Anonymous wrote:

Ms. Halligan’s response, in which she was joined by both the Attorney General and the
Deputy Attorney General, contains a level of vitriol more appropriate for a cable news talk show

? what was Halligan's response that lead to this statement?

Here's how it started:

"UNITED STATES’ RESPONSE TO THE COURT’S JANUARY 6, 2026 ORDER
In violation of the Rules of Criminal Procedure and the principle of party presentation,
the Court has initiated a sua sponte inquisition into whether it should strike Ms. Halligan’s title
from the Government’s signature block. The order launching this quest reflects a fundamental
misunderstanding of Judge Currie’s orders dismissing the indictments in United States v.
Comey, No. 1:25-cr-272 and United States v. James, 2:25-cr-122 and flouts no fewer than three
separate lines of Supreme Court precedent on elementary principles like the role of federal
courts, the effect of district court rulings, and the nature of our adversarial system.
Adding insult to error, the order posits that the United States’ continued assertion of its
legal position that Ms. Halligan properly serves as the United States Attorney amounts to a
factual misrepresentation that could trigger attorney discipline. The Court’s thinly veiled threat
to use attorney discipline to cudgel the Executive Branch into conforming its legal position in
all criminal prosecutions to the views of a single district judge is a gross abuse of power and
an affront to the separation of powers."

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.vaed.586311/gov.uscourts.vaed.586311.22.0.pdf

Ms. Halligan’s response, in which she was joined by both the Attorney General and the
Deputy Attorney General, contains a level of vitriol more appropriate for a cable news talk show

? what was Halligan's response that lead to this statement?

A federal judge STRIKES the words "United States Attorney" from Lindsey Halligan's signature and warns that he will refer her to disciplinary proceedings if she persists in calling herself one.

Quite some order from that Radical Leftst Trump Appointee - Judge Novak.

"Ms. Halligan’s response, in which she was joined by both the Attorney General and the
Deputy Attorney General, contains a level of vitriol more appropriate for a cable news talk show
and falls far beneath the level of advocacy expected from litigants in this Court, particularly the
Department of Justice. The Court will not engage in a similar tit-for-tat and will instead analyze
the few points that Ms. Halligan offers to justify her continued identification of her position as
United States Attorney before the Court. Ultimately, the Court concludes for the reasons that
follow that Ms. Halligan’s continued identification of herself as the United States Attorney for
this District ignores a binding court order and may not continue; otherwise, Ms. Halligan and
anyone who joins her on a pleading containing the improper moniker subjects themselves to
potential disciplinary action in this Court pursuant to the Court’s Local Rules."

"The Eastern District of Virginia has long enjoyed the service of experienced prosecutors
with unquestioned integrity from both political parties serving as the United States Attorney.
Despite coming from different political backgrounds and holding very different ideological
views, they all shared an unwavering commitment to the Rule of Law, putting the interests of the
citizens of the District before their own personal ambitions, as true public servants do.
Unfortunately, it appears that this ethos has come to an end. A district judge acting at the
direction of the Chief Judge of the Fourth Circuit has ruled on behalf of the district judges of this
District that Ms. Halligan was invalidly appointed as the United States Attorney. No matter all of
her machinations, Ms. Halligan has no legal basis to represent to this Court that she holds the
position. And any such representation going forward can only be described as a false statement
made in direct defiance of valid court orders. In short, this charade of Ms. Halligan
masquerading as the United States Attorney for this District in direct defiance of binding court
orders must come to an end.""

"The Court recognizes that Ms. Halligan lacks the prosecutorial experience that has long
been the norm for those nominated to the position of United States Attorney in this District.
Consequently, and in light of her inexperience, the Court grants Ms. Halligan the benefit of the
doubt and refrains from referring her for further investigation and disciplinary action regarding
her misrepresentations to this Court at this time. However, this Memorandum Order provides
notice that, should Ms. Halligan persist in ignoring Judge Currie’s Orders and this Memorandum
Order in any matter before the undersigned, the Court will initiate disciplinary proceedings
against Ms. Halligan and any other signatory to an offending pleading pursuant to Federal Rule
of Disciplinary Enforcement V(A).""

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.vaed.586311/gov.uscourts.vaed.586311.23.0.pdf

She gonna go crying to her daddy.

They brought this guy to EDVA from Kentucky to back up Halligan and then still fired him.

Anonymous wrote:The coverup is always worse than the crime...

Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly (Bill Clinton 1997) just ordered the FBI to DESTROY key evidence in the James Comey criminal case.

Emails seized from Comey's leak buddy Daniel Richman, proof Comey lied to Congress, will be wiped out.

Another Mega MAGA Moron.

There was no such ruling. She ordered the return of Richman's personal property that the government was trying to search without a valid search warrant. Thisis quite clear from the ruling.

Does it hurt to be as stupid as you are?

Halligan not available and no one else will work on this.

Anonymous wrote:Another lawless order by another Democrat activist judge.

After these shameful DC judges persecuted Trump supporters for years after January 6th, they suddenly pretend to care about rights—to protect political allies.

The DC district court is a national disgrace.

Defund it.

Is this MAGA parody? It's hard to tell sometimes.

Another lawless order by another Democrat activist judge.

After these shameful DC judges persecuted Trump supporters for years after January 6th, they suddenly pretend to care about rights—to protect political allies.

The DC district court is a national disgrace.

Defund it.

Damn. I quoted the wrong article. Oh, well.

Anonymous wrote:

::fist shaking::

And I would have gotten away with it, if it wasn’t for that pesky Fourth Amendment!!

GMAFB.

Anonymous wrote:Everything from Trump world, every call, text message, email, calendar entry, and half-formed thought, was seized and put under a microscope for years. They even raided his home and rifled through the underwear drawer. Of course they never found anything. But now that the shoe is on the other foot, and there is highly incriminating evidence against the people who instigated the hoaxes, it somehow cannot be used. Just beyond infuriating.

All of what you cite as being an affront was done pursuant to a valid warrant, subpoena or other genuine legal process.

The only thing the judge has done is say "DOJ you must use a warrant, subpoena or other genuine legal process in order to use this."

We know you guys think of the constitution as a mere technicality, but it really isn't. It's important.