Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ironic that Musk brought Little X with him to the Senate today.
The nanny was probably with them.
So you assume he has childcare even though no one's seen it. But you assume thousands of federal employees don't have childcare because... ?
Hint: it's because they're women. No one in this lengthy thread assumes dad is WFH without childcare, or that a SAHD is watching kids.
+100
I made a similar point earlier on in this thread. This whole thing is rooted in misogyny.
For whatever reason people are angry at the thought of a mom being able to balance a full time job and have the flexibility to get your kids from the bus after school or pop out to a school event mid-day.
If a dad does this type of thing he’s basically celebrated. But I think there’s a) a lot of women out there who had it much harder (either having to leave the workforce or outsource a ton of childcare) and b) men who sneer at having to compete with “a mom” in the workplace.
Many dads I know have far more flexibility than moms. My husband did till recently.
Anonymous wrote:It’s not a lack of childcare that’s the problem; it’s that these women want to have it both ways. They don’t want to pay anyone else to watch their children, they prefer to fleece their employers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our kid has been working from home since well before Covid. When she and her husband decided to have kids they lined up child care first - the grandparents when the kids were babies and a preschool/daycare once they were toddlers. It never occurred to her for a second that she could watch her kids at home herself and work at the same time. It’s not fair to anyone involved.
Time to return to reality, ladies.
Why are you only putting the onus on the ladies? 🙄
And plenty of us paid for high quality infant care. We didn’t foist it on grandparents with outdated notions of gender roles. But moochers gonna mooch.
I say “ladies” because we all know there are no men on this thread. And in my post I made clear that THEY - not “she” - made arrangements for childcare when THEY decided to have kids.
I’m also sorry that you don’t have a more helpful mother. Sucks for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ironic that Musk brought Little X with him to the Senate today.
The nanny was probably with them.
So you assume he has childcare even though no one's seen it. But you assume thousands of federal employees don't have childcare because... ?
Hint: it's because they're women. No one in this lengthy thread assumes dad is WFH without childcare, or that a SAHD is watching kids.
+100
I made a similar point earlier on in this thread. This whole thing is rooted in misogyny.
For whatever reason people are angry at the thought of a mom being able to balance a full time job and have the flexibility to get your kids from the bus after school or pop out to a school event mid-day.
If a dad does this type of thing he’s basically celebrated. But I think there’s a) a lot of women out there who had it much harder (either having to leave the workforce or outsource a ton of childcare) and b) men who sneer at having to compete with “a mom” in the workplace.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ironic that Musk brought Little X with him to the Senate today.
The nanny was probably with them.
So you assume he has childcare even though no one's seen it. But you assume thousands of federal employees don't have childcare because... ?
Hint: it's because they're women. No one in this lengthy thread assumes dad is WFH without childcare, or that a SAHD is watching kids.
+100
I made a similar point earlier on in this thread. This whole thing is rooted in misogyny.
For whatever reason people are angry at the thought of a mom being able to balance a full time job and have the flexibility to get your kids from the bus after school or pop out to a school event mid-day.
If a dad does this type of thing he’s basically celebrated. But I think there’s a) a lot of women out there who had it much harder (either having to leave the workforce or outsource a ton of childcare) and b) men who sneer at having to compete with “a mom” in the workplace.
Many dads I know have far more flexibility than moms. My husband did till recently.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ironic that Musk brought Little X with him to the Senate today.
The nanny was probably with them.
So you assume he has childcare even though no one's seen it. But you assume thousands of federal employees don't have childcare because... ?
Hint: it's because they're women. No one in this lengthy thread assumes dad is WFH without childcare, or that a SAHD is watching kids.
+100
I made a similar point earlier on in this thread. This whole thing is rooted in misogyny.
For whatever reason people are angry at the thought of a mom being able to balance a full time job and have the flexibility to get your kids from the bus after school or pop out to a school event mid-day.
If a dad does this type of thing he’s basically celebrated. But I think there’s a) a lot of women out there who had it much harder (either having to leave the workforce or outsource a ton of childcare) and b) men who sneer at having to compete with “a mom” in the workplace.
Many dads I know have far more flexibility than moms. My husband did till recently.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ironic that Musk brought Little X with him to the Senate today.
The nanny was probably with them.
So you assume he has childcare even though no one's seen it. But you assume thousands of federal employees don't have childcare because... ?
Hint: it's because they're women. No one in this lengthy thread assumes dad is WFH without childcare, or that a SAHD is watching kids.
+100
I made a similar point earlier on in this thread. This whole thing is rooted in misogyny.
For whatever reason people are angry at the thought of a mom being able to balance a full time job and have the flexibility to get your kids from the bus after school or pop out to a school event mid-day.
If a dad does this type of thing he’s basically celebrated. But I think there’s a) a lot of women out there who had it much harder (either having to leave the workforce or outsource a ton of childcare) and b) men who sneer at having to compete with “a mom” in the workplace.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ironic that Musk brought Little X with him to the Senate today.
The nanny was probably with them.
So you assume he has childcare even though no one's seen it. But you assume thousands of federal employees don't have childcare because... ?
Hint: it's because they're women. No one in this lengthy thread assumes dad is WFH without childcare, or that a SAHD is watching kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread is 28 pages, and AFAICT not a single pro-RTO person has explained why it is better or necessary to have people commute to an office 5d/week where they will be on virtual calls at least half the time.
I don't know anyone who has no childcare and WFH. That's a strawman. But if you WFH, it's much easier to find and afford childcare since you don't have to account for commuting time.
This is the issue. FT RTO is being proposed solely to punish federal workers, for no other reason. And if you think that private sector employers won't see that they can also use this tactic with impunity (rather than layoffs with severance), you are an idiot.
Because you aren’t due an explanation. It’s happening. Get ready.
Yeah. All the "but, but, but, but WHHHYYYYY?" people are driving me nuts. Why? Because it's happening that's why. Can we please focus on the reality already? It's time. I'm a Democrat, I voted for Harris, and I'm going back to the office whether I like it or not. Start communicating with your leadership ways in which you could participate to make this work for your agency and for your family. Nothing will be gained here by digging in and throwing a tantrum over why.
No way. This is America. I’m not going to just go along with something like this because “it’s happening that’s why.”
RTO is pointless, bad for the environment and families and even bad for business.
Ok, so quit. Which is exactly what they want you to do.
I’m not quitting. I won’t meet the requirement like many other employees. This is all a game and easily won.
Then you will eventually be fired or let go and your reputation down the drain.
People do back channel references all the time and information like this comes out and will hurt your reputation. Even without a back channel reference people talk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ironic that Musk brought Little X with him to the Senate today.
The nanny was probably with them.
Anonymous wrote:He’s weirdly obsessed with just that one kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ironic that Musk brought Little X with him to the Senate today.
The nanny was probably with them.