Anonymous wrote:All things being equal - regular exercise, good diet, no smoking - it's easier for a good looking 25 year old man to become a good looking 50 year old man as long as he continues with a healthy lifestyle. I think it's much tougher for a good looking 25 year old woman to become a good looking 50 year old woman - even with a continuous healthy lifestyle.
But there are plenty of exceptions. Gillian Anderson was and remains a beautiful woman. But what we see in Hollywood has never been reflective of what we see at the school pick up line. It's easier for 50 year old men who do the basic work - run, lift, eat well, avoid alcohol, do some yoga, get 8 hours of sleep, and dress reasonably well - to get second and third looks at the grocery store. While that remains true for some women, the luck of the genetic lottery factors much more prominently when it comes to who looks good going into their 50s.
So getting back to the original point, there are a lot of men that will find Gillian Anderson very attractive. But she's not typical for a woman in her 50s. It's much easier for a man to be a George Clooney or Daniel Craig in their 50s, then it is for a woman to be a Selma Hayek or Elizabeth Hurley in their 50s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would you rather drive a 2000 Mercedes with 200K on it or a 2024 Mercedes with 0 mile? Women in their 50s are like 2000 Mercedes with 200K on it.
You are vile.
But he is not wrong.
He is wrong because he’s deluded that 50 yr old men are somehow better than 50 yr old women.
Not sure how you know his age?
And yes, the analogy/ question applies to both sexes.
Don’t be dense. That was written to antagonize 50+ year old women. That’s stuff delusional old guys do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of course they do. My mom used to work in an old peoples’ home. The stories she’d tell alllllllllll the time of old people shagging like rabbits everywhere in the hallways, the community rooms, etc. was nuts. It’s like you had to walk around with buckets of cold water. If 88 year old men still get hard for great grannies, you can bet that many men still find 50, 60, and 70 year old women attractive.
This is very hard to believe with all the mobility issues they have. Walkers and canes everywhere! 50s, 60s ok but 70s and 80s?
You have NO clue. Old people bang like animals of left unsupervised. Not that hard to sit on a lap or do sideways sex in a bed or in a couch. They are like horny teenagers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hope I look like Gillian Anderson at that age
You know that photo has been highly retouched/photoshopped, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would you rather drive a 2000 Mercedes with 200K on it or a 2024 Mercedes with 0 mile? Women in their 50s are like 2000 Mercedes with 200K on it.
You are vile.
But he is not wrong.
He is wrong because he’s deluded that 50 yr old men are somehow better than 50 yr old women.
Not sure how you know his age?
And yes, the analogy/ question applies to both sexes.
Don’t be dense. That was written to antagonize 50+ year old women. That’s stuff delusional old guys do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think women in their 20-30 only sleep wity these men for money. I’m 46 and tuned down plenty of 43-59 year old men. They were not ugly but just not in same shape as me. They all claimed to date twenties and thirties women but I was not minimally interested in these same guys! They all offered taking care of me in different forms. I have own money and don’t need a man to take care of me.
I can’t tolerate any fat when I’m thin myself.
I definitely agree with you that a lot of men are just out of shape. I am 45 and in very good shape but that's because I have enjoyed fitness since I was 19.
Having said that maybe you don't see it as much but there a lot I mean a lot of women around your age in a very bad shape physically. Maybe there are women in shape compared to men when both are 40+ but we are not taking about a big gap here.
the people in this city are in bad shape generally. the difference btwn nyc and dc could not be bigger in this regard
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would you rather drive a 2000 Mercedes with 200K on it or a 2024 Mercedes with 0 mile? Women in their 50s are like 2000 Mercedes with 200K on it.
You are vile.
But he is not wrong.
He is wrong because he’s deluded that 50 yr old men are somehow better than 50 yr old women.
Not sure how you know his age?
And yes, the analogy/ question applies to both sexes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would you rather drive a 2000 Mercedes with 200K on it or a 2024 Mercedes with 0 mile? Women in their 50s are like 2000 Mercedes with 200K on it.
You are vile.
But he is not wrong.
He is wrong because he’s deluded that 50 yr old men are somehow better than 50 yr old women.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would you rather drive a 2000 Mercedes with 200K on it or a 2024 Mercedes with 0 mile? Women in their 50s are like 2000 Mercedes with 200K on it.
You are vile.
But he is not wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would you rather drive a 2000 Mercedes with 200K on it or a 2024 Mercedes with 0 mile? Women in their 50s are like 2000 Mercedes with 200K on it.
You are vile.
Anonymous wrote:Would you rather drive a 2000 Mercedes with 200K on it or a 2024 Mercedes with 0 mile? Women in their 50s are like 2000 Mercedes with 200K on it.
Anonymous wrote:I hope I look like Gillian Anderson at that age