Anonymous
09/14/2025 05:44
Subject: Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only photos of the supposed ‘trans’ roommate are of a guy wearing a onesie. Is this all they have?
I know! when will the police and fbi release everything to the public? Monday?
This article says that FBI officials confirmed that Robinson is in a romantic relationship with his transsexual partner https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trans-roommate-tyler-james-robinson-213501931.html
The same FBI that redacted Trumps name from the Epstein files?
Anonymous
09/14/2025 04:55
Subject: Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only photos of the supposed ‘trans’ roommate are of a guy wearing a onesie. Is this all they have?
I know! when will the police and fbi release everything to the public? Monday?
This article says that FBI officials confirmed that Robinson is in a romantic relationship with his transsexual partner https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trans-roommate-tyler-james-robinson-213501931.html
The Dallas Express is not a real newspaper.
It a right wing rag.
Anonymous
09/14/2025 04:32
Subject: Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only photos of the supposed ‘trans’ roommate are of a guy wearing a onesie. Is this all they have?
I know! when will the police and fbi release everything to the public? Monday?
This article says that FBI officials confirmed that Robinson is in a romantic relationship with his transsexual partner https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trans-roommate-tyler-james-robinson-213501931.html
I don’t trust yahoo or the fbi
Anonymous
09/14/2025 02:51
Subject: Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University
Robinson grew up in a largely conservative Mormon family, though he was not registered with either major political party. Robinson also appeared to have become infatuated with the far left in recent years, according to the authorities.
“It’s very clear to us and to the investigators that this was a person who was deeply indoctrinated with leftist ideology,” Utah Gov. Spencer Cox told The Wall Street Journal in an interview published Friday.
Cox also revealed in the interview that a recent family dinner showed Robinson’s newfound beliefs. Robinson and a relative argued over Kirk’s viewpoints and how each “didn’t like” the 31-year-old conservative activist.
Robinsonalso discussed with his roommate how he allegedly etched messages onto bullets.
“It’s very clear to us and to the investigators that this was a person who was deeply indoctrinated with leftist ideology,” Utah Gov. Spencer Cox told The Wall Street Journal in an interview published Friday.
Cox also revealed in the interview that a recent family dinner showed Robinson’s newfound beliefs. Robinson and a relative argued over Kirk’s viewpoints and how each “didn’t like” the 31-year-old conservative activist.
Robinsonalso discussed with his roommate how he allegedly etched messages onto bullets.
Anonymous
09/14/2025 02:22
Subject: Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University
Dunno. Don’t they both have willies?
Anonymous
09/14/2025 02:21
Subject: Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University
What’s transsexual mean?
Anonymous
09/14/2025 02:21
Subject: Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s so weird but also so predictable that I. Two pages, DCUM goes from “there is no shred of evidence he was trans” to “who cares?”
The FBI has confirmed the partner of the killer is a male to female and they lived together romantically. The partner is cooperating with the FBI and has confirmed this herself.
It certainly explains motive and settles the “actually he was a far right Nazi” question. Can we move on now and accept he was radicalized to the left?
Not touching the furry thing other than that it explains the engravings somewhat. Beyond that, I don’t think it is relevant.
Having a transgender partner doesn’t explain motive. All it establishes is a personal detail about the killer’s life, not why the attack happened. A motive requires evidence that the act was driven by a specific belief system, grievance, or goal. Saying “he dated a trans woman, therefore he was radicalized to the left” is a logical leap — it’s like saying someone who dates a Christian must be motivated by Christianity. Until there’s actual proof, like writings, statements, or affiliations tying the violence to left-wing ideology, the partner’s gender identity doesn’t settle anything about motive.
Missing the forest for the trees…we need gun control, mental health resources, empathy.
Charlie Kirk didn’t think highly of empathy.
Well Charlie would still be alive today playing with his babies if we focused more on the above.
+1
You reap what you sow. And the "reaping" isn't always accompanied by good people or a socially palatable method. Reaping doesn't mean deserving, it means natural, unsurprising consequence, note the distinction.
Not sure what country or time period you live in but in NO ONE’s law book, govt, or faith is it “natural and unsurprising” to unilaterally decide shoot someone down for what they have said in public forums. Or private ones.
That’s anarchy, lawlessness, chaos, not to mention unethical, illegal and immoral in most religions and societies.
— Note the distinction of your illogic and falsities. And zero understanding of due process.
You are missing the point. I was not saying violence is legal, moral, or justified. I was saying it can be a predictable consequence. “Reaping what you sow” in that context means unsurprising outcome, not rightful punishment. Condemning the act as illegal or immoral is valid, but it does not address the claim of inevitability.
Nope. Shooting down a politician or activist is not a “predictable consequence” nor “unsurprising outcome” nor “inevitability” of them being a vocal politician or activist.
Get professional help Pp.
In a country where uncivilized politicians enact wil wild West style gun laws, shooting down a politician is a predictable consequence , indeed. Facts don't care about your fragile and hypocritical feelings .
Speaking of facts, what you cited - shooting down a politician - is indeed extremely rare in America and most countries.
Plus Charlie Kirk was quite civilized when he spoke. That was his model- or else it wouldn’t work, watch the shows.
Thanks for playing, better luck next time!
In one episode of his podcast, Kirk suggested that children should be forced to watch Trump’s political opponents beheaded live on television. With sponsorship by Coca-Cola.
That doesn’t sound very civilized.
Context and link?
Look it up yourself. If you don't find the poster credible in context that is your problem.
Dude, who would? You just wrote 25-30 words.
How dumb do you think people are?
Information has been provided. Up to you what you do with it.
Correct, after multiple posters called out your petty nonresponses, you finally posted a transcript link.
We’ll watch it full in due course and revert back with our thoughts.
No, the request for sources is a petty rhetorical technique to dismiss the poster. And no, you are not going to watch the video because that was never the point.
What you might do is find an excuse to dismiss it outright, to further dismiss the credibility of the poster.
Excuse me? Who wouldn’t want to look at the source material and think for themselves on the matter?
Why would anyone just read a stranger’s opinion tweet and run with it?
Plus half of the country is illiterate.
Funny how nobody’s commented on what CK said, in his own words, on the transcript. They’re just attacking the messenger.
Didn’t they say they’d read it over and revert back? Maybe they have a life or are having sex in a Saturday night. Unlike us.
It takes all of thirty seconds to read. I read it. My reaction: PP was correct that in this segment of the podcast, Kirk was advocating for making children watch televised executions. And that is a horrifying opinion.
There, that wasn’t so hard.
Was that the deterrent point one?
Anonymous
09/14/2025 02:20
Subject: Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only photos of the supposed ‘trans’ roommate are of a guy wearing a onesie. Is this all they have?
I know! when will the police and fbi release everything to the public? Monday?
This article says that FBI officials confirmed that Robinson is in a romantic relationship with his transsexual partner https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trans-roommate-tyler-james-robinson-213501931.html
Anonymous
09/14/2025 02:20
Subject: Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only photos of the supposed ‘trans’ roommate are of a guy wearing a onesie. Is this all they have?
I know! when will the police and fbi release everything to the public? Monday? [/quote
This article says that it was confirmed by the FBI officials that are interviewing his transsexual partner
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trans-roommate-tyler-james-robinson-213501931.html
Anonymous
09/14/2025 02:18
Subject: Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University
Anonymous wrote:The only photos of the supposed ‘trans’ roommate are of a guy wearing a onesie. Is this all they have?
I know! when will the police and fbi release everything to the public? Monday?
Anonymous
09/14/2025 02:15
Subject: Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University
Trans and gay don’t necessarily equate to left wing. The alt right is full of gay/trans people - think Milo Yiannopolous, Caitlyn Jenner, Peter Thiel, the French guy who coined the Great Replacement theory.
Anonymous
09/14/2025 02:14
Subject: Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:🚨 BREAKING: The FBI and state agencies have launched investigations into multiple LEFTIST groups in Utah for possible advanced knowledge of the Charlie Kirk assassination, per Axios
They’re also probing whether or not these groups provided material support after the kiIIing
At least one group deactivated their social media pages soon after the shot was taken.
Well, well, well…looks like the governor scared up some new leads after Trump called him. I expect the shooter to have a very Epstein jail experience.
You mean for the social media groups who knew ahead of time about the murder or provided on the ground help or money? If they were accomplices?
Yes they will be charged conspirators and serve time.
Anonymous
09/14/2025 01:45
Subject: Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s so weird but also so predictable that I. Two pages, DCUM goes from “there is no shred of evidence he was trans” to “who cares?”
The FBI has confirmed the partner of the killer is a male to female and they lived together romantically. The partner is cooperating with the FBI and has confirmed this herself.
It certainly explains motive and settles the “actually he was a far right Nazi” question. Can we move on now and accept he was radicalized to the left?
Not touching the furry thing other than that it explains the engravings somewhat. Beyond that, I don’t think it is relevant.
Having a transgender partner doesn’t explain motive. All it establishes is a personal detail about the killer’s life, not why the attack happened. A motive requires evidence that the act was driven by a specific belief system, grievance, or goal. Saying “he dated a trans woman, therefore he was radicalized to the left” is a logical leap — it’s like saying someone who dates a Christian must be motivated by Christianity. Until there’s actual proof, like writings, statements, or affiliations tying the violence to left-wing ideology, the partner’s gender identity doesn’t settle anything about motive.
Missing the forest for the trees…we need gun control, mental health resources, empathy.
Charlie Kirk didn’t think highly of empathy.
Well Charlie would still be alive today playing with his babies if we focused more on the above.
+1
You reap what you sow. And the "reaping" isn't always accompanied by good people or a socially palatable method. Reaping doesn't mean deserving, it means natural, unsurprising consequence, note the distinction.
Not sure what country or time period you live in but in NO ONE’s law book, govt, or faith is it “natural and unsurprising” to unilaterally decide shoot someone down for what they have said in public forums. Or private ones.
That’s anarchy, lawlessness, chaos, not to mention unethical, illegal and immoral in most religions and societies.
— Note the distinction of your illogic and falsities. And zero understanding of due process.
You are missing the point. I was not saying violence is legal, moral, or justified. I was saying it can be a predictable consequence. “Reaping what you sow” in that context means unsurprising outcome, not rightful punishment. Condemning the act as illegal or immoral is valid, but it does not address the claim of inevitability.
Nope. Shooting down a politician or activist is not a “predictable consequence” nor “unsurprising outcome” nor “inevitability” of them being a vocal politician or activist.
Get professional help Pp.
In a country where uncivilized politicians enact wil wild West style gun laws, shooting down a politician is a predictable consequence , indeed. Facts don't care about your fragile and hypocritical feelings .
Speaking of facts, what you cited - shooting down a politician - is indeed extremely rare in America and most countries.
Plus Charlie Kirk was quite civilized when he spoke. That was his model- or else it wouldn’t work, watch the shows.
Thanks for playing, better luck next time!
In one episode of his podcast, Kirk suggested that children should be forced to watch Trump’s political opponents beheaded live on television. With sponsorship by Coca-Cola.
That doesn’t sound very civilized.
Context and link?
Look it up yourself. If you don't find the poster credible in context that is your problem.
Dude, who would? You just wrote 25-30 words.
How dumb do you think people are?
Information has been provided. Up to you what you do with it.
Correct, after multiple posters called out your petty nonresponses, you finally posted a transcript link.
We’ll watch it full in due course and revert back with our thoughts.
No, the request for sources is a petty rhetorical technique to dismiss the poster. And no, you are not going to watch the video because that was never the point.
What you might do is find an excuse to dismiss it outright, to further dismiss the credibility of the poster.
Excuse me? Who wouldn’t want to look at the source material and think for themselves on the matter?
Why would anyone just read a stranger’s opinion tweet and run with it?
Plus half of the country is illiterate.
Funny how nobody’s commented on what CK said, in his own words, on the transcript. They’re just attacking the messenger.
Didn’t they say they’d read it over and revert back? Maybe they have a life or are having sex in a Saturday night. Unlike us.
It takes all of thirty seconds to read. I read it. My reaction: PP was correct that in this segment of the podcast, Kirk was advocating for making children watch televised executions. And that is a horrifying opinion.
There, that wasn’t so hard.
Anonymous
09/14/2025 01:38
Subject: Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University
Lance Twiggs has a deep voice, doesn’t appear to be female at all, wears men’s clothing. He is not trans.
Anonymous
09/14/2025 01:36
Subject: Re:Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University
Gasp, he's wearing an animal onesie
1/4 of the kids at my child's school must have been trans on pajama day
1/4 of the kids at my child's school must have been trans on pajama day