Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maryland teams are playing to win, Capital teams are playing to get girls recruited. Different dynamics.
So would you pick the MD Team or Cap Blue?
I can’t see any Hero’s ‘27 players leaving for Capital.
Heard Capital got rolled by Hero's over weekend, not competitive.
Capital fared better against Hero's than Skywalkers...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maryland teams are playing to win, Capital teams are playing to get girls recruited. Different dynamics.
So would you pick the MD Team or Cap Blue?
I can’t see any Hero’s ‘27 players leaving for Capital.
Heard Capital got rolled by Hero's over weekend, not competitive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maryland teams are playing to win, Capital teams are playing to get girls recruited. Different dynamics.
So would you pick the MD Team or Cap Blue?
I can’t see any Hero’s ‘27 players leaving for Capital.
Anonymous wrote:Maryland teams are playing to win, Capital teams are playing to get girls recruited. Different dynamics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maryland teams are playing to win, Capital teams are playing to get girls recruited. Different dynamics.
So would you pick the MD Team or Cap Blue?
Anonymous wrote:Maryland teams are playing to win, Capital teams are playing to get girls recruited. Different dynamics.
Anonymous wrote:Same thing more or less. Probably less politics playing for a Maryland team though.
Anonymous wrote:Had capital blue ‘27 played any scrimmages/games yet? Did they have the traditional play date with heros and sky walkers? How do they look?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NL and Pride should both take pride in the fact that girls leave their programs and head to Capital. That would be a selling point if they were smart they would embrace it. If they want a high school program they should be very honest about the fact that it is a good back up if they want to continue playing. Now granted Pride is leaps and bounds ahead of NL for high school, I still think they both should do more embracing of the Capital pathway instead of trying to sell girls on staying there.
I know it depends on grad year, but BLC would be the better option if the goal is Capital right? 2027 obviously a very dominant team for BLC, maybe their gold standard.
How many players did Pride lose? They were always a solid team at 2027, played hard, you had to bring your A game against them.
If I could do it all over again, given the way things are now, I would go Stars. Capital obviously favors them and has a connection to the program. This is not to say that they don't also have a relationship with BLC and that they don't take girls from NL and Pride but when cuts were made from teams this year or if they needed additional players .... they always got them from Stars.
The relationship with BLC and capital is just as strong. Any strong players out of Stars, BLC and Pride will make capital on the same level. The only stars player who might have a slight advantage is one who is on the bubble, but I don't think even that had a major impact last year.
Don’t forget Capital has a business interest in plucking the very best of Pride MS. They do compete in the HS space after all.
Please explain.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NL and Pride should both take pride in the fact that girls leave their programs and head to Capital. That would be a selling point if they were smart they would embrace it. If they want a high school program they should be very honest about the fact that it is a good back up if they want to continue playing. Now granted Pride is leaps and bounds ahead of NL for high school, I still think they both should do more embracing of the Capital pathway instead of trying to sell girls on staying there.
I know it depends on grad year, but BLC would be the better option if the goal is Capital right? 2027 obviously a very dominant team for BLC, maybe their gold standard.
How many players did Pride lose? They were always a solid team at 2027, played hard, you had to bring your A game against them.
If I could do it all over again, given the way things are now, I would go Stars. Capital obviously favors them and has a connection to the program. This is not to say that they don't also have a relationship with BLC and that they don't take girls from NL and Pride but when cuts were made from teams this year or if they needed additional players .... they always got them from Stars.
The relationship with BLC and capital is just as strong. Any strong players out of Stars, BLC and Pride will make capital on the same level. The only stars player who might have a slight advantage is one who is on the bubble, but I don't think even that had a major impact last year.
Don’t forget Capital has a business interest in plucking the very best of Pride MS. They do compete in the HS space after all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NL and Pride should both take pride in the fact that girls leave their programs and head to Capital. That would be a selling point if they were smart they would embrace it. If they want a high school program they should be very honest about the fact that it is a good back up if they want to continue playing. Now granted Pride is leaps and bounds ahead of NL for high school, I still think they both should do more embracing of the Capital pathway instead of trying to sell girls on staying there.
I know it depends on grad year, but BLC would be the better option if the goal is Capital right? 2027 obviously a very dominant team for BLC, maybe their gold standard.
How many players did Pride lose? They were always a solid team at 2027, played hard, you had to bring your A game against them.
If I could do it all over again, given the way things are now, I would go Stars. Capital obviously favors them and has a connection to the program. This is not to say that they don't also have a relationship with BLC and that they don't take girls from NL and Pride but when cuts were made from teams this year or if they needed additional players .... they always got them from Stars.
The relationship with BLC and capital is just as strong. Any strong players out of Stars, BLC and Pride will make capital on the same level. The only stars player who might have a slight advantage is one who is on the bubble, but I don't think even that had a major impact last year.