Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pro- and anti- Washington Spirit crazy trainers on this board have convinced me that staying for girls DA in Arlington was probably DDs best soccer decision to date!
What formation does Arlington use? If there is no U16 official DA team, what is Arlington's plans for its 04s?
This has also been covered waaaaaay back. The likely plan for Arlington DA is the age groups will be added as the 04’s progress. The concern was that their 03 on up age groups may have been to thin to support a competitive DA. This allows Arlington to grow and scale the program properly.
Sorry; new to the thread.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pro- and anti- Washington Spirit crazy trainers on this board have convinced me that staying for girls DA in Arlington was probably DDs best soccer decision to date!
What formation does Arlington use? If there is no U16 official DA team, what is Arlington's plans for its 04s?
This has also been covered waaaaaay back. The likely plan for Arlington DA is the age groups will be added as the 04’s progress. The concern was that their 03 on up age groups may have been to thin to support a competitive DA. This allows Arlington to grow and scale the program properly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pro- and anti- Washington Spirit crazy trainers on this board have convinced me that staying for girls DA in Arlington was probably DDs best soccer decision to date!
What formation does Arlington use? If there is no U16 official DA team, what is Arlington's plans for its 04s?
Anonymous wrote:I wish these local DA clubs would post videos of games. I have looked on YouTube but only see a few games from last year. For me the best way to see how my DD potentially compares and could play on these teams would be to see games.
Anonymous wrote:I wish these local DA clubs would post videos of games. I have looked on YouTube but only see a few games from last year. For me the best way to see how my DD potentially compares and could play on these teams would be to see games.
Anonymous wrote:The pro- and anti- Washington Spirit crazy trainers on this board have convinced me that staying for girls DA in Arlington was probably DDs best soccer decision to date!
Anonymous wrote:The pro- and anti- Washington Spirit crazy trainers on this board have convinced me that staying for girls DA in Arlington was probably DDs best soccer decision to date!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP here. I have 10,000 as well and reading this just like many other 07 and 08 parents. You read, we all read, it influences things FBOW. That is why the VYSA pubs to the clubs talk so much about social media. I wouldn't spend 10,000 or 1,000 on an Amazon product that even had a well-written, credible negative review. Know many parents who rely on anonymous Amazon reviews, so I wouldn't downplay the value of DCUM. Jeff will tell you otherwise too!
Gotcha, so you’re saying that an organization or individual can start an anonymous Internet “feedback” strategy that trashes a competitor and you’ll believe it, because, duh, the Internet is always right.
Sounds like pure genius right there. In the words of PT Barnum, there’s a sucker born every minute.
The PP was correct about you. You just put down and criticize the posters personally.
New poster here. Actually, the PP made a valid point on not blindly trusting anonymous comments. There has been personal attacks in both directions in this train wreck of a thread.
I agree with the majority here that this feedback is not credible. The original negatives (45 minute training overlap and an 07 playing up with the 04s) have been addressed by WS within the first few weeks of the season, yet the negativity doesn’t acknowledge the positive changes and continues. I even saw a post here stating something to the effect of “good thing WS didn’t play this weekend, that was they couldn’t lose” or similar before it was rightly removed by the moderator.
We know someone here is blindly anti-WS. That blindness prevents objectivity. This is why these overwhelmingly negative posts simply aren’t credible.
Not OP or PP. whoever you are, you don't seem like a new poster and keep writing the same thing. Easy enough to switch computers. Can we move back to the substance and you go away with your posts about whether we should be here on DCUM? TIA. i would rathe here the complaints from 04 Dad then this endless credibility thing.
Perhaps you and 04 dad should just create an account and then IM each other. That would be the most useful thing either of you two could do to this thread. Take it offline.
Once you leave, I am sure PP and 04 Dad will too.You seem to be one sock puppet. Google it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP here. I have 10,000 as well and reading this just like many other 07 and 08 parents. You read, we all read, it influences things FBOW. That is why the VYSA pubs to the clubs talk so much about social media. I wouldn't spend 10,000 or 1,000 on an Amazon product that even had a well-written, credible negative review. Know many parents who rely on anonymous Amazon reviews, so I wouldn't downplay the value of DCUM. Jeff will tell you otherwise too!
Gotcha, so you’re saying that an organization or individual can start an anonymous Internet “feedback” strategy that trashes a competitor and you’ll believe it, because, duh, the Internet is always right.
Sounds like pure genius right there. In the words of PT Barnum, there’s a sucker born every minute.
The PP was correct about you. You just put down and criticize the posters personally.
New poster here. Actually, the PP made a valid point on not blindly trusting anonymous comments. There has been personal attacks in both directions in this train wreck of a thread.
I agree with the majority here that this feedback is not credible. The original negatives (45 minute training overlap and an 07 playing up with the 04s) have been addressed by WS within the first few weeks of the season, yet the negativity doesn’t acknowledge the positive changes and continues. I even saw a post here stating something to the effect of “good thing WS didn’t play this weekend, that was they couldn’t lose” or similar before it was rightly removed by the moderator.
We know someone here is blindly anti-WS. That blindness prevents objectivity. This is why these overwhelmingly negative posts simply aren’t credible.
Not OP or PP. whoever you are, you don't seem like a new poster and keep writing the same thing. Easy enough to switch computers. Can we move back to the substance and you go away with your posts about whether we should be here on DCUM? TIA. i would rathe here the complaints from 04 Dad then this endless credibility thing.
Perhaps you and 04 dad should just create an account and then IM each other. That would be the most useful thing either of you two could do to this thread. Take it offline.
You seem to be one sock puppet. Google it.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP here. I have 10,000 as well and reading this just like many other 07 and 08 parents. You read, we all read, it influences things FBOW. That is why the VYSA pubs to the clubs talk so much about social media. I wouldn't spend 10,000 or 1,000 on an Amazon product that even had a well-written, credible negative review. Know many parents who rely on anonymous Amazon reviews, so I wouldn't downplay the value of DCUM. Jeff will tell you otherwise too!
Gotcha, so you’re saying that an organization or individual can start an anonymous Internet “feedback” strategy that trashes a competitor and you’ll believe it, because, duh, the Internet is always right.
Sounds like pure genius right there. In the words of PT Barnum, there’s a sucker born every minute.
The PP was correct about you. You just put down and criticize the posters personally.
New poster here. Actually, the PP made a valid point on not blindly trusting anonymous comments. There has been personal attacks in both directions in this train wreck of a thread.
I agree with the majority here that this feedback is not credible. The original negatives (45 minute training overlap and an 07 playing up with the 04s) have been addressed by WS within the first few weeks of the season, yet the negativity doesn’t acknowledge the positive changes and continues. I even saw a post here stating something to the effect of “good thing WS didn’t play this weekend, that was they couldn’t lose” or similar before it was rightly removed by the moderator.
We know someone here is blindly anti-WS. That blindness prevents objectivity. This is why these overwhelmingly negative posts simply aren’t credible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP here. I have 10,000 as well and reading this just like many other 07 and 08 parents. You read, we all read, it influences things FBOW. That is why the VYSA pubs to the clubs talk so much about social media. I wouldn't spend 10,000 or 1,000 on an Amazon product that even had a well-written, credible negative review. Know many parents who rely on anonymous Amazon reviews, so I wouldn't downplay the value of DCUM. Jeff will tell you otherwise too!
Gotcha, so you’re saying that an organization or individual can start an anonymous Internet “feedback” strategy that trashes a competitor and you’ll believe it, because, duh, the Internet is always right.
Sounds like pure genius right there. In the words of PT Barnum, there’s a sucker born every minute.
The PP was correct about you. You just put down and criticize the posters personally.
New poster here. Actually, the PP made a valid point on not blindly trusting anonymous comments. There has been personal attacks in both directions in this train wreck of a thread.
I agree with the majority here that this feedback is not credible. The original negatives (45 minute training overlap and an 07 playing up with the 04s) have been addressed by WS within the first few weeks of the season, yet the negativity doesn’t acknowledge the positive changes and continues. I even saw a post here stating something to the effect of “good thing WS didn’t play this weekend, that was they couldn’t lose” or similar before it was rightly removed by the moderator.
We know someone here is blindly anti-WS. That blindness prevents objectivity. This is why these overwhelmingly negative posts simply aren’t credible.
Not OP or PP. whoever you are, you don't seem like a new poster and keep writing the same thing. Easy enough to switch computers. Can we move back to the substance and you go away with your posts about whether we should be here on DCUM? TIA. i would rathe here the complaints from 04 Dad then this endless credibility thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP here. I have 10,000 as well and reading this just like many other 07 and 08 parents. You read, we all read, it influences things FBOW. That is why the VYSA pubs to the clubs talk so much about social media. I wouldn't spend 10,000 or 1,000 on an Amazon product that even had a well-written, credible negative review. Know many parents who rely on anonymous Amazon reviews, so I wouldn't downplay the value of DCUM. Jeff will tell you otherwise too!
Gotcha, so you’re saying that an organization or individual can start an anonymous Internet “feedback” strategy that trashes a competitor and you’ll believe it, because, duh, the Internet is always right.
Sounds like pure genius right there. In the words of PT Barnum, there’s a sucker born every minute.
The PP was correct about you. You just put down and criticize the posters personally.
New poster here. Actually, the PP made a valid point on not blindly trusting anonymous comments. There has been personal attacks in both directions in this train wreck of a thread.
I agree with the majority here that this feedback is not credible. The original negatives (45 minute training overlap and an 07 playing up with the 04s) have been addressed by WS within the first few weeks of the season, yet the negativity doesn’t acknowledge the positive changes and continues. I even saw a post here stating something to the effect of “good thing WS didn’t play this weekend, that was they couldn’t lose” or similar before it was rightly removed by the moderator.
We know someone here is blindly anti-WS. That blindness prevents objectivity. This is why these overwhelmingly negative posts simply aren’t credible.