Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We double redshirted my son. We did the research and it showed holding back a year was advantageous. So we thought if one year is good two must be better.
And we wonder why New York had deemed its former gifted and talented program racist? When privileged people are stacking the deck so that an already disadvantaged poor block kid has to compete with someone two years older than them for a converted spot in an elite school, what chance have they got?
You have no ability to recognize sarcasm, do you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We double redshirted my son. We did the research and it showed holding back a year was advantageous. So we thought if one year is good two must be better.
And we wonder why New York had deemed its former gifted and talented program racist? When privileged people are stacking the deck so that an already disadvantaged poor block kid has to compete with someone two years older than them for a converted spot in an elite school, what chance have they got?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We double redshirted my son. We did the research and it showed holding back a year was advantageous. So we thought if one year is good two must be better.
And we wonder why New York had deemed its former gifted and talented program racist? When privileged people are stacking the deck so that an already disadvantaged poor block kid has to compete with someone two years older than them for a converted spot in an elite school, what chance have they got?
Anonymous wrote:We double redshirted my son. We did the research and it showed holding back a year was advantageous. So we thought if one year is good two must be better.
Anonymous wrote:I have a fall son who just started preschool. Unsure what we will do. Not every study shows that redshirting is advantageous - some studies show that young birthdays do better academically then the older class birthdays. I will take cues from his preschool and the kindergarten he will attend. I don’t want to redshirt him and have him be bored, either. He’s in 3s now and I see a big difference between him and kids a year younger.
Anonymous wrote:We green-shirted. My kid is doing very well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know some people refuse to believe it, but the older kids end up doing better in school. It's not surprising that people who can swing redshirting do it.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/08/18/544483397/oldest-kids-in-class-do-better-even-through-college
Why has the subject of pressure not come up once in regards to this? What you say is true. Since older kids usually do better, this means that if a kid is redshirted, they'll be expected to excel. So if, for some weird reason, an older kid does worse, it'll be a lot more embarrassing for them than had they been on the young end. It's always embarrassing to perform poorly, but it's still much less embarrassing to perform poorly when you were expected to excel than it is to perform poorly when you were expected to perform poorly. Conversely, it's much more impressive to excel when you were expected to perform poorly than it is to excel when you were expected to excel. I just think parents should consider how much pressure their kid would be under if they redshirted. There's no room to exceed expectations in school when you're the oldest.
I remember all the times job interviewers asked when my birthday was so they could determine if my success was due to my young age and then reward me accordingly. Oh wait, that never happened. How is it that nobody is impressed by my success because I was one of the younger kids to graduate from my class? How do people impress people when their birthday and age are unknown? Besides ones own parents, who are the kids trying to impress? I have the same expectations of all my kids regardless of their birthdays.
It's not about impressing employers or colleges. It's about being able to find comfort within yourself in knowing that your failures are not to you being stupid. You may not be able to impress anyone, but you can still yourself, "I'm not stupid, just younger." An older kid who did poorly can't tell themselves that and will have to live with the knowledge that they may really be stupid.
But I have 3 kids and none has ever said anything remotely like "Guess I aced that spelling test because I'm the oldest in class." And when they fail they don't think "well, I'm young, so guess I wasn't expected to do well anyway" this is not at all how the kids I know think so your input is not resonating with me at all since there is no pressure one way or the other with respect to their age. I expect them all to do their best, there is no minimizing for being old nor is there any excuse for being young. If they failed an exam (hypothetically) it would be because they didn't study enough. Pretty simple. And there's plenty of room to exceed expectations, there is never a ceiling, weirdo!Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know some people refuse to believe it, but the older kids end up doing better in school. It's not surprising that people who can swing redshirting do it.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/08/18/544483397/oldest-kids-in-class-do-better-even-through-college
Why has the subject of pressure not come up once in regards to this? What you say is true. Since older kids usually do better, this means that if a kid is redshirted, they'll be expected to excel. So if, for some weird reason, an older kid does worse, it'll be a lot more embarrassing for them than had they been on the young end. It's always embarrassing to perform poorly, but it's still much less embarrassing to perform poorly when you were expected to excel than it is to perform poorly when you were expected to perform poorly. Conversely, it's much more impressive to excel when you were expected to perform poorly than it is to excel when you were expected to excel. I just think parents should consider how much pressure their kid would be under if they redshirted. There's no room to exceed expectations in school when you're the oldest.
I remember all the times job interviewers asked when my birthday was so they could determine if my success was due to my young age and then reward me accordingly. Oh wait, that never happened. How is it that nobody is impressed by my success because I was one of the younger kids to graduate from my class? How do people impress people when their birthday and age are unknown? Besides ones own parents, who are the kids trying to impress? I have the same expectations of all my kids regardless of their birthdays.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know some people refuse to believe it, but the older kids end up doing better in school. It's not surprising that people who can swing redshirting do it.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/08/18/544483397/oldest-kids-in-class-do-better-even-through-college
Why has the subject of pressure not come up once in regards to this? What you say is true. Since older kids usually do better, this means that if a kid is redshirted, they'll be expected to excel. So if, for some weird reason, an older kid does worse, it'll be a lot more embarrassing for them than had they been on the young end. It's always embarrassing to perform poorly, but it's still much less embarrassing to perform poorly when you were expected to excel than it is to perform poorly when you were expected to perform poorly. Conversely, it's much more impressive to excel when you were expected to perform poorly than it is to excel when you were expected to excel. I just think parents should consider how much pressure their kid would be under if they redshirted. There's no room to exceed expectations in school when you're the oldest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know some people refuse to believe it, but the older kids end up doing better in school. It's not surprising that people who can swing redshirting do it.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/08/18/544483397/oldest-kids-in-class-do-better-even-through-college
Why has the subject of pressure not come up once in regards to this? What you say is true. Since older kids usually do better, this means that if a kid is redshirted, they'll be expected to excel. So if, for some weird reason, an older kid does worse, it'll be a lot more embarrassing for them than had they been on the young end. It's always embarrassing to perform poorly, but it's still much less embarrassing to perform poorly when you were expected to excel than it is to perform poorly when you were expected to perform poorly. Conversely, it's much more impressive to excel when you were expected to perform poorly than it is to excel when you were expected to excel. I just think parents should consider how much pressure their kid would be under if they redshirted. There's no room to exceed expectations in school when you're the oldest.