Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WSJ throws in the towel in Ukraine. Spineless neocons lied for 24 months.
https://www.wsj.com/world/russia/its-time-to-end-magical-thinking-about-russias-defeat-f6d0b8de?mod=djemalertNEWS
Joe loses his second war. We need Trump. The only winner with correct instincts.
Thanks for your insights Vlad
The last thing we need is an insurrectionist fraud cult leader serving as lap dog for the world’s number one war criminal …
Calling Putin the number one war criminal is so October 6th.
Yeah he wants us to think that.
Who do you think armed and trained Hamas to employ their trade mark barbarism towards innocent civilians (with help from Iran)? The weapons used October 7 were licensed by Russia and various credible videos of Russian soldiers training Hamas terrorists.
The Number one war criminal wanted to divert the world’s gaze from his illegal and immoral war in Ukraine in order to buy himself more time to continue his reign of terror in Ukraine.
In the most despicable and cynical way possible he incited the latest Israel Gaza conflict while feigning concern for Palestinians. This is also at the expense of his own people as he doubles his military spending while drastically reducing funds for education, health and other domestic needs. .
He is positively gloating about the middle East crisis and not flossing over his illegal
Violent invasion of Ukraine as he thinks the world is not watching any more.
We are watching and won’t forget the evil he has unleashed on so many innocent people .
This is all true, but what actually led him to it and what is fueling it?
The arrogance of the US thinking we can tell him what to do wrt what he sees as his sphere of influence, much like the US looks at the Western hemisphere under the Monroe doctrine
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe it’s time to stop cornering him so that he doesn’t resort to desperate measures
Cornering? Strange. I don't think you understand, but not surprising. For many Americans, what goes on in Russia is a concept that's difficult to understand.
In the time-period of Putin's early career as a KGB spy, the KGB typically rewarded ruthlessness that achieved results. There were no bounds, no rules, nothing off limits. Assassination, blackmail, intimidation - not a concern for the KGB. It was the perfect environment for a black-belt judo scrapper who grew up on the streets of post-war Leningrad.
I believe he is inherently aggressive. For him, anyone who dares to contradict him is a threat. Appeasement of that type of personality also doesn't end well. Like a jackal circling prey, I believe he will relentlessly pick off the weak first and surprise attack the strong who could offer resistance.
As an example, if he steals something, rapes someone, murders someone - his expectation is you stand and watch; maybe even clap and cheer him on. But this also means that the more you appease, the worse it will be. This is why so many Russians are ambivalent to politics or even sending their children to die in Ukraine. Many are brainwashed sheep. If today milk is white, then it's white. If tomorrow milk is red, then it's red. If nuclear war is discussed as inevitable on television, then nuclear war is inevitable.
It is ironic that you believe that capitulation in Ukraine will solve the issue? You believe Putin will be happy? Will stop on his own? On the contrary, I believe it will accelerate his aggression. The portions of Ukraine being fought over include key natural resources and industry needed to sustain a wider global conflict, to include oil.
![]()
Ask yourself, would you be fine having your child raised under the Russian government? Where the only rule is abeyance absolute power? If so, you're nothing but a slave, my friend.
Hopefully you understand what the Ukrainians are fighting for and why it's important to the World.
Are you an expert on Russia?
Also, Ukraine and Russia are much less different than Ukraine wants the West to think
I happen to agree with “political realists” that Putin’s aggression was caused by the US and NATO flirting with Russia’s neighbors
To me it sounds logical. I think it was more than possible to coexist.
You're arguing Russian propaganda points put to rest about 200 pages ago. It shows just how badly you cling to tainted sources. Seriously, you need to read everything in this thread before commenting.
Reader's Digest Version - Ukraine used to be Russia's most trusted non-ethnic-Russian allies. They were even entrusted with nuclear weapons to fight as the front line of the USSR. Although a lot of things happened, key events in particular I think changed the minds of many Ukrainians. First was Chernobyl. https://time.com/4313139/post-chernobyl-parade/ That broke a fundamental trust amongst many of the common people with Russia. Second was the breakup of the USSR. Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Georgia, etc. all "got out" and nothing bad happened to them (well, at least not from the West). They realized they had "missed their chance" to become NATO allies. Third was probably the 2014 invasion. Again, you can read about that in prior pages. But this is why Russians take such offense to Ukraine flipping them the bird. They're shocked that Ukrainians don't love them and welcome them with flowers when their elderly are killed, children are kidnapped and women raped. Go figure.
The point is that you're under the belief that anyone in the West expects anything but co-existence out of Russia? The War in Ukraine was strictly one-sided. Russia invaded Ukraine on a half-baked premise. You remember Putin's threat "lie-down my darling and take it" threat just before the invasion? You think that's a person who cares about co-existence?
All Russia needs to do is leave Ukraine and poof - the war is over. It's that simple.
Now, will Russian relations with the West ever be the same again? Would you trust a government who's good with burning down city apartment buildings using thermobaric weaponry? Regularly threatening to use nuclear weapons on National TV? But my guess is you've never been to a place like that. Be glad you're here. This could be your hometown:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe it’s time to stop cornering him so that he doesn’t resort to desperate measures
Cornering? Strange. I don't think you understand, but not surprising. For many Americans, what goes on in Russia is a concept that's difficult to understand.
In the time-period of Putin's early career as a KGB spy, the KGB typically rewarded ruthlessness that achieved results. There were no bounds, no rules, nothing off limits. Assassination, blackmail, intimidation - not a concern for the KGB. It was the perfect environment for a black-belt judo scrapper who grew up on the streets of post-war Leningrad.
I believe he is inherently aggressive. For him, anyone who dares to contradict him is a threat. Appeasement of that type of personality also doesn't end well. Like a jackal circling prey, I believe he will relentlessly pick off the weak first and surprise attack the strong who could offer resistance.
As an example, if he steals something, rapes someone, murders someone - his expectation is you stand and watch; maybe even clap and cheer him on. But this also means that the more you appease, the worse it will be. This is why so many Russians are ambivalent to politics or even sending their children to die in Ukraine. Many are brainwashed sheep. If today milk is white, then it's white. If tomorrow milk is red, then it's red. If nuclear war is discussed as inevitable on television, then nuclear war is inevitable.
It is ironic that you believe that capitulation in Ukraine will solve the issue? You believe Putin will be happy? Will stop on his own? On the contrary, I believe it will accelerate his aggression. The portions of Ukraine being fought over include key natural resources and industry needed to sustain a wider global conflict, to include oil.
![]()
Ask yourself, would you be fine having your child raised under the Russian government? Where the only rule is abeyance absolute power? If so, you're nothing but a slave, my friend.
Hopefully you understand what the Ukrainians are fighting for and why it's important to the World.
Are you an expert on Russia?
Also, Ukraine and Russia are much less different than Ukraine wants the West to think
I happen to agree with “political realists” that Putin’s aggression was caused by the US and NATO flirting with Russia’s neighbors
To me it sounds logical. I think it was more than possible to coexist.
The
That makes it even worse that Russia would treat them so badly - with violent disrespect
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe it’s time to stop cornering him so that he doesn’t resort to desperate measures
Cornering? Strange. I don't think you understand, but not surprising. For many Americans, what goes on in Russia is a concept that's difficult to understand.
In the time-period of Putin's early career as a KGB spy, the KGB typically rewarded ruthlessness that achieved results. There were no bounds, no rules, nothing off limits. Assassination, blackmail, intimidation - not a concern for the KGB. It was the perfect environment for a black-belt judo scrapper who grew up on the streets of post-war Leningrad.
I believe he is inherently aggressive. For him, anyone who dares to contradict him is a threat. Appeasement of that type of personality also doesn't end well. Like a jackal circling prey, I believe he will relentlessly pick off the weak first and surprise attack the strong who could offer resistance.
As an example, if he steals something, rapes someone, murders someone - his expectation is you stand and watch; maybe even clap and cheer him on. But this also means that the more you appease, the worse it will be. This is why so many Russians are ambivalent to politics or even sending their children to die in Ukraine. Many are brainwashed sheep. If today milk is white, then it's white. If tomorrow milk is red, then it's red. If nuclear war is discussed as inevitable on television, then nuclear war is inevitable.
It is ironic that you believe that capitulation in Ukraine will solve the issue? You believe Putin will be happy? Will stop on his own? On the contrary, I believe it will accelerate his aggression. The portions of Ukraine being fought over include key natural resources and industry needed to sustain a wider global conflict, to include oil.
![]()
Ask yourself, would you be fine having your child raised under the Russian government? Where the only rule is abeyance absolute power? If so, you're nothing but a slave, my friend.
Hopefully you understand what the Ukrainians are fighting for and why it's important to the World.
Are you an expert on Russia?
Also, Ukraine and Russia are much less different than Ukraine wants the West to think
I happen to agree with “political realists” that Putin’s aggression was caused by the US and NATO flirting with Russia’s neighbors
To me it sounds logical. I think it was more than possible to coexist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WSJ throws in the towel in Ukraine. Spineless neocons lied for 24 months.
https://www.wsj.com/world/russia/its-time-to-end-magical-thinking-about-russias-defeat-f6d0b8de?mod=djemalertNEWS
Joe loses his second war. We need Trump. The only winner with correct instincts.
Thanks for your insights Vlad
The last thing we need is an insurrectionist fraud cult leader serving as lap dog for the world’s number one war criminal …
Calling Putin the number one war criminal is so October 6th.
Yeah he wants us to think that.
Who do you think armed and trained Hamas to employ their trade mark barbarism towards innocent civilians (with help from Iran)? The weapons used October 7 were licensed by Russia and various credible videos of Russian soldiers training Hamas terrorists.
The Number one war criminal wanted to divert the world’s gaze from his illegal and immoral war in Ukraine in order to buy himself more time to continue his reign of terror in Ukraine.
In the most despicable and cynical way possible he incited the latest Israel Gaza conflict while feigning concern for Palestinians. This is also at the expense of his own people as he doubles his military spending while drastically reducing funds for education, health and other domestic needs. .
He is positively gloating about the middle East crisis and not flossing over his illegal
Violent invasion of Ukraine as he thinks the world is not watching any more.
We are watching and won’t forget the evil he has unleashed on so many innocent people .
This is all true, but what actually led him to it and what is fueling it?
The arrogance of the US thinking we can tell him what to do wrt what he sees as his sphere of influence, much like the US looks at the Western hemisphere under the Monroe doctrine
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WSJ throws in the towel in Ukraine. Spineless neocons lied for 24 months.
https://www.wsj.com/world/russia/its-time-to-end-magical-thinking-about-russias-defeat-f6d0b8de?mod=djemalertNEWS
Joe loses his second war. We need Trump. The only winner with correct instincts.
Thanks for your insights Vlad
The last thing we need is an insurrectionist fraud cult leader serving as lap dog for the world’s number one war criminal …
Calling Putin the number one war criminal is so October 6th.
Yeah he wants us to think that.
Who do you think armed and trained Hamas to employ their trade mark barbarism towards innocent civilians (with help from Iran)? The weapons used October 7 were licensed by Russia and various credible videos of Russian soldiers training Hamas terrorists.
The Number one war criminal wanted to divert the world’s gaze from his illegal and immoral war in Ukraine in order to buy himself more time to continue his reign of terror in Ukraine.
In the most despicable and cynical way possible he incited the latest Israel Gaza conflict while feigning concern for Palestinians. This is also at the expense of his own people as he doubles his military spending while drastically reducing funds for education, health and other domestic needs. .
He is positively gloating about the middle East crisis and not flossing over his illegal
Violent invasion of Ukraine as he thinks the world is not watching any more.
We are watching and won’t forget the evil he has unleashed on so many innocent people .
This is all true, but what actually led him to it and what is fueling it?
The arrogance of the US thinking we can tell him what to do wrt what he sees as his sphere of influence, much like the US looks at the Western hemisphere under the Monroe doctrine
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe it’s time to stop cornering him so that he doesn’t resort to desperate measures
Cornering? Strange. I don't think you understand, but not surprising. For many Americans, what goes on in Russia is a concept that's difficult to understand.
In the time-period of Putin's early career as a KGB spy, the KGB typically rewarded ruthlessness that achieved results. There were no bounds, no rules, nothing off limits. Assassination, blackmail, intimidation - not a concern for the KGB. It was the perfect environment for a black-belt judo scrapper who grew up on the streets of post-war Leningrad.
I believe he is inherently aggressive. For him, anyone who dares to contradict him is a threat. Appeasement of that type of personality also doesn't end well. Like a jackal circling prey, I believe he will relentlessly pick off the weak first and surprise attack the strong who could offer resistance.
As an example, if he steals something, rapes someone, murders someone - his expectation is you stand and watch; maybe even clap and cheer him on. But this also means that the more you appease, the worse it will be. This is why so many Russians are ambivalent to politics or even sending their children to die in Ukraine. Many are brainwashed sheep. If today milk is white, then it's white. If tomorrow milk is red, then it's red. If nuclear war is discussed as inevitable on television, then nuclear war is inevitable.
It is ironic that you believe that capitulation in Ukraine will solve the issue? You believe Putin will be happy? Will stop on his own? On the contrary, I believe it will accelerate his aggression. The portions of Ukraine being fought over include key natural resources and industry needed to sustain a wider global conflict, to include oil.
![]()
Ask yourself, would you be fine having your child raised under the Russian government? Where the only rule is abeyance absolute power? If so, you're nothing but a slave, my friend.
Hopefully you understand what the Ukrainians are fighting for and why it's important to the World.
Are you an expert on Russia?
Also, Ukraine and Russia are much less different than Ukraine wants the West to think
I happen to agree with “political realists” that Putin’s aggression was caused by the US and NATO flirting with Russia’s neighbors
To me it sounds logical. I think it was more than possible to coexist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WSJ throws in the towel in Ukraine. Spineless neocons lied for 24 months.
https://www.wsj.com/world/russia/its-time-to-end-magical-thinking-about-russias-defeat-f6d0b8de?mod=djemalertNEWS
Joe loses his second war. We need Trump. The only winner with correct instincts.
Thanks for your insights Vlad
The last thing we need is an insurrectionist fraud cult leader serving as lap dog for the world’s number one war criminal …
Calling Putin the number one war criminal is so October 6th.
Yeah he wants us to think that.
Who do you think armed and trained Hamas to employ their trade mark barbarism towards innocent civilians (with help from Iran)? The weapons used October 7 were licensed by Russia and various credible videos of Russian soldiers training Hamas terrorists.
The Number one war criminal wanted to divert the world’s gaze from his illegal and immoral war in Ukraine in order to buy himself more time to continue his reign of terror in Ukraine.
In the most despicable and cynical way possible he incited the latest Israel Gaza conflict while feigning concern for Palestinians. This is also at the expense of his own people as he doubles his military spending while drastically reducing funds for education, health and other domestic needs. .
He is positively gloating about the middle East crisis and not flossing over his illegal
Violent invasion of Ukraine as he thinks the world is not watching any more.
We are watching and won’t forget the evil he has unleashed on so many innocent people .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe it’s time to stop cornering him so that he doesn’t resort to desperate measures
Cornering? Strange. I don't think you understand, but not surprising. For many Americans, what goes on in Russia is a concept that's difficult to understand.
In the time-period of Putin's early career as a KGB spy, the KGB typically rewarded ruthlessness that achieved results. There were no bounds, no rules, nothing off limits. Assassination, blackmail, intimidation - not a concern for the KGB. It was the perfect environment for a black-belt judo scrapper who grew up on the streets of post-war Leningrad.
I believe he is inherently aggressive. For him, anyone who dares to contradict him is a threat. Appeasement of that type of personality also doesn't end well. Like a jackal circling prey, I believe he will relentlessly pick off the weak first and surprise attack the strong who could offer resistance.
As an example, if he steals something, rapes someone, murders someone - his expectation is you stand and watch; maybe even clap and cheer him on. But this also means that the more you appease, the worse it will be. This is why so many Russians are ambivalent to politics or even sending their children to die in Ukraine. Many are brainwashed sheep. If today milk is white, then it's white. If tomorrow milk is red, then it's red. If nuclear war is discussed as inevitable on television, then nuclear war is inevitable.
It is ironic that you believe that capitulation in Ukraine will solve the issue? You believe Putin will be happy? Will stop on his own? On the contrary, I believe it will accelerate his aggression. The portions of Ukraine being fought over include key natural resources and industry needed to sustain a wider global conflict, to include oil.
![]()
Ask yourself, would you be fine having your child raised under the Russian government? Where the only rule is abeyance absolute power? If so, you're nothing but a slave, my friend.
Hopefully you understand what the Ukrainians are fighting for and why it's important to the World.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WSJ throws in the towel in Ukraine. Spineless neocons lied for 24 months.
https://www.wsj.com/world/russia/its-time-to-end-magical-thinking-about-russias-defeat-f6d0b8de?mod=djemalertNEWS
Joe loses his second war. We need Trump. The only winner with correct instincts.
Thanks for your insights Vlad
The last thing we need is an insurrectionist fraud cult leader serving as lap dog for the world’s number one war criminal …
Calling Putin the number one war criminal is so October 6th.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WSJ throws in the towel in Ukraine. Spineless neocons lied for 24 months.
https://www.wsj.com/world/russia/its-time-to-end-magical-thinking-about-russias-defeat-f6d0b8de?mod=djemalertNEWS
Joe loses his second war. We need Trump. The only winner with correct instincts.
Thanks for your insights Vlad
The last thing we need is an insurrectionist fraud cult leader serving as lap dog for the world’s number one war criminal …
Anonymous wrote:WSJ throws in the towel in Ukraine. Spineless neocons lied for 24 months.
https://www.wsj.com/world/russia/its-time-to-end-magical-thinking-about-russias-defeat-f6d0b8de?mod=djemalertNEWS
Joe loses his second war. We need Trump. The only winner with correct instincts.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe it’s time to stop cornering him so that he doesn’t resort to desperate measures