic and functional impact than the jersey walls on the historic character of Georgetown.

I am not sure what you are advocating, unless less safe streets and a return to horses and buggies (notably automobiles were originally called horseless carriages afterall).

The unpleasant aesthetics aside, particularly on the quality of the streetscape, the jersey barriers make the neighborhood less safe. Research demonstrates that barriers, and a jersey barrier is the most extreme, create less safe road conditions. Shared streets, particularly removing barriers, is the safest approach that would improve safety and the quality of the neighborhood.

Banning cars built post-WWII in georgetown? that actually is a really good idea. Why do we only regulate the buildings, but not cars in georgetown? Seems like a missed opportunity.

Why stop at cars? Let’s ban all post WWII technology.

Anonymous wrote:
Why stop at cars? Let’s ban all post WWII technology.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was through M Street this AM and was surprised. Pretty awful aesthetically and functionally, unless the goal is to discourage people from coming to Georgetown? If that’s the case, they’ve don’t a great job.

I completely disagree. Georgetown is much more pleasant with wider sidewalks. It seems most others agree, as it feels busier than ever.

Unfortunately, it’s not “busier than ever”. Do historic streets lined with depression grey-painted jersey barriers provide a welcoming aesthetic for a neighborhood highly dependent on attracting people to come and spend money? It looks it it’s working for you personally but it seems that you are not representative of general consumers.

https://dcist.com/story/21/03/11/georgetown-pushes-to-overcome-its-flurry-of-closures/

DP. I agree that the streets of Georgetown would be much more attractive with permanently wider sidewalks and fewer cars, driving or parked. The jersey walls should only be a temporary solution.

They could commission artists to paint them. They could instead use different materials in keeping with the historic character of the neighborhood, like iron. They could extend the sidewalk. They could go back to way it used to be. Instead they have chosen to make Georgetown look like it’s under military occupation, which is absolutely the worst possible choice for this historic neighborhood.

Actually I think that the omnipresent, unhistorical cars have a far bigger aesthetic and functional impact than the jersey walls on the historic character of Georgetown.

I am not sure what you are advocating, unless less safe streets and a return to horses and buggies (notably automobiles were originally called horseless carriages afterall).

The unpleasant aesthetics aside, particularly on the quality of the streetscape, the jersey barriers make the neighborhood less safe. Research demonstrates that barriers, and a jersey barrier is the most extreme, create less safe road conditions. Shared streets, particularly removing barriers, is the safest approach that would improve safety and the quality of the neighborhood.

Banning cars built post-WWII in georgetown? that actually is a really good idea. Why do we only regulate the buildings, but not cars in georgetown? Seems like a missed opportunity.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are plenty empty office buildings and shopping centers along major roads in MC. Why don’t County repurpose them to residential usage first? Environmentally, it puts people near transit so less spread and pollution. More green space will be saved.

What does this have to do with dangerous and unsightly depression grey jersey barriers in Georgetown.

How are they dangerous? Other than that it's more dangerous for a driver to hit a jersey wall than a sidewalk with pedestrians.

They increase the likelihood of accidents.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was through M Street this AM and was surprised. Pretty awful aesthetically and functionally, unless the goal is to discourage people from coming to Georgetown? If that’s the case, they’ve don’t a great job.

I completely disagree. Georgetown is much more pleasant with wider sidewalks. It seems most others agree, as it feels busier than ever.

Unfortunately, it’s not “busier than ever”. Do historic streets lined with depression grey-painted jersey barriers provide a welcoming aesthetic for a neighborhood highly dependent on attracting people to come and spend money? It looks it it’s working for you personally but it seems that you are not representative of general consumers.

https://dcist.com/story/21/03/11/georgetown-pushes-to-overcome-its-flurry-of-closures/

DP. I agree that the streets of Georgetown would be much more attractive with permanently wider sidewalks and fewer cars, driving or parked. The jersey walls should only be a temporary solution.

They could commission artists to paint them. They could instead use different materials in keeping with the historic character of the neighborhood, like iron. They could extend the sidewalk. They could go back to way it used to be. Instead they have chosen to make Georgetown look like it’s under military occupation, which is absolutely the worst possible choice for this historic neighborhood.

Actually I think that the omnipresent, unhistorical cars have a far bigger aesthetic and functional impact than the jersey walls on the historic character of Georgetown.

I am not sure what you are advocating, unless less safe streets and a return to horses and buggies (notably automobiles were originally called horseless carriages afterall).

The unpleasant aesthetics aside, particularly on the quality of the streetscape, the jersey barriers make the neighborhood less safe. Research demonstrates that barriers, and a jersey barrier is the most extreme, create less safe road conditions. Shared streets, particularly removing barriers, is the safest approach that would improve safety and the quality of the neighborhood.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are plenty empty office buildings and shopping centers along major roads in MC. Why don’t County repurpose them to residential usage first? Environmentally, it puts people near transit so less spread and pollution. More green space will be saved.

What does this have to do with dangerous and unsightly depression grey jersey barriers in Georgetown.

How are they dangerous? Other than that it's more dangerous for a driver to hit a jersey wall than a sidewalk with pedestrians.

They increase the likelihood of accidents.

Citation please. Specifically, about jersey walls increasing the likelihood of crashes on city streets with frequent traffic signals and lots of pedestrians, bicyclists, and buses using the roads.

Does the "citation" need to also only be relevant for historic districts? LOL.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are plenty empty office buildings and shopping centers along major roads in MC. Why don’t County repurpose them to residential usage first? Environmentally, it puts people near transit so less spread and pollution. More green space will be saved.

What does this have to do with dangerous and unsightly depression grey jersey barriers in Georgetown.

How are they dangerous? Other than that it's more dangerous for a driver to hit a jersey wall than a sidewalk with pedestrians.

They increase the likelihood of accidents.

Citation please. Specifically, about jersey walls increasing the likelihood of crashes on city streets with frequent traffic signals and lots of pedestrians, bicyclists, and buses using the roads.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are plenty empty office buildings and shopping centers along major roads in MC. Why don’t County repurpose them to residential usage first? Environmentally, it puts people near transit so less spread and pollution. More green space will be saved.

What does this have to do with dangerous and unsightly depression grey jersey barriers in Georgetown.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are plenty empty office buildings and shopping centers along major roads in MC. Why don’t County repurpose them to residential usage first? Environmentally, it puts people near transit so less spread and pollution. More green space will be saved.

What does this have to do with dangerous and unsightly depression grey jersey barriers in Georgetown.

How are they dangerous? Other than that it's more dangerous for a driver to hit a jersey wall than a sidewalk with pedestrians.

They increase the likelihood of accidents.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are plenty empty office buildings and shopping centers along major roads in MC. Why don’t County repurpose them to residential usage first? Environmentally, it puts people near transit so less spread and pollution. More green space will be saved.

What does this have to do with dangerous and unsightly depression grey jersey barriers in Georgetown.

How are they dangerous? Other than that it's more dangerous for a driver to hit a jersey wall than a sidewalk with pedestrians.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are plenty empty office buildings and shopping centers along major roads in MC. Why don’t County repurpose them to residential usage first? Environmentally, it puts people near transit so less spread and pollution. More green space will be saved.

What does this have to do with dangerous and unsightly depression grey jersey barriers in Georgetown.

Anonymous wrote:There are plenty empty office buildings and shopping centers along major roads in MC. Why don’t County repurpose them to residential usage first? Environmentally, it puts people near transit so less spread and pollution. More green space will be saved.

Anonymous wrote:There are plenty empty office buildings and shopping centers along major roads in MC. Why don’t County repurpose them to residential usage first? Environmentally, it puts people near transit so less spread and pollution. More green space will be saved.