Anonymous wrote:Still no teacher?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The 4X4 schedule is the single reason we are considering not sending our kid to wilson next year. Asinine.
+1 that and the idiotic attempt to "AP for all" in the spring (and the canceling of AP World history for sophomore last year to combact racism). we happily sent our junion to Wilson and deeply regret it. she is one of the kids now without the physics teacher. third week and all she has is an article on Canvas about electromagnetism. i wrote to the school protesting and asking when the teacher was supposed to be back and got a "we apologize for the problem, we will send an email around today or tomorrow" and then no email was ever sent. my 7th grader at Deal will go to Wilson over my dead body.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those parents saying their kids nailed the APs with some review in the spring, which APs did you child take? Genuinely curious- I could see for APUSH or AP Lang that that might work. But AP Chem or Calc BC? That would be more difficult.
APush and AP Chem...so, one from column A and one from column B, and fine outcomes on both.
If there is any statistical evidence that the 4X4 schedule presents a problem for AP's, I'd like to see it. But the histrionics appear to be based on the fact that it is different, not any evidence that it is bad. So I think everyone should calm down.
I mean, the title of this thread and the original problem suggests one significant problem with 4x4.
All available research suggests that the 4x4 schedule is detrimental to APs and most outcomes, except graduation rates (because it’s easier for kids to retake classes they fail.)
Majority of kids aren't in AP. I like the split schedule with longer classes as it gives more instruction time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those parents saying their kids nailed the APs with some review in the spring, which APs did you child take? Genuinely curious- I could see for APUSH or AP Lang that that might work. But AP Chem or Calc BC? That would be more difficult.
APush and AP Chem...so, one from column A and one from column B, and fine outcomes on both.
If there is any statistical evidence that the 4X4 schedule presents a problem for AP's, I'd like to see it. But the histrionics appear to be based on the fact that it is different, not any evidence that it is bad. So I think everyone should calm down.
I mean, the title of this thread and the original problem suggests one significant problem with 4x4.
All available research suggests that the 4x4 schedule is detrimental to APs and most outcomes, except graduation rates (because it’s easier for kids to retake classes they fail.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those parents saying their kids nailed the APs with some review in the spring, which APs did you child take? Genuinely curious- I could see for APUSH or AP Lang that that might work. But AP Chem or Calc BC? That would be more difficult.
APush and AP Chem...so, one from column A and one from column B, and fine outcomes on both.
If there is any statistical evidence that the 4X4 schedule presents a problem for AP's, I'd like to see it. But the histrionics appear to be based on the fact that it is different, not any evidence that it is bad. So I think everyone should calm down.
I mean, the title of this thread and the original problem suggests one significant problem with 4x4.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It does not sound like anyone is covering the class. That should be unacceptable for college level courses taught at a public high school.
Why shouldn’t Perry Stein research the questions raised by the 4x4 schedule?
The problem is there is a shortage of teachers and substitutes across the nation. I bet the school cannot find anyone. This is why the 4x4 schedule is so damaging because every day that is lost is crucial to instruction. You cannot just make it up later like you can for a full year course. In a perfect world, 4x4 would be fine but not the way things actually work at the present time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those parents saying their kids nailed the APs with some review in the spring, which APs did you child take? Genuinely curious- I could see for APUSH or AP Lang that that might work. But AP Chem or Calc BC? That would be more difficult.
APush and AP Chem...so, one from column A and one from column B, and fine outcomes on both.
If there is any statistical evidence that the 4X4 schedule presents a problem for AP's, I'd like to see it. But the histrionics appear to be based on the fact that it is different, not any evidence that it is bad. So I think everyone should calm down.
Most teachers I have spoken to (about 3 or 4) told me they dislike the new schedule especially for AP classes.
I am a HS AP teacher and really dislike the 4x4. My courses cover a lot of content and I find the kids have no time to absorb the content or get extra help before we’ve moved on to more content. And it’s a very cumulative course so if they don’t understand what we did Monday they are lost in class Tuesday.
Anonymous wrote:It does not sound like anyone is covering the class. That should be unacceptable for college level courses taught at a public high school.
Why shouldn’t Perry Stein research the questions raised by the 4x4 schedule?