Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next time I read anyone bemoaning the discomfort of the Gazans, I will remind myself of the latter's riotous behavior as the latest handful of hostages were released. If there ever was a case to be made for genocide, think Palestinians.

It really is obscene. I will never understand why so many Palestinians support Hamas. A bunch of thugs that bring nothing but misery. Watching these militants swarm those young women hostages was appalling. And this is what Palestinians regard as a victory. It's pathetic.

Not only pathetic, it's actually reflective of innate evil, given the predictable destruction wrought upon the civilian population as a result of their perverse creed and their completely feckless commitment to terrorism as an instrument of change. Until the Palestinians decisively reject Hamas, its political philosophy, and its immorality, and replace it with something civilized, history will continue to repeat itself at their expense and to their sorrow.

Palestinians have the right to use violence to resist foreign occupation.

However your comment is showing a lack of regard for the violent genocide and ethnic cleaning of Palestinians by Israel. Israel is committing crimes against humanity, that govt is a violent apartheid regime.

Israel murdered at least 50,000 Gazans. Do people expect the Palestinians to be grateful to Israel? Not very realistic.

Notably absent in your continual scurrilous antisemitic diatribes is any alternative explanation for how Israel should have responded to Oct. 7. It would seem that in lieu of vituperative attacks on the victims, you could at least offer your insights into what a reasonable reaction would have been to the Palestinian terror attacks of Oct. 7, keeping in mind the continuing attacks by Hamas thereafter until they were forced to capitulate and release the hostages. That abject surrender occurred only after Gaza was largely flattened, and civilian support for Hamas eroded, all thanks to the retaliatory actions of the IDF.

We can be confident that absent those retaliatory actions, the living hostages would still be held by the barbarians who took them. Barbarians who, not incidentally, are Palestinian.

So spare us your sniveling.

Tell us how Palestinians should respond to military occupation without triggering your wrath. What is the appropriate response to land grab? Sad songs?

They were quite on their own within Gaza, with no "military occupation" apart from Hamas, before they decided to rampage through the music festival.

Avoid the answer if you like, it demonstrates the absence of any rationale for Palestinian terror behavior. Because their cannot be any rationale for terror which civilized people can accept.

Explain to us why the acts of terrorism committed by David Ben-Gurion and his fellow terrorists in the Lehi, Irgun, Stern Gang, etc. are acceptable to you?

For that matter, explain to us why the acts of terrorism committed by America’s founding fathers are acceptable to you?

We’ll wait …

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The strong crushed the weak, who in this case more than deserved it. The strong remain strong, the weak are even weaker, and all that's left for the Gazans is 50K dead Palestinians and a lot of rubble. Continuing on the same path, which they show no sign of deviating from, will keep the Gazans enfeebled forever. So shall it ever be, if your rantings are representative of their deep insight into the reasons for their continuing condition.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The strong crushed the weak, who in this case more than deserved it. The strong remain strong, the weak are even weaker, and all that's left for the Gazans is 50K dead Palestinians and a lot of rubble. Continuing on the same path, which they show no sign of deviating from, will keep the Gazans enfeebled forever. So shall it ever be, if your rantings are representative of their deep insight into the reasons for their continuing condition.

+1000

The OP is a psychopathic Nazi!

There are several areas of your blathering drivel that should be filed under “contemptible”.

But, to me at least, the worst of these is the fact that you think Israel is “the strong”. As if a hideous child molester preying on a helpless toddler is “the strong” in comparison to their victim, which fits the bill here.

In reality, Israel is nothing and it’s also absolutely meaningless - at best - to the vast majority of the world. The only thing between third world Israel and the dustbin of history is the welfare they live on, courtesy of Uncle Sam. That’s it. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it.

So get all the high fives from racists, fundamentalist weirdos, and whores in government that sell out for a fistful of shekels while you can, I guess …

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next time I read anyone bemoaning the discomfort of the Gazans, I will remind myself of the latter's riotous behavior as the latest handful of hostages were released. If there ever was a case to be made for genocide, think Palestinians.

It really is obscene. I will never understand why so many Palestinians support Hamas. A bunch of thugs that bring nothing but misery. Watching these militants swarm those young women hostages was appalling. And this is what Palestinians regard as a victory. It's pathetic.

Not only pathetic, it's actually reflective of innate evil, given the predictable destruction wrought upon the civilian population as a result of their perverse creed and their completely feckless commitment to terrorism as an instrument of change. Until the Palestinians decisively reject Hamas, its political philosophy, and its immorality, and replace it with something civilized, history will continue to repeat itself at their expense and to their sorrow.

Palestinians have the right to use violence to resist foreign occupation.

However your comment is showing a lack of regard for the violent genocide and ethnic cleaning of Palestinians by Israel. Israel is committing crimes against humanity, that govt is a violent apartheid regime.

Israel murdered at least 50,000 Gazans. Do people expect the Palestinians to be grateful to Israel? Not very realistic.

Notably absent in your continual scurrilous antisemitic diatribes is any alternative explanation for how Israel should have responded to Oct. 7. It would seem that in lieu of vituperative attacks on the victims, you could at least offer your insights into what a reasonable reaction would have been to the Palestinian terror attacks of Oct. 7, keeping in mind the continuing attacks by Hamas thereafter until they were forced to capitulate and release the hostages. That abject surrender occurred only after Gaza was largely flattened, and civilian support for Hamas eroded, all thanks to the retaliatory actions of the IDF.

We can be confident that absent those retaliatory actions, the living hostages would still be held by the barbarians who took them. Barbarians who, not incidentally, are Palestinian.

So spare us your sniveling.

Tell us how Palestinians should respond to military occupation without triggering your wrath. What is the appropriate response to land grab? Sad songs?

They were quite on their own within Gaza, with no "military occupation" apart from Hamas, before they decided to rampage through the music festival.

Avoid the answer if you like, it demonstrates the absence of any rationale for Palestinian terror behavior. Because their cannot be any rationale for terror which civilized people can accept.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next time I read anyone bemoaning the discomfort of the Gazans, I will remind myself of the latter's riotous behavior as the latest handful of hostages were released. If there ever was a case to be made for genocide, think Palestinians.

It really is obscene. I will never understand why so many Palestinians support Hamas. A bunch of thugs that bring nothing but misery. Watching these militants swarm those young women hostages was appalling. And this is what Palestinians regard as a victory. It's pathetic.

Not only pathetic, it's actually reflective of innate evil, given the predictable destruction wrought upon the civilian population as a result of their perverse creed and their completely feckless commitment to terrorism as an instrument of change. Until the Palestinians decisively reject Hamas, its political philosophy, and its immorality, and replace it with something civilized, history will continue to repeat itself at their expense and to their sorrow.

Palestinians have the right to use violence to resist foreign occupation.

However your comment is showing a lack of regard for the violent genocide and ethnic cleaning of Palestinians by Israel. Israel is committing crimes against humanity, that govt is a violent apartheid regime.

Israel murdered at least 50,000 Gazans. Do people expect the Palestinians to be grateful to Israel? Not very realistic.

Notably absent in your continual scurrilous antisemitic diatribes is any alternative explanation for how Israel should have responded to Oct. 7. It would seem that in lieu of vituperative attacks on the victims, you could at least offer your insights into what a reasonable reaction would have been to the Palestinian terror attacks of Oct. 7, keeping in mind the continuing attacks by Hamas thereafter until they were forced to capitulate and release the hostages. That abject surrender occurred only after Gaza was largely flattened, and civilian support for Hamas eroded, all thanks to the retaliatory actions of the IDF.

We can be confident that absent those retaliatory actions, the living hostages would still be held by the barbarians who took them. Barbarians who, not incidentally, are Palestinian.

So spare us your sniveling.

Tell us how Palestinians should respond to military occupation without triggering your wrath. What is the appropriate response to land grab? Sad songs?

They were quite on their own within Gaza, with no "military occupation" apart from Hamas, before they decided to rampage through the music festival.

Avoid the answer if you like, it demonstrates the absence of any rationale for Palestinian terror behavior. Because their cannot be any rationale for terror which civilized people can accept.

Anonymous wrote:The strong crushed the weak, who in this case more than deserved it. The strong remain strong, the weak are even weaker, and all that's left for the Gazans is 50K dead Palestinians and a lot of rubble. Continuing on the same path, which they show no sign of deviating from, will keep the Gazans enfeebled forever. So shall it ever be, if your rantings are representative of their deep insight into the reasons for their continuing condition.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next time I read anyone bemoaning the discomfort of the Gazans, I will remind myself of the latter's riotous behavior as the latest handful of hostages were released. If there ever was a case to be made for genocide, think Palestinians.

It really is obscene. I will never understand why so many Palestinians support Hamas. A bunch of thugs that bring nothing but misery. Watching these militants swarm those young women hostages was appalling. And this is what Palestinians regard as a victory. It's pathetic.

Not only pathetic, it's actually reflective of innate evil, given the predictable destruction wrought upon the civilian population as a result of their perverse creed and their completely feckless commitment to terrorism as an instrument of change. Until the Palestinians decisively reject Hamas, its political philosophy, and its immorality, and replace it with something civilized, history will continue to repeat itself at their expense and to their sorrow.

Palestinians have the right to use violence to resist foreign occupation.

However your comment is showing a lack of regard for the violent genocide and ethnic cleaning of Palestinians by Israel. Israel is committing crimes against humanity, that govt is a violent apartheid regime.

Israel murdered at least 50,000 Gazans. Do people expect the Palestinians to be grateful to Israel? Not very realistic.

Notably absent in your continual scurrilous antisemitic diatribes is any alternative explanation for how Israel should have responded to Oct. 7. It would seem that in lieu of vituperative attacks on the victims, you could at least offer your insights into what a reasonable reaction would have been to the Palestinian terror attacks of Oct. 7, keeping in mind the continuing attacks by Hamas thereafter until they were forced to capitulate and release the hostages. That abject surrender occurred only after Gaza was largely flattened, and civilian support for Hamas eroded, all thanks to the retaliatory actions of the IDF.

We can be confident that absent those retaliatory actions, the living hostages would still be held by the barbarians who took them. Barbarians who, not incidentally, are Palestinian.

So spare us your sniveling.

Tell us how Palestinians should respond to military occupation without triggering your wrath. What is the appropriate response to land grab? Sad songs?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next time I read anyone bemoaning the discomfort of the Gazans, I will remind myself of the latter's riotous behavior as the latest handful of hostages were released. If there ever was a case to be made for genocide, think Palestinians.

It really is obscene. I will never understand why so many Palestinians support Hamas. A bunch of thugs that bring nothing but misery. Watching these militants swarm those young women hostages was appalling. And this is what Palestinians regard as a victory. It's pathetic.

Not only pathetic, it's actually reflective of innate evil, given the predictable destruction wrought upon the civilian population as a result of their perverse creed and their completely feckless commitment to terrorism as an instrument of change. Until the Palestinians decisively reject Hamas, its political philosophy, and its immorality, and replace it with something civilized, history will continue to repeat itself at their expense and to their sorrow.

Palestinians have the right to use violence to resist foreign occupation.

However your comment is showing a lack of regard for the violent genocide and ethnic cleaning of Palestinians by Israel. Israel is committing crimes against humanity, that govt is a violent apartheid regime.

Israel murdered at least 50,000 Gazans. Do people expect the Palestinians to be grateful to Israel? Not very realistic.

Notably absent in your continual scurrilous antisemitic diatribes is any alternative explanation for how Israel should have responded to Oct. 7. It would seem that in lieu of vituperative attacks on the victims, you could at least offer your insights into what a reasonable reaction would have been to the Palestinian terror attacks of Oct. 7, keeping in mind the continuing attacks by Hamas thereafter until they were forced to capitulate and release the hostages. That abject surrender occurred only after Gaza was largely flattened, and civilian support for Hamas eroded, all thanks to the retaliatory actions of the IDF.

We can be confident that absent those retaliatory actions, the living hostages would still be held by the barbarians who took them. Barbarians who, not incidentally, are Palestinian.

So spare us your sniveling.

Anonymous wrote:The strong crushed the weak, who in this case more than deserved it. The strong remain strong, the weak are even weaker, and all that's left for the Gazans is 50K dead Palestinians and a lot of rubble. Continuing on the same path, which they show no sign of deviating from, will keep the Gazans enfeebled forever. So shall it ever be, if your rantings are representative of their deep insight into the reasons for their continuing condition.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next time I read anyone bemoaning the discomfort of the Gazans, I will remind myself of the latter's riotous behavior as the latest handful of hostages were released. If there ever was a case to be made for genocide, think Palestinians.

It really is obscene. I will never understand why so many Palestinians support Hamas. A bunch of thugs that bring nothing but misery. Watching these militants swarm those young women hostages was appalling. And this is what Palestinians regard as a victory. It's pathetic.

Not only pathetic, it's actually reflective of innate evil, given the predictable destruction wrought upon the civilian population as a result of their perverse creed and their completely feckless commitment to terrorism as an instrument of change. Until the Palestinians decisively reject Hamas, its political philosophy, and its immorality, and replace it with something civilized, history will continue to repeat itself at their expense and to their sorrow.

Palestinians have the right to use violence to resist foreign occupation.

However your comment is showing a lack of regard for the violent genocide and ethnic cleaning of Palestinians by Israel. Israel is committing crimes against humanity, that govt is a violent apartheid regime.

Israel murdered at least 50,000 Gazans. Do people expect the Palestinians to be grateful to Israel? Not very realistic.

Notably absent in your continual scurrilous antisemitic diatribes is any alternative explanation for how Israel should have responded to Oct. 7. It would seem that in lieu of vituperative attacks on the victims, you could at least offer your insights into what a reasonable reaction would have been to the Palestinian terror attacks of Oct. 7, keeping in mind the continuing attacks by Hamas thereafter until they were forced to capitulate and release the hostages. That abject surrender occurred only after Gaza was largely flattened, and civilian support for Hamas eroded, all thanks to the retaliatory actions of the IDF.

We can be confident that absent those retaliatory actions, the living hostages would still be held by the barbarians who took them. Barbarians who, not incidentally, are Palestinian.

So spare us your sniveling.

I mean a ceasefire in exchange for hostages was pretty much on table from day 1 and that’s what the hostages’ families wanted but Netanyahu wanted another war because the only way he stays in power is by prolonging war, and a good chunk of his coalition wants to destroy/ethnically cleanse Gaza.

That was a deliberate choice

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The next time I read anyone bemoaning the discomfort of the Gazans, I will remind myself of the latter's riotous behavior as the latest handful of hostages were released. If there ever was a case to be made for genocide, think Palestinians.

It really is obscene. I will never understand why so many Palestinians support Hamas. A bunch of thugs that bring nothing but misery. Watching these militants swarm those young women hostages was appalling. And this is what Palestinians regard as a victory. It's pathetic.

Not only pathetic, it's actually reflective of innate evil, given the predictable destruction wrought upon the civilian population as a result of their perverse creed and their completely feckless commitment to terrorism as an instrument of change. Until the Palestinians decisively reject Hamas, its political philosophy, and its immorality, and replace it with something civilized, history will continue to repeat itself at their expense and to their sorrow.

Palestinians have the right to use violence to resist foreign occupation.

However your comment is showing a lack of regard for the violent genocide and ethnic cleaning of Palestinians by Israel. Israel is committing crimes against humanity, that govt is a violent apartheid regime.

When you argue that terrorism is a reasonable activity, you necessarily argue that violence is the way to resolve conflict. That being so, the violent response to terrorism is equally valid, and so then are the consequences for the terrorists and the civilians they hide behind. You can't have it both ways, with terror being fine on one side, but a forceful response being indefensible.

The immorality of your argument aside, it's also a ringing endorsement of futility. The terrorists keep losing and civilians keep suffering, day after day, year after year, decade after decade, and there's no reason to think that will ever change. According to you, the correct response to this history is to double down and keep it up until more people die. That's a strange vision for a better world.

Yet you and the pro Israeli crowd justify terrorism and genocide. Let’s face it. Israel is nothing more than religious extremists who see genocide as the way forward. This is like the Nazis blaming the Jews for the holocaust.