Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have been following this thread. Is it legal to hire an American to watch your children but pay less than minimum wage? If you let them live in your in law suite or finished basement and provided food and a car?
There just seems like nothing between an AP and a nanny, which is out of reach for many.
Yes, because in that scenario you would be deducting the cost of room, board, and transportation- that’s thousands of dollars per year.
No, DoL allows deduction of $77/wk max: $35 for room. Kamala Harris Bill is pending that should put stop
to abuses. https://www.harris.senate.gov/news/press-releases/harris-jayapal-announce-domestic-workers-bill-of-rights
A live-in nanny should receive the same rate of pay you would consider for a live-out caregiver. The fact that they receive room and board shouldn’t lessen their pay.
According to the International Nanny Association’s 2017 Salary and Benefits Survey, the national average hourly rate for a full-time nanny is $19.14/hour. There wasn’t much difference in pay rate for live-in and live-out employees.
Live-in nannies are considered hourly workers and need to be paid the highest applicable minimum wage of the federal, state, and local rates.
As mentioned, they are paid for all hours they’re on duty and “on call.” If your live-in nanny needs to be at your home and isn’t free to leave, then they need to be paid for those hours.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s admirable. To my surprise, I discovered that this would be our first ever domestic workers bill of rights. Once it’s hopefully passed, we need to make sure states don’t enforce exemptions or exclude au pairs (as in MD/VA) and live in nannies. MA is the gold standard and DC is progressive enough to head straight there. That still leaves the issue of affordable childcare more broadly and with so many Americans requiring good work, one would think we could up our investment in government-sponsored quality childcare or some type of PPP.
more details here:
https://www.harris.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/ONE%20PAGER%20National%20Domestic%20Workers%20Bill%20of%20Rights.pdf
https://www.harris.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Domestic%20Workers%20Bill%20of%20Rights%20Summary.pdf[/quote
Thank you, this is the minimum!
NY is more progressive than DC - and carves-out the AP program.
Anonymous wrote:That’s admirable. To my surprise, I discovered that this would be our first ever domestic workers bill of rights. Once it’s hopefully passed, we need to make sure states don’t enforce exemptions or exclude au pairs (as in MD/VA) and live in nannies. MA is the gold standard and DC is progressive enough to head straight there. That still leaves the issue of affordable childcare more broadly and with so many Americans requiring good work, one would think we could up our investment in government-sponsored quality childcare or some type of PPP.
more details here:
https://www.harris.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/ONE%20PAGER%20National%20Domestic%20Workers%20Bill%20of%20Rights.pdf
https://www.harris.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Domestic%20Workers%20Bill%20of%20Rights%20Summary.pdf[/quote
Thank you, this is the minimum!
Anonymous wrote:I will offer minimum wage, happily, to the angel who cares for our children. We have been basically paying that anyway during the pandemic, so let's make it official and be on the up-and-up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Activists scored a victory in June when the Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to a ruling that requires au pairs in Massachusetts to be paid the state’s minimum wage of $12.75 an hour. That thrilled pressure groups like the National Domestic Workers Alliance, which are now multiplying suits against the programme. Expect fireworks.
It will be a big loss of the program shuts down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have been following this thread. Is it legal to hire an American to watch your children but pay less than minimum wage? If you let them live in your in law suite or finished basement and provided food and a car?
There just seems like nothing between an AP and a nanny, which is out of reach for many.
Yes, because in that scenario you would be deducting the cost of room, board, and transportation- that’s thousands of dollars per year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Activists scored a victory in June when the Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to a ruling that requires au pairs in Massachusetts to be paid the state’s minimum wage of $12.75 an hour. That thrilled pressure groups like the National Domestic Workers Alliance, which are now multiplying suits against the programme. Expect fireworks.
It will be a big loss of the program shuts down.
Anonymous wrote:I have been following this thread. Is it legal to hire an American to watch your children but pay less than minimum wage? If you let them live in your in law suite or finished basement and provided food and a car?
There just seems like nothing between an AP and a nanny, which is out of reach for many.
Anonymous wrote:Activists scored a victory in June when the Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to a ruling that requires au pairs in Massachusetts to be paid the state’s minimum wage of $12.75 an hour. That thrilled pressure groups like the National Domestic Workers Alliance, which are now multiplying suits against the programme. Expect fireworks.