Anonymous wrote:
Wait, what does he mean "neither side cares any more what justifies it (the greater conflict) or doesn't?"
The side the supports the Constitution cares very much about what justifies this conflict.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know the Tim Pool guy but I went to his Twitter account to try to understand what he meant in his tweet.
I think I see the new talking points to defend the ICE murder of this man.
They are going to say it was a mistake but justifiable self-defense. Someone yelled "gun gun!!" and an agent thought his life was in danger and so shot the victim in self defense.
One of the agents, took the gun before the guy was beaten and shot. There i literally NO justification for what happened.
Here is a synced up, two angle video: https://bsky.app/profile/dominicervolina.com/post/3md6wetpavk2q
And yet Republican politicians continue to justify it. I've come to believe there is literally nothing that will lead them to say anything different.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know the Tim Pool guy but I went to his Twitter account to try to understand what he meant in his tweet.
I think I see the new talking points to defend the ICE murder of this man.
They are going to say it was a mistake but justifiable self-defense. Someone yelled "gun gun!!" and an agent thought his life was in danger and so shot the victim in self defense.
One of the agents, took the gun before the guy was beaten and shot. There i literally NO justification for what happened.
Here is a synced up, two angle video: https://bsky.app/profile/dominicervolina.com/post/3md6wetpavk2q
And yet Republican politicians continue to justify it. I've come to believe there is literally nothing that will lead them to say anything different.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why ICE doesn’t wait to put out a statement. They knew the video was going to come out. The domestic terrorist line is absurd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know the Tim Pool guy but I went to his Twitter account to try to understand what he meant in his tweet.
I think I see the new talking points to defend the ICE murder of this man.
They are going to say it was a mistake but justifiable self-defense. Someone yelled "gun gun!!" and an agent thought his life was in danger and so shot the victim in self defense.
One of the agents, took the gun before the guy was beaten and shot. There i literally NO justification for what happened.
Here is a synced up, two angle video: https://bsky.app/profile/dominicervolina.com/post/3md6wetpavk2q
Anonymous wrote:But Rittenhouse can walk around with an automatic weapon?
See the hypocrisy here?
Anonymous wrote:I don't know the Tim Pool guy but I went to his Twitter account to try to understand what he meant in his tweet.
I think I see the new talking points to defend the ICE murder of this man.
They are going to say it was a mistake but justifiable self-defense. Someone yelled "gun gun!!" and an agent thought his life was in danger and so shot the victim in self defense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The suspect was armed with a gun which the federal agents recovered.
Which is everyone's constitutional right. Doesn't prove anything. It's like saying he was carrying a baguette and the police recovered it. So what?
Was he just walking down the street? If he was protesting with a gun, that’s concerning
He's a lawfully registered gun owner. He never touched the gun during the incident and was shot after the gun was taken from him.
This. Never pulled his gun out, never a threat. Bad, sloppy and very dangerous police work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The suspect was armed with a gun which the federal agents recovered.
Which is everyone's constitutional right. Doesn't prove anything. It's like saying he was carrying a baguette and the police recovered it. So what?
Was he just walking down the street? If he was protesting with a gun, that’s concerning
If only there was video footage for you to answer this question for yourself.
Anonymous wrote:The most simplistic explanation of the incident is agents had Alex subdued, one agent sees gun in waistband and yells “he has a gun! He has a gun!” while REMOVING THE GUN. Another agent hears “he has a gun” and immediately unholsters his weapon and starts shooting Alex in the back.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The suspect was armed with a gun which the federal agents recovered.
Which is everyone's constitutional right. Doesn't prove anything. It's like saying he was carrying a baguette and the police recovered it. So what?
Was he just walking down the street? If he was protesting with a gun, that’s concerning