Anonymous
Post 11/23/2024 21:17     Subject: 2028 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:M&D lost to Jesters who is ranked 22…but they are a complete team who is just fine. Capital ties Jesters but they suck; have wrong girls on team, coaches want to quit….you people posting this crap are idiots.

Talking a lot of smack for a 3-9-1 team. Bottom line on 28 Blue is they are who we thought they were.


Still don’t get it. After all these years, knowing Capital’s approach (prioritizing competitiveness v game outcomes, playing even rotations v weighting starters - proven to work based on Blue’s annual recruiting success) … you’ll never understand. Checkers v chess but spike that pee wee football, bro.
quote]They've never been a 20s team before. This is funny considering your fellow Capital mom just went bonzo on M&D for results vs one particular team to "prove" Cap's relevance. A typical argument even in juxtaposition to your above rant. M&D is #3. Cap #21. When you add them ALL up.

Good luck making top brackets in the 20s. And getting eyeballs.
#competitiveness
#outcomes



Yes, they have. Please keep up.
Anonymous
Post 11/23/2024 21:16     Subject: 2028 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:One night after eating some gummies I realized there is a non-zero chance that AI will someday be able to hack and reveal the identity of the posters on this forum. We will eventually know who said what and when. Since then I have tried to be way more thoughtful about what I say. Happy Thanksgiving everyone!


I can’t wait to see who said what.
Anonymous
Post 11/23/2024 21:16     Subject: 2028 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Offense not working how about the defense?

LOL. They scored 10 goals in three games. Guess they could have done more to get offense the ball.
It's could've. Or could have.

He must of made a mistake.
Is this a lacrosse message board or an English class?
It's just so far away from what any normal half way educated person would know. It wasn't a troll, but a hopeful suggestion for them to be able to make their way in life in the future, in some small way.


They should of known better.
I'm thinking about using it in my everyday life, because I want people to think that I don't know English at all.
Anonymous
Post 11/23/2024 21:12     Subject: 2028 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:M&D lost to Jesters who is ranked 22…but they are a complete team who is just fine. Capital ties Jesters but they suck; have wrong girls on team, coaches want to quit….you people posting this crap are idiots.

Talking a lot of smack for a 3-9-1 team. Bottom line on 28 Blue is they are who we thought they were.


Still don’t get it. After all these years, knowing Capital’s approach (prioritizing competitiveness v game outcomes, playing even rotations v weighting starters - proven to work based on Blue’s annual recruiting success) … you’ll never understand. Checkers v chess but spike that pee wee football, bro.
quote]They've never been a 20s team before. This is funny considering your fellow Capital mom just went bonzo on M&D for results vs one particular team to "prove" Cap's relevance. A typical argument even in juxtaposition to your above rant. M&D is #3. Cap #21. When you add them ALL up.

Good luck making top brackets in the 20s. And getting eyeballs.
#competitiveness
#outcomes

Anonymous
Post 11/23/2024 21:09     Subject: 2028 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:M&D lost to Jesters who is ranked 22…but they are a complete team who is just fine. Capital ties Jesters but they suck; have wrong girls on team, coaches want to quit….you people posting this crap are idiots.



Talking a lot of smack for a 3-9-1 team. Bottom line on 28 Blue is they are who we thought they were.


Still don’t get it. After all these years, knowing Capital’s approach (prioritizing competitiveness v game outcomes, playing even rotations v weighting starters - proven to work based on Blue’s annual recruiting success) … you’ll never understand. Checkers v chess but spike that pee wee football, bro.


Cool story bruh….


“Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.”
Anonymous
Post 11/23/2024 21:08     Subject: 2028 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Offense not working how about the defense?

LOL. They scored 10 goals in three games. Guess they could have done more to get offense the ball.
It's could've. Or could have.


Is this a lacrosse message board or an English class?
It's just so far away from what any normal half way educated person would know. It wasn't a troll, but a hopeful suggestion for them to be able to make their way in life in the future, in some small way.


They should of known better.
I'm thinking about using it in my everyday life, because I want people to think that I don't know English at all.

Thought you would of known better.
Anonymous
Post 11/23/2024 21:02     Subject: 2028 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:M&D lost to Jesters who is ranked 22…but they are a complete team who is just fine. Capital ties Jesters but they suck; have wrong girls on team, coaches want to quit….you people posting this crap are idiots.



Talking a lot of smack for a 3-9-1 team. Bottom line on 28 Blue is they are who we thought they were.


Still don’t get it. After all these years, knowing Capital’s approach (prioritizing competitiveness v game outcomes, playing even rotations v weighting starters - proven to work based on Blue’s annual recruiting success) … you’ll never understand. Checkers v chess but spike that pee wee football, bro.


Cool story bruh….
Anonymous
Post 11/23/2024 21:01     Subject: 2028 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Offense not working how about the defense?

LOL. They scored 10 goals in three games. Guess they could have done more to get offense the ball.
It's could've. Or could have.


Is this a lacrosse message board or an English class?
It's just so far away from what any normal half way educated person would know. It wasn't a troll, but a hopeful suggestion for them to be able to make their way in life in the future, in some small way.


They should of known better.
I'm thinking about using it in my everyday life, because I want people to think that I don't know English at all.
Anonymous
Post 11/23/2024 20:58     Subject: 2028 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Offense not working how about the defense?

LOL. They scored 10 goals in three games. Guess they could have done more to get offense the ball.
It's could've. Or could have.


Is this a lacrosse message board or an English class?
It's just so far away from what any normal half way educated person would know. It wasn't a troll, but a hopeful suggestion for them to be able to make their way in life in the future, in some small way.


They should of known better.
Anonymous
Post 11/23/2024 20:49     Subject: 2028 Girls Lacrosse

“Small minds cannot grasp great ideas.”
Anonymous
Post 11/23/2024 20:42     Subject: 2028 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Offense not working how about the defense?

LOL. They scored 10 goals in three games. Guess they could have done more to get offense the ball.
It's could've. Or could have.


Is this a lacrosse message board or an English class?
It's just so far away from what any normal half way educated person would know. It wasn't a troll, but a hopeful suggestion for them to be able to make their way in life in the future, in some small way.
Anonymous
Post 11/23/2024 20:37     Subject: 2028 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Offense not working how about the defense?

LOL. They scored 10 goals in three games. Guess they could have done more to get offense the ball.
It's could've. Or could have.


Is this a lacrosse message board or an English class?
Anonymous
Post 11/23/2024 20:37     Subject: 2028 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Offense not working how about the defense?

LOL. They scored 10 goals in three games. Guess they could of done more to get offense the ball.
It's could've. Or could have.


And yet, they didn't do either.


“He is short-sighted who looks only on the path he treads and the wall on which he leans.”
Anonymous
Post 11/23/2024 20:02     Subject: 2028 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Offense not working how about the defense?

LOL. They scored 10 goals in three games. Guess they could of done more to get offense the ball.
It's could've. Or could have.


And yet, they didn't do either.
Anonymous
Post 11/23/2024 20:01     Subject: 2028 Girls Lacrosse

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:M&D lost to Jesters who is ranked 22…but they are a complete team who is just fine. Capital ties Jesters but they suck; have wrong girls on team, coaches want to quit….you people posting this crap are idiots.



Talking a lot of smack for a 3-9-1 team. Bottom line on 28 Blue is they are who we thought they were.


Still don’t get it. After all these years, knowing Capital’s approach (prioritizing competitiveness v game outcomes, playing even rotations v weighting starters - proven to work based on Blue’s annual recruiting success) … you’ll never understand. Checkers v chess but spike that pee wee football, bro.