The DOJ figured out Steele's source and interviewed him. The source told the FBI it was just rumors, he had no idea if it was true.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:New England never should have given Trump the idea. There isn't a Democrat strategy Trump won't steal. Lawfare, redistricting ... Now he's testing the courts to see if his FBI director can say 86 Obama. I expect him to test the courts this year to find out if he can legally manufacture intelligence, wiretap democrat campaigns, indict comeys lawyers, raid obama and Biden houses, arrest Biden, charge Clinton for rape in arkansas...
He's got to do that stuff just to get even .. but he will go further to win.
Except it was an indepedent DOJ that obtained legal warrants.
It was a FISA court with sufficient evidence that people in Trump's orbit were conspiring with foreign actors
It wasn't don't by fiat with a corrupt and rogue government.
The Supreme Court did not cancel the referendum beforehand because under the constitution, the referendum is part of the legislative process, and the court will not step into the middle of that.Anonymous wrote:The virginia supreme court has set a precedent that it is ok to cancel an election after it has taken place.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:: In a loss for Democrats, the Virginia Supreme Court ruled the congressional map voters approved last month to counter GOP gerrymanders cannot go into effect.
The decision overturns the will of voters for technical reasons and gives Republicans a leg up for the 2026 midterms.
So the MAGAs are allowed to gerrymander without public input but democrats are not allowed to, despite an entire statewide referendum.
We are in for some very dark times.
Yep.
Though since DeSantis is ignoring his constitution substantively, Spanberger should ignore ours. they didn't strike the substance. Only the procedure.
No, these states were Democrat well into the 90s.Anonymous wrote:
You understand, that after the VRA and Civil Rights Act were signed by LBJ in 1964, that the parties switched, and the GOP adopted the racists white southern democrats - called the Southern Strategy. So when you are saying the "democrats seceded" you are referring to modern republicans, not modern democrats.
I get it that it is confusing, but please try to be historically accurate.
Anonymous wrote:New England never should have given Trump the idea. There isn't a Democrat strategy Trump won't steal. Lawfare, redistricting ... Now he's testing the courts to see if his FBI director can say 86 Obama. I expect him to test the courts this year to find out if he can legally manufacture intelligence, wiretap democrat campaigns, indict comeys lawyers, raid obama and Biden houses, arrest Biden, charge Clinton for rape in arkansas...
He's got to do that stuff just to get even .. but he will go further to win.
Anonymous wrote:: In a loss for Democrats, the Virginia Supreme Court ruled the congressional map voters approved last month to counter GOP gerrymanders cannot go into effect.
The decision overturns the will of voters for technical reasons and gives Republicans a leg up for the 2026 midterms.
So the MAGAs are allowed to gerrymander without public input but democrats are not allowed to, despite an entire statewide referendum.
We are in for some very dark times.
Anonymous wrote:New England never should have given Trump the idea. There isn't a Democrat strategy Trump won't steal. Lawfare, redistricting ... Now he's testing the courts to see if his FBI director can say 86 Obama. I expect him to test the courts this year to find out if he can legally manufacture intelligence, wiretap democrat campaigns, indict comeys lawyers, raid obama and Biden houses, arrest Biden, charge Clinton for rape in arkansas...
He's got to do that stuff just to get even .. but he will go further to win.
Anonymous wrote:Is there a point that Independents and traditional conservatives see this for what it is?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:: In a loss for Democrats, the Virginia Supreme Court ruled the congressional map voters approved last month to counter GOP gerrymanders cannot go into effect.
The decision overturns the will of voters for technical reasons and gives Republicans a leg up for the 2026 midterms.
So the MAGAs are allowed to gerrymander without public input but democrats are not allowed to, despite an entire statewide referendum.
We are in for some very dark times.
Yep.
Though since DeSantis is ignoring his constitution substantively, Spanberger should ignore ours. they didn't strike the substance. Only the procedure.
Anonymous wrote:: In a loss for Democrats, the Virginia Supreme Court ruled the congressional map voters approved last month to counter GOP gerrymanders cannot go into effect.
The decision overturns the will of voters for technical reasons and gives Republicans a leg up for the 2026 midterms.
So the MAGAs are allowed to gerrymander without public input but democrats are not allowed to, despite an entire statewide referendum.
We are in for some very dark times.