Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
That "team" included, no doubt, the ABC producer who worked on the J6 docu-drama (hearings).
There's no need to watch 40,000 hours of video. We've all already seen more than enough footage to see how damning it is for the violent J6 seditionists. No amount of additional footage will make it go away. We will never forget and we will never forgive.
Yeah. Thanks to the videos released by McCarthy, we have seen that the J6 unselect committee was incredibly biased and one-sided in their effort to paint a picture that was not accurate.
We all suspected this prior to the hearings, but these videos have confirmed it.
Someone should go to jail for not allowing the defense of many of these individuals to have access to evidence prior to their pleas/trials.
Should it be Pelosi? Someone in the DOJ?
Again, we've all already seen more than enough footage to see how damning it is for the violent J6 seditionists. No amount of additional footage, and no amount of your whining and complaining and attempting to deflect will make it all go away.
No we haven’t. I say, release all the tapes. Let’s examine the evidence. Surely, one can see with the qanon shamon that the police were literally guiding him through the capitol building and never once attempting to slow him down or detain. Why aren’t more people from the left scratching their heads with this new information is concerning. Oh, I get it; he’s on the wrong team. 👍
It’s because none of that changes the fact that he committed felonies on video.
So why was this guy out the next day?
https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2022/01/06/whatever-happened-to-alleged-capitol-rioter-john-sullivan-n502773
Gosh, it’s almost like people who conspired, brought weapons and/or made credible threats were treated more harshly by our justice system. If only we had a code that spelled out what exactly was a crime, and laid out ranges for the fines and jail time. It’s just shocking.
This guy has a knife with him.
I don’t see any weapons charges. He said on video he had one, but later said he didn’t have one, and just said that to get to the front. So, without evidence, he is not going to be charged.
Amazing how his word is just taken as fact!
Right, because of the presumption of innocence. If there is conflicting information, and both things are equally plausible or believable, we opt for the one that assumes innocence. This is basic constitutional rights. You can believe whatever you’d like, but we need evidence to use in court. Conflicting statements are not good evidence. The other defendants with weapon charges had evidence tying the weapons to them.
As I said, keep on talking - right into a corner
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The videos will confirm those who already know the J6 panel was hyperpartisan and greatly exaggerated what happened and that it was little more than a spontaneous crowd of not very bright people running around for a few hours with no real aim or objectives except to protest and have fun with it. It will not change the views of those who believe the J6 panel and that democracy was about to be overthrown and the US become a fascist state.
+100
Anonymous wrote:The videos will confirm those who already know the J6 panel was hyperpartisan and greatly exaggerated what happened and that it was little more than a spontaneous crowd of not very bright people running around for a few hours with no real aim or objectives except to protest and have fun with it. It will not change the views of those who believe the J6 panel and that democracy was about to be overthrown and the US become a fascist state.