Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not bad that they followed a lead and it didn’t pan out. It’s bad that they leaked his name and the media went with it. Also
Didn’t Brown have cameras in the buildings?
Brown sounds poorly managed. Now that the suspect has been cleared and released- I’m assuming his story is true and isn’t a schizophrenic delusion. He is student at Brown and was staying in hotel due to dorm flooding. Yet Brown isn’t aware of this? Odd
Apartment, not dorm.
Doesn’t matter. Brown should be aware of who has been accepted and who is enrolled in classes or eligible to enroll. Brown saying they have zero record of him having ties to the school- when clearly he has either been accepted and already taking classes or enrolled- isn’t a good look for them. How does that happen?
Anonymous wrote:Why are people rushing to demonize brown?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not bad that they followed a lead and it didn’t pan out. It’s bad that they leaked his name and the media went with it. Also
Didn’t Brown have cameras in the buildings?
Brown sounds poorly managed. Now that the suspect has been cleared and released- I’m assuming his story is true and isn’t a schizophrenic delusion. He is student at Brown and was staying in hotel due to dorm flooding. Yet Brown isn’t aware of this? Odd
Apartment, not dorm.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not bad that they followed a lead and it didn’t pan out. It’s bad that they leaked his name and the media went with it. Also
Didn’t Brown have cameras in the buildings?
Brown sounds poorly managed. Now that the suspect has been cleared and released- I’m assuming his story is true and isn’t a schizophrenic delusion. He is student at Brown and was staying in hotel due to dorm flooding. Yet Brown isn’t aware of this? Odd
Anonymous wrote:It’s not bad that they followed a lead and it didn’t pan out. It’s bad that they leaked his name and the media went with it. Also
Didn’t Brown have cameras in the buildings?
Anonymous wrote:It’s not bad that they followed a lead and it didn’t pan out. It’s bad that they leaked his name and the media went with it. Also
Didn’t Brown have cameras in the buildings?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not bad that they followed a lead and it didn’t pan out. It’s bad that they leaked his name and the media went with it. Also
Didn’t Brown have cameras in the buildings?
I’m assuming this guys face was covered. If they had a clear face shot it would be all over the place.
Anonymous wrote:Don't shooters typically want to be recognized for noriety?
Anonymous wrote:It’s not bad that they followed a lead and it didn’t pan out. It’s bad that they leaked his name and the media went with it. Also
Didn’t Brown have cameras in the buildings?
Anonymous wrote:Laura Loomer is a nutcase who pulled all of that out of her behind hole.
Saturday was the sabbath, there is a whole Jewish orthodox community just up the road. If anyone wanted to shoot up as many peaceful unarmed Jewish people as possible that is what would have made far more sense.
I would put more money on a personal relationship with one of the dead students, an unreturned attraction or rivalry with one of them, or a relationship with Brown the University and the engineering dept specifically. Getting back at someone or something.
And there’s a possibility that even if he was looking for someone in particular, they may not even have been there at all, and he just thought they might be.
From behind, the guy walking reminded me a lot of David Berkowitz. Soft and nerdy looking. Like you could tell me he was an engineering student and I wouldn’t say he doesn’t look like it. I once knew a guy who sat in front of me for four years in HS homeroom and he walked exactly like that. He got bullied a lot, and also ended up being an engineer.
There are just plenty of other places where you could kill a whole lot more people and this feels like a relatively specific destination.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I dunno this sure sounds like they had the wrong guy...
"Over the last 24 hours… that evidence now points in a different direction. So what that means is that this person of interest needs to be and should be released. I think what is really unfortunate, that this person's name was leaked to the public”
https://x.com/i/status/2000418187297661375
Local cops blame FBI...
Q: What exactly was the evidence that led you to this person of interest?
A: There was a tip that came in just like we were taking any other tips and that one came in specifically identifying a person of interest, which was this individual. And so we are detectives, just like the others, but this specific one it was actually picked up by the, by the FBI, and they followed through with it, and they ended up coming and locating this individual of interest.
...
And this of course gave actual killer hours to flee! And threw a wet blanket on any accurate tips!
Yes I’m sure you could do better at leading the investigation. They had a tip, followed it, and it didn’t pan out. It’s not unusual and I don’t understand the internet outrage.
The fbi has been poorly run, good peple have been fired, others have been reassigned to troll the streets for immigrants instrad of investigate crimes. Its not surprising we now have mistakes and a slow moving investigation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Criminals are getting smarter so it’s taking a little longer to get these people. It took days to get both Charlie Kirk’s killer and Luigi Mangione. The DC pipe bomber took years.
Eric Rudolph--at least eight years (Atlanta Olympics park) and, remember, Richard Jewell was blamed for some time. Meanwhile, Rudolph set bombs in multiple places for several years.
The Unibomber--his brother read his manifesto and recognized parts of it and turned him in. Really smart guy.