Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:”People are very opinionated about my bump. I choose to cradle my bump because it’s MINE. I’ve waited for this VERY short moment for YEARS. I have only months to enjoy this phase in my life, so I will touch my bump and love my bump as often as I choose” - Khloe Kardashian

Personally I think Meghan thought like many successful women her age who were unmarried that she wouldn’t have children. Now she’s not only having children but with a man she absolutely adores - it must feel like a dream. So like Khloe she savors it. Who cares what the rest of you think?

Meghan never thought she'd grow up, be married, and have babies some day? For real? This might be the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. She was already married and dumped that guy like yesterday's trash. Having a baby at 37 is no great feat. She isn't the first and won't be the last to have a baby at that age. I'd rather watch a woman do great things in spite of being pregnant, not because of it. We have enough people like that already. They are not role models.

Woman here - early 30s. Millionaire and business owner. I’ve never been interested in kids. Ever. And I certainly wouldn’t have any in anything less than a marriage with someone I loved. So you can count me in as a woman who never dreamed of ‘having babies one day’. Surprise - not all women think that’s the most they can do with their lives.

I'm the PP above your comment and I can't tell if you agree or disagree with me. But just to clarify, I'm not saying its everyone's dream to have kids. But the OP seems to think its some fantasy come true that that MM got married (for the 2nd time) and got pregnant. Something just about any woman can achieve it she wants to (don't come at me about infertility). And heck, you don't even need a man to do it. MM would have been in a position to have a kid with or without a man. The "feeling like a dream" just feels so over the top for such an ordinary thing as being pregnant.

For some women the desire to have children is a toss-up - it’s nice if we do but it’s not the end of the world if we don’t. For women like myself, I can’t say MM is like me though, I’ll take the ‘nice’ of having children but only under the optimal circumstances. I’m certainly not desperate enough to have them alone or with a schlump of a partner. The only reason I say dream - she has chosen to have her children under optimal circumstances. Not every woman can achieve that. KM did as well. If she loved kids just for themselves she could have started having William’s bastards at the age of 24 and Meghan would have had her kids with her first husband.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:”People are very opinionated about my bump. I choose to cradle my bump because it’s MINE. I’ve waited for this VERY short moment for YEARS. I have only months to enjoy this phase in my life, so I will touch my bump and love my bump as often as I choose” - Khloe Kardashian

Personally I think Meghan thought like many successful women her age who were unmarried that she wouldn’t have children. Now she’s not only having children but with a man she absolutely adores - it must feel like a dream. So like Khloe she savors it. Who cares what the rest of you think?

Meghan never thought she'd grow up, be married, and have babies some day? For real? This might be the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. She was already married and dumped that guy like yesterday's trash. Having a baby at 37 is no great feat. She isn't the first and won't be the last to have a baby at that age. I'd rather watch a woman do great things in spite of being pregnant, not because of it. We have enough people like that already. They are not role models.

Woman here - early 30s. Millionaire and business owner. I’ve never been interested in kids. Ever. And I certainly wouldn’t have any in anything less than a marriage with someone I loved. So you can count me in as a woman who never dreamed of ‘having babies one day’. Surprise - not all women think that’s the most they can do with their lives.

I'm the PP above your comment and I can't tell if you agree or disagree with me. But just to clarify, I'm not saying its everyone's dream to have kids. But the OP seems to think its some fantasy come true that that MM got married (for the 2nd time) and got pregnant. Something just about any woman can achieve it she wants to (don't come at me about infertility). And heck, you don't even need a man to do it. MM would have been in a position to have a kid with or without a man. The "feeling like a dream" just feels so over the top for such an ordinary thing as being pregnant.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:”People are very opinionated about my bump. I choose to cradle my bump because it’s MINE. I’ve waited for this VERY short moment for YEARS. I have only months to enjoy this phase in my life, so I will touch my bump and love my bump as often as I choose” - Khloe Kardashian

Personally I think Meghan thought like many successful women her age who were unmarried that she wouldn’t have children. Now she’s not only having children but with a man she absolutely adores - it must feel like a dream. So like Khloe she savors it. Who cares what the rest of you think?

Meghan never thought she'd grow up, be married, and have babies some day? For real? This might be the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. She was already married and dumped that guy like yesterday's trash. Having a baby at 37 is no great feat. She isn't the first and won't be the last to have a baby at that age. I'd rather watch a woman do great things in spite of being pregnant, not because of it. We have enough people like that already. They are not role models.

Woman here - early 30s. Millionaire and business owner. I’ve never been interested in kids. Ever. And I certainly wouldn’t have any in anything less than a marriage with someone I loved. So you can count me in as a woman who never dreamed of ‘having babies one day’. Surprise - not all women think that’s the most they can do with their lives.

Anonymous wrote:”People are very opinionated about my bump. I choose to cradle my bump because it’s MINE. I’ve waited for this VERY short moment for YEARS. I have only months to enjoy this phase in my life, so I will touch my bump and love my bump as often as I choose” - Khloe Kardashian

Personally I think Meghan thought like many successful women her age who were unmarried that she wouldn’t have children. Now she’s not only having children but with a man she absolutely adores - it must feel like a dream. So like Khloe she savors it. Who cares what the rest of you think?

Meghan never thought she'd grow up, be married, and have babies some day? For real? This might be the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. She was already married and dumped that guy like yesterday's trash. Having a baby at 37 is no great feat. She isn't the first and won't be the last to have a baby at that age. I'd rather watch a woman do great things in spite of being pregnant, not because of it. We have enough people like that already. They are not role models.

”People are very opinionated about my bump. I choose to cradle my bump because it’s MINE. I’ve waited for this VERY short moment for YEARS. I have only months to enjoy this phase in my life, so I will touch my bump and love my bump as often as I choose” - Khloe Kardashian

Personally I think Meghan thought like many successful women her age who were unmarried that she wouldn’t have children. Now she’s not only having children but with a man she absolutely adores - it must feel like a dream. So like Khloe she savors it. Who cares what the rest of you think?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Diana would have been mortified with Her son marrying Megan. She is constantly promoting herself and manipulating things to get herself front and center. Plus her lack of a good upbringing, the cultural differences, and age/divorce

Oh go take a nap. You obviously haven’t seen Lady Di’s extensive interviews on every topic from her humanitarian causes to her failing marriage. She was not shy about using the media.

Don’t tell me to take a nap! So rude. I am allowed to have my opinion which I believe is shared with many people. Didn’t you learn any manners?

DP. In my opinion it's far more ill-mannered to speculate so rudely on what someone's deceased mother would do, particularly when that speculation is so rude in of itself.

As for your opinion being shared with others, that doesn't make it magically polite. It's still uncouth.

I’m not sure why you must pick on my post. I’ve done nothing to you and you continue to insult me. You obviously weren’t brought up properly

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Diana would have been mortified with Her son marrying Megan. She is constantly promoting herself and manipulating things to get herself front and center. Plus her lack of a good upbringing, the cultural differences, and age/divorce

Oh go take a nap. You obviously haven’t seen Lady Di’s extensive interviews on every topic from her humanitarian causes to her failing marriage. She was not shy about using the media.

Don’t tell me to take a nap! So rude. I am allowed to have my opinion which I believe is shared with many people. Didn’t you learn any manners?

DP. In my opinion it's far more ill-mannered to speculate so rudely on what someone's deceased mother would do, particularly when that speculation is so rude in of itself.

As for your opinion being shared with others, that doesn't make it magically polite. It's still uncouth.

News flash: everybody in the family hates Andrew. Kate and Wm. are polite and well liked. Meghan is a disaster who will either learn to chill or crash and burn.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where was all this SN speculation about Kate's recent pregnancy? After all she's just 5 months younger than Meghan. Does Prince Louis have special needs? Maybe that's the reason he hasn't been seen as much as George and Charlotte were at his age.

Does that sound ridiculous? Yes of course it does and so does all of this nasty speculation in regards to MM's baby. Some of you truly need help.

Psssst we are talking aboit twins vs singletons. Keep up!

PP has a point - why HAS he been kept so secluded. With a geriatric mother perhaps there’s something wrong with him?

Mothers on here are always asking is 43 too old to have a baby? So, no I don't think 36 is geriatric! Unless you call the dad that too you are very sexist! Also, I don't remember them releasing too many pictures of George or Charlotte.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Diana would have been mortified with Her son marrying Megan. She is constantly promoting herself and manipulating things to get herself front and center. Plus her lack of a good upbringing, the cultural differences, and age/divorce

Oh go take a nap. You obviously haven’t seen Lady Di’s extensive interviews on every topic from her humanitarian causes to her failing marriage. She was not shy about using the media.

Don’t tell me to take a nap! So rude. I am allowed to have my opinion which I believe is shared with many people. Didn’t you learn any manners?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the Cambridges are definitely being informed about their waning popularity and are definitely stepping it up.

https://www.eonline.com/news/992994/kate-middleton-looks-festive-in-plaid-for-military-christmas-party-with-prince-william

The royal events calendar is set months if not years in advance. Do you think they got together a few nights ago and threw together this event because of an article in the Daily Mail?

"William, let's have a Christmas Party for the military tomorrow so that people will think we are nice and we'll be popular." "Great idea, Kate."

This is absurd.

+1
Exactly this. Why do you think Camilla missed Eugenie's wedding?

Actually William and Harry just finalized their joint appearances for 2019 - this month. Their main events are set out early and the rest of the calendar populated in. It’s the Queen who really has a calendar which never changes. But Camilla? She missed that wedding because she hates Andrew full-stop. Her engagements that day even wondered why she didn’t re-schedule on them with more than half a yesr’s notice.

I’m afraid I don’t follow. Assuming Camilla hates Andrew, why miss his daughter’s wedding as opposed to another event where she has to spend time with him?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the Cambridges are definitely being informed about their waning popularity and are definitely stepping it up.

https://www.eonline.com/news/992994/kate-middleton-looks-festive-in-plaid-for-military-christmas-party-with-prince-william

The royal events calendar is set months if not years in advance. Do you think they got together a few nights ago and threw together this event because of an article in the Daily Mail?

"William, let's have a Christmas Party for the military tomorrow so that people will think we are nice and we'll be popular." "Great idea, Kate."

This is absurd.

+1
Exactly this. Why do you think Camilla missed Eugenie's wedding?

Actually William and Harry just finalized their joint appearances for 2019 - this month. Their main events are set out early and the rest of the calendar populated in. It’s the Queen who really has a calendar which never changes. But Camilla? She missed that wedding because she hates Andrew full-stop. Her engagements that day even wondered why she didn’t re-schedule on them with more than half a yesr’s notice.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the Cambridges are definitely being informed about their waning popularity and are definitely stepping it up.

https://www.eonline.com/news/992994/kate-middleton-looks-festive-in-plaid-for-military-christmas-party-with-prince-william

The royal events calendar is set months if not years in advance. Do you think they got together a few nights ago and threw together this event because of an article in the Daily Mail?

"William, let's have a Christmas Party for the military tomorrow so that people will think we are nice and we'll be popular." "Great idea, Kate."

This is absurd.

+1
Exactly this. Why do you think Camilla missed Eugenie's wedding?

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the Cambridges are definitely being informed about their waning popularity and are definitely stepping it up.

https://www.eonline.com/news/992994/kate-middleton-looks-festive-in-plaid-for-military-christmas-party-with-prince-william

The royal events calendar is set months if not years in advance. Do you think they got together a few nights ago and threw together this event because of an article in the Daily Mail?

"William, let's have a Christmas Party for the military tomorrow so that people will think we are nice and we'll be popular." "Great idea, Kate."

This is absurd.