Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice the narrative shift. Megyn Kelly explaining all this away by saying it's 15 year-olds, not 5 year-olds. Shapiro not denying it, just saying MGT is trying to destroy Trump. Bannon saying Trump is "imperfect" but that's okay. They all know it's true and are trying to move the conversation past it.

They seem not to have noticed that many, actual girls were *victims* of all this.

You and I both know that these goons do not care about any of the girls involved. They hate girls.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice the narrative shift. Megyn Kelly explaining all this away by saying it's 15 year-olds, not 5 year-olds. Shapiro not denying it, just saying MGT is trying to destroy Trump. Bannon saying Trump is "imperfect" but that's okay. They all know it's true and are trying to move the conversation past it.

Trial balloons to see what works. Republicans are focus grouping in real time.

Not one reedemable soul in the WH situation room meeting with Trump game planning a response to the release.

The sit room meets were to pressure Boebert and Mace, separately, into withdrawing their signatures on the 218 discharge petition so a vote could be averted. Those must have been horrendously high pressure meetings for these women. They bravely stood their ground. I don't agree with them on anything else, BTW.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anything now revealed in the Epstein files about Trump that could have been used to upend his 2024 campaign would be a stain on the Democratic Party. If they sat on disqualifying information then they are complicit in everything that has happened and will happen during his second term.

These emails have just come out from the Epstein estate, stupid. No politician was sitting on them. They were released immediately. The DOJ has been sitting on the rest of it, but those legally cannot be released unless Congress votes for it and Trump signs the order.

And probably some from Maxwell’s team

Anonymous wrote:Anything now revealed in the Epstein files about Trump that could have been used to upend his 2024 campaign would be a stain on the Democratic Party. If they sat on disqualifying information then they are complicit in everything that has happened and will happen during his second term.

These emails have just come out from the Epstein estate, stupid. No politician was sitting on them. They were released immediately. The DOJ has been sitting on the rest of it, but those legally cannot be released unless Congress votes for it and Trump signs the order.

Anonymous wrote:Notice the narrative shift. Megyn Kelly explaining all this away by saying it's 15 year-olds, not 5 year-olds. Shapiro not denying it, just saying MGT is trying to destroy Trump. Bannon saying Trump is "imperfect" but that's okay. They all know it's true and are trying to move the conversation past it.

The problem with this is that a large cohort of men- yes, a large number- dont think anything is wrong with 15/16. They really dont. They wouldnt be friends with that person but they arent going to turn them in unless its their daughter (or son). And just wait for the whole - they look 18 or they dress 18 or they act 18 or they tricked them with a fake ID or they wanted it for the money or fame or attention.

Its disgusting and it should be called out every single time. They are going to say things like - its an arbitrary legal line or biologically they can have children at that age or whatever moral backsliding they come up with.

Its 18 point blank. 18-25or so is their own cohort. There are power and other dynamics at play for large age gaps. We can opine on all that but anyone who is an adult should not be involved with a child. There is no grey area. And I do look down on anyone over the age of 25- looking at you 40 year old women and men- who have sex with or date men/women under 25. Its not illegal but its not quite right either.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anything now revealed in the Epstein files about Trump that could have been used to upend his 2024 campaign would be a stain on the Democratic Party. If they sat on disqualifying information then they are complicit in everything that has happened and will happen during his second term.

That’s industrial strength copium, right here. Don’t you have a pageant to watch or something?

Stopping an existential threat to American democracy was the battle cry in 2024. Well, we got the existential threat, and it’s real. Any information that would have stopped candidate Trump that Democrats didn’t release makes leadership complicit in our current mess.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Simple question: if there was something so damning about Trump in the files, why hasnt some mole, former FBI agent, former DOJ prosecutor or anyone else teased or leaked it? The former administration had access to these files and presumably dozens of people reviewed them, yet not one peep about anything… (and I can’t stand Trump)

Because ironically the DOJ wasn’t politicized previously. People did not leak for fear of losing their jobs. Also Trump is super litigious and always has been. Also our society really doesn’t care about sex crimes against women. Look at how people have commented on the E Jean Carroll case. Society sh*ts on women/girls who are abused because somehow they think they asked for it.

You would think Comey's daughter who set on these files for 4 years cares? Why did she sh** on women and girls by not prosecuting Trump?

I don’t know, I guess that we will find out more when the full files are released. The important part is that you found a way to blame a woman for your heroes molesting children.

Will they be released? With the 218 signatures on the discharge, the House has to vote. Then the Senate will have to vote and my understanding is it is unlikely to make it through the Senate, is that correct?

It is worse than that.

Trump would have to sign it into law.

Look at how hard he is trying to avoid being the one to squash it.

One could hope that when the votes come, the House and Senate have enough to override a veto. Now getting the AG to actually release the documents is another hurdle.

The vote to release the files should be not just veto proof, but unanimous in both houses. What possible justification could any senator or representative have for opposing it???

Any who do oppose it should be voted out of office and ostracized from polite society.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notice the narrative shift. Megyn Kelly explaining all this away by saying it's 15 year-olds, not 5 year-olds. Shapiro not denying it, just saying MGT is trying to destroy Trump. Bannon saying Trump is "imperfect" but that's okay. They all know it's true and are trying to move the conversation past it.

Trial balloons to see what works. Republicans are focus grouping in real time.

Not one reedemable soul in the WH situation room meeting with Trump game planning a response to the release.

My guess is that we will pick any Dem or perceived Dem adjacent indiv in these emails and pin this all on them - focus on the enablers with such laser focus that the media will follow suit.

Anonymous wrote:Notice the narrative shift. Megyn Kelly explaining all this away by saying it's 15 year-olds, not 5 year-olds. Shapiro not denying it, just saying MGT is trying to destroy Trump. Bannon saying Trump is "imperfect" but that's okay. They all know it's true and are trying to move the conversation past it.

They seem not to have noticed that many, actual girls were *victims* of all this.

Anonymous wrote:Notice the narrative shift. Megyn Kelly explaining all this away by saying it's 15 year-olds, not 5 year-olds. Shapiro not denying it, just saying MGT is trying to destroy Trump. Bannon saying Trump is "imperfect" but that's okay. They all know it's true and are trying to move the conversation past it.

Trial balloons to see what works. Republicans are focus grouping in real time.

Not one reedemable soul in the WH situation room meeting with Trump game planning a response to the release.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WTF? "a sombrero over my head"???
This man is a U.S. Senator?

Trump posted ai videos of Jeffries with a sombrero on his head (and a Mariachi band behind him) to make fun of what he was saying. Kennedy is telling us that he expects to attract Trump's ire for being in favor of release.

God. Thank you. It was crystal clear what he meant by the sombrero comment. Obviously too many people aren’t paying close attention - one reason why Trump continuously gets away with egregious behavior.

I checked out after the jet/poop video.

The sombrero videos were posted by Trump weeks before No Kings in mid-October and the poop video that followed. Just FYI.

The fockery is disorienting. I'm not paying attention anymore.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Simple question: if there was something so damning about Trump in the files, why hasnt some mole, former FBI agent, former DOJ prosecutor or anyone else teased or leaked it? The former administration had access to these files and presumably dozens of people reviewed them, yet not one peep about anything… (and I can’t stand Trump)

Because ironically the DOJ wasn’t politicized previously. People did not leak for fear of losing their jobs. Also Trump is super litigious and always has been. Also our society really doesn’t care about sex crimes against women. Look at how people have commented on the E Jean Carroll case. Society sh*ts on women/girls who are abused because somehow they think they asked for it.

You would think Comey's daughter who set on these files for 4 years cares? Why did she sh** on women and girls by not prosecuting Trump?

I don’t know, I guess that we will find out more when the full files are released. The important part is that you found a way to blame a woman for your heroes molesting children.

Will they be released? With the 218 signatures on the discharge, the House has to vote. Then the Senate will have to vote and my understanding is it is unlikely to make it through the Senate, is that correct?

It is worse than that.

Trump would have to sign it into law.

Look at how hard he is trying to avoid being the one to squash it.

One could hope that when the votes come, the House and Senate have enough to override a veto. Now getting the AG to actually release the documents is another hurdle.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:WTF? "a sombrero over my head"???
This man is a U.S. Senator?

Trump posted ai videos of Jeffries with a sombrero on his head (and a Mariachi band behind him) to make fun of what he was saying. Kennedy is telling us that he expects to attract Trump's ire for being in favor of release.

God. Thank you. It was crystal clear what he meant by the sombrero comment. Obviously too many people aren’t paying close attention - one reason why Trump continuously gets away with egregious behavior.

I checked out after the jet/poop video.

The sombrero videos were posted by Trump weeks before No Kings in mid-October and the poop video that followed. Just FYI.

Anonymous wrote:Notice the narrative shift. Megyn Kelly explaining all this away by saying it's 15 year-olds, not 5 year-olds. Shapiro not denying it, just saying MGT is trying to destroy Trump. Bannon saying Trump is "imperfect" but that's okay. They all know it's true and are trying to move the conversation past it.

Absolute garbage people.

Anonymous wrote:WTF? "a sombrero over my head"???
This man is a U.S. Senator?

Kennedy is very bright and didn't always talk in such a way (accent and substance). It's on purpose.

And he was a Democrat 21 years ago. Maybe even more recently than that.