Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pin this for when Oz and Mastriani claim fraud on November 9th and 10th...

Damn, look at that “I already voted” tab.

Maybe yes, maybe no.
If 2016 taught you anything it should be that people lie on polls because they don't want to look like a jerk

And 2018 and 2020 taught you what?

Polls in 2020 had democrats comfortably taking the senate. Gideon is still wondering what happened.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pin this for when Oz and Mastriani claim fraud on November 9th and 10th...

Damn, look at that “I already voted” tab.

Maybe yes, maybe no.
If 2016 taught you anything it should be that people lie on polls because they don't want to look like a jerk

And 2018 and 2020 taught you what?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pin this for when Oz and Mastriani claim fraud on November 9th and 10th...

Damn, look at that “I already voted” tab.

How many of those voted before the debate? The question is whether it’s enough to carry Fetterman past the post-debate Oz wave.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pin this for when Oz and Mastriani claim fraud on November 9th and 10th...

Damn, look at that “I already voted” tab.

Maybe yes, maybe no.
If 2016 taught you anything it should be that people lie on polls because they don't want to look like a jerk

Anonymous wrote:Pin this for when Oz and Mastriani claim fraud on November 9th and 10th...

Damn, look at that “I already voted” tab.

Pin this for when Oz and Mastriani claim fraud on November 9th and 10th...

Honestly, I think polls are crap but FWIW...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

Is Monmouth reliable?

I rely on Predictit comments for this kind of analysis. There are a couple of criticisms of this poll. First it was confusing--respondents were asked if they definitely or probably would vote for Fetterman or Oz and the number adds up to 106%. They say it should have been a head to head question. The other criticism is that the poll overestimates the young and Hispanic vote. Despite these criticisms, Oz price has dropped a few cents on the site.

Anonymous wrote:

🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

Is Monmouth reliable?

Anonymous wrote:

🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

Nice!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fetterman is a clown…..utter buffoon. How could anybody with even a modicum of intelligence vote for him? Vote for competence over ideology like a good American.

Uh, maybe you didn't see who the other guy is? Oz is and has always been a clown, is unqualified, and has no ties to the state.

Actually, he is an accomplished cardiac surgeon, but nice try.

But why are alll the people who took his diet pills still fat?? He literally promised it would make them thin!

Provide evidence that he promised or guaranteed anything.

Democrats would rather elect and low functioning mushroom because they put ideology in front of country.

Dr. Oz is running for US Senate in Pennsylvania. Here are 8 times he's made false or baseless medical claims.
https://www.businessinsider.com/dr-oz-false-misleading-baseless-medical-claims-coronavirus-2020-4?op=1

No guarantees. And nobody with even a modest intellect would claim that these two candidates are on the same intellectual level. Oz can run circles around Fetterman. But by all means vote for the guy that wants to release a third of incarcerated criminals.

That's not true. Fetterman's recovering from a stroke. There are linguistic processing delays that make debate harder, but he did better than most R's who ran for Presient these past 20 years. Also, I'd seen him in the past and he was fine. He's a decent human being whereas Oz is a charlatan and a quack.

Please provide one concrete example of how you know for certain that Fetterman is a "decent human being." I don't doubt you, but this is a rather inane statement, and I'd like to see your back-up point.

Provide one concrete example to disprove the point.

Upon hearing of a crime, held a random black jogger at gunpoint.

Yep. This is the point I was about to make. An INNOCENT black jogger.

An innocent black jogger, named Chris Miyares, who has forgiven him and has actually put his support behind Fetterman. Miyares has endorsed Fetterman.

🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fetterman is a clown…..utter buffoon. How could anybody with even a modicum of intelligence vote for him? Vote for competence over ideology like a good American.

Uh, maybe you didn't see who the other guy is? Oz is and has always been a clown, is unqualified, and has no ties to the state.

Actually, he is an accomplished cardiac surgeon, but nice try.

But why are alll the people who took his diet pills still fat?? He literally promised it would make them thin!

Provide evidence that he promised or guaranteed anything.

Democrats would rather elect and low functioning mushroom because they put ideology in front of country.

Dr. Oz is running for US Senate in Pennsylvania. Here are 8 times he's made false or baseless medical claims.
https://www.businessinsider.com/dr-oz-false-misleading-baseless-medical-claims-coronavirus-2020-4?op=1

No guarantees. And nobody with even a modest intellect would claim that these two candidates are on the same intellectual level. Oz can run circles around Fetterman. But by all means vote for the guy that wants to release a third of incarcerated criminals.

That's not true. Fetterman's recovering from a stroke. There are linguistic processing delays that make debate harder, but he did better than most R's who ran for Presient these past 20 years. Also, I'd seen him in the past and he was fine. He's a decent human being whereas Oz is a charlatan and a quack.

Please provide one concrete example of how you know for certain that Fetterman is a "decent human being." I don't doubt you, but this is a rather inane statement, and I'd like to see your back-up point.

Provide one concrete example to disprove the point.

Upon hearing of a crime, held a random black jogger at gunpoint.

Yep. This is the point I was about to make. An INNOCENT black jogger.

Oz kills puppies.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fetterman is a clown…..utter buffoon. How could anybody with even a modicum of intelligence vote for him? Vote for competence over ideology like a good American.

Uh, maybe you didn't see who the other guy is? Oz is and has always been a clown, is unqualified, and has no ties to the state.

Actually, he is an accomplished cardiac surgeon, but nice try.

But why are alll the people who took his diet pills still fat?? He literally promised it would make them thin!

Provide evidence that he promised or guaranteed anything.

Democrats would rather elect and low functioning mushroom because they put ideology in front of country.

Dr. Oz is running for US Senate in Pennsylvania. Here are 8 times he's made false or baseless medical claims.
https://www.businessinsider.com/dr-oz-false-misleading-baseless-medical-claims-coronavirus-2020-4?op=1

No guarantees. And nobody with even a modest intellect would claim that these two candidates are on the same intellectual level. Oz can run circles around Fetterman. But by all means vote for the guy that wants to release a third of incarcerated criminals.

That's not true. Fetterman's recovering from a stroke. There are linguistic processing delays that make debate harder, but he did better than most R's who ran for Presient these past 20 years. Also, I'd seen him in the past and he was fine. He's a decent human being whereas Oz is a charlatan and a quack.

Please provide one concrete example of how you know for certain that Fetterman is a "decent human being." I don't doubt you, but this is a rather inane statement, and I'd like to see your back-up point.

Provide one concrete example to disprove the point.

Decent human beings don't live at home with mommy and daddy, sponging off the family wealth, well into middle age.

Fetterman
Who did that?

MAGA propaganda.

I am. Dr. Oz has pulled ahead